Instrumental vs ruxit: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between Instrumental and Ruxit are highlighted below:

1. **Data Collection**: Instrumental mainly focuses on monitoring applications and servers with detailed insights into their performance metrics, whereas Ruxit offers full-stack monitoring including real user monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, and code-level visibility into applications.
2. **Deployment**: Instrumental requires manual installation of the monitoring agent on servers and applications, while Ruxit offers automated deployment through its OneAgent technology, enabling quicker and easier setup.
3. **Machine Learning**: Ruxit incorporates advanced machine learning algorithms to analyze performance data and provide proactive insights, while Instrumental lacks this level of automated analysis and intelligence.
4. **Compatibility**: Instrumental is compatible with a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, offering flexibility in monitoring diverse environments, whereas Ruxit is more tailored towards monitoring applications built on specific technologies like Java, .NET, and Node.js.
5. **Customization**: Instrumental provides extensive customization options for configuring monitoring alerts, dashboards, and reports to meet specific requirements, whereas Ruxit offers a more out-of-the-box monitoring solution with limited customization capabilities.
6. **Scalability**: Ruxit is designed for scalability with its cloud-based monitoring platform, allowing easy scaling of monitoring resources based on demand, while Instrumental may require additional configurations for managing large-scale monitoring deployments.

In Summary, Instrumental and Ruxit differ in data collection focus, deployment method, machine learning integration, compatibility, customization options, and scalability capabilities.