StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. DeepSource Analyzer vs Phabricator

DeepSource Analyzer vs Phabricator

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187
DeepSource
DeepSource
Stacks16
Followers49
Votes8

DeepSource Analyzer vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the realm of code analysis and code review tools, two popular choices are DeepSource Analyzer and Phabricator. Both offer unique features and capabilities to help developers improve code quality and streamline the code review process.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: DeepSource Analyzer integrates seamlessly with various version control systems, such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab, allowing for real-time analysis of code changes as they are committed. On the other hand, Phabricator also supports integration with VCS but focuses more on providing a platform for code review, task management, and collaboration rather than real-time code analysis.

  2. Code Analysis Capabilities: DeepSource Analyzer offers a wide range of code analysis tools, including style checks, security vulnerability detection, and performance optimizations. It provides actionable insights and suggestions to help developers improve code quality. In contrast, Phabricator does not have built-in code analysis capabilities but instead relies on external tools and plugins for this functionality.

  3. Rich Code Review Features: Phabricator is renowned for its comprehensive code review features, such as inline comments, status tracking, and differential revisions. It provides a robust platform for thorough code reviews and collaboration among team members. While DeepSource Analyzer does offer code review capabilities, they may not be as extensive or customizable as Phabricator's.

  4. Ease of Use and Setup: DeepSource Analyzer is known for its user-friendly interface and quick setup process, making it easy for teams to start utilizing its features without much hassle. Phabricator, on the other hand, may have a steeper learning curve and require more configuration to set up, particularly for teams new to the platform.

  5. Scalability and Customization: Phabricator is highly scalable and offers extensive customization options, allowing teams to tailor the platform to their specific workflows and requirements. It can cater to the needs of large organizations with complex development processes. DeepSource Analyzer, while versatile, may not offer the same level of scalability and customization options as Phabricator.

In Summary, DeepSource Analyzer excels in real-time code analysis and ease of use, while Phabricator shines in comprehensive code review features and scalability. Both tools offer valuable capabilities for improving code quality and collaboration in software development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phabricator
Phabricator
DeepSource
DeepSource

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

DeepSource helps developers ship clean and secure code with powerful static analysis, OWASP Top 10 reporting, and Autofix. Trusted by thousands of startups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies.

reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
Simple configuration; Continuous analysis; Fewer false-positives; Integration with existing tools; Know each issue in detail; Broad-spectrum of issue coverage.
Statistics
Stacks
221
Stacks
16
Followers
323
Followers
49
Votes
187
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Pros
  • 3
    Free for open source
  • 3
    Easy setup and analysis
  • 2
    Autofixes for many lints for free
Cons
  • 1
    Test coverage % differs from actual
Integrations
Asana
Asana
Jira
Jira
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
C#
C#
Terraform
Terraform
Docker
Docker
Scala
Scala
GitHub
GitHub
JavaScript
JavaScript
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket

What are some alternatives to Phabricator, DeepSource?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana