Cloud Foundry vs OpenShift

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.4K

Votes517

GitHub Stars885

Forks510

Cloud Foundry

Stacks188

Followers346

Votes5

Cloud Foundry vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Cloud Foundry and OpenShift are both popular open-source platforms for deploying and managing cloud-native applications. Let's explore the key differences between the two platforms:

Architecture: Cloud Foundry follows a "principles over configuration" approach, where it provides a higher level of abstraction and hides many of the underlying infrastructure details. On the other hand, OpenShift takes a more flexible approach by providing a container platform built on top of Kubernetes. This allows users to have more control over the underlying infrastructure and directly interact with Kubernetes resources.
Community and Ecosystem: Cloud Foundry has a strong and established community with a focus on enterprise-grade solutions. It offers a wide range of services and frameworks that can be easily integrated into applications. OpenShift, being built on Kubernetes, benefits from the large and active Kubernetes community. It has a wider ecosystem of tools and support for various container-related technologies.
Ease of Use: Cloud Foundry is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It abstracts away much of the complexity involved in deploying and managing applications, making it easier for developers to focus on application development. OpenShift, being more customizable and flexible, requires a higher learning curve and more expertise to effectively use and manage.
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud Foundry is primarily focused on public and private cloud deployments, with less emphasis on hybrid cloud or on-premises environments. OpenShift, being based on Kubernetes, offers more flexibility in deployment options. It can be deployed on public clouds, private clouds, or on-premises, making it well-suited for hybrid cloud and multi-cloud architectures.
Integration with Existing Infrastructure: Cloud Foundry provides built-in support for various infrastructure and cloud providers, making it easier to integrate with existing infrastructure. OpenShift, being based on Kubernetes, also offers integration with popular infrastructure providers, but with more flexibility and customization options.
Application Portability: Cloud Foundry provides a high level of portability by abstracting away the underlying infrastructure. Applications developed and deployed on Cloud Foundry can be easily migrated between different Cloud Foundry instances. OpenShift, being built on Kubernetes, provides a degree of application portability, but it may require additional effort to migrate applications between different Kubernetes clusters.

In summary, Cloud Foundry focuses on simplicity, ease of use, and enterprise-grade solutions, while OpenShift offers more flexibility, customization options, and a wider ecosystem of tools and technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift	Cloud Foundry
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.	Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.
Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command	Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
GitHub Stars 885	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 510	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 188
Followers 1.4K	Followers 346
Votes 517	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 99 Good free plan 63 Open Source 47 Easy setup 43 Nodejs support 42 Well documented Cons 2 Decisions are made for you, limiting your options 2 License cost 1 Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams	Pros 2 Perfectly aligned with springboot 1 Free distributed tracing (zipkin) 1 Free service discovery (Eureka) 1 Application health management
Integrations
No integrations available	VMware vSphere Logentries Amazon EC2 OpenStack Papertrail Amazon VPC Splunk Cloud Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Cloud Foundry vs OpenShift: What are the differences?

Cloud Foundry and OpenShift are both popular open-source platforms for deploying and managing cloud-native applications. Let's explore the key differences between the two platforms:

Architecture: Cloud Foundry follows a "principles over configuration" approach, where it provides a higher level of abstraction and hides many of the underlying infrastructure details. On the other hand, OpenShift takes a more flexible approach by providing a container platform built on top of Kubernetes. This allows users to have more control over the underlying infrastructure and directly interact with Kubernetes resources.
Community and Ecosystem: Cloud Foundry has a strong and established community with a focus on enterprise-grade solutions. It offers a wide range of services and frameworks that can be easily integrated into applications. OpenShift, being built on Kubernetes, benefits from the large and active Kubernetes community. It has a wider ecosystem of tools and support for various container-related technologies.
Ease of Use: Cloud Foundry is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It abstracts away much of the complexity involved in deploying and managing applications, making it easier for developers to focus on application development. OpenShift, being more customizable and flexible, requires a higher learning curve and more expertise to effectively use and manage.
Deployment Flexibility: Cloud Foundry is primarily focused on public and private cloud deployments, with less emphasis on hybrid cloud or on-premises environments. OpenShift, being based on Kubernetes, offers more flexibility in deployment options. It can be deployed on public clouds, private clouds, or on-premises, making it well-suited for hybrid cloud and multi-cloud architectures.
Integration with Existing Infrastructure: Cloud Foundry provides built-in support for various infrastructure and cloud providers, making it easier to integrate with existing infrastructure. OpenShift, being based on Kubernetes, also offers integration with popular infrastructure providers, but with more flexibility and customization options.
Application Portability: Cloud Foundry provides a high level of portability by abstracting away the underlying infrastructure. Applications developed and deployed on Cloud Foundry can be easily migrated between different Cloud Foundry instances. OpenShift, being built on Kubernetes, provides a degree of application portability, but it may require additional effort to migrate applications between different Kubernetes clusters.

Cloud Foundry vs OpenShift

Overview