StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. KrakenD vs Swagger Codegen

KrakenD vs Swagger Codegen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
Stacks194
Followers163
Votes1
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks6.0K
KrakenD
KrakenD
Stacks59
Followers158
Votes9

KrakenD vs Swagger Codegen: What are the differences?

Introduction

KrakenD and Swagger Codegen are both tools used in API development. However, they have some key differences that set them apart.

1. Request and Response Mapping:

KrakenD focuses on the concept of Backend-for-Frontend (BFF) pattern, allowing you to have fine-grained control over your API's responses and how the requests are orchestrated at the backend. On the other hand, Swagger Codegen generates client SDKs and server stubs based on OpenAPI (formerly known as Swagger) specification, focusing on automating the API code generation process.

2. Flexibility and Customization:

KrakenD provides extensive configuration options, enabling you to customize and implement complex API behaviors, such as rate limiting and caching. It delivers a more flexible approach to building APIs. In contrast, Swagger Codegen aims to automate the code generation process, providing less flexibility in terms of customization.

3. Runtime Environment:

KrakenD is a standalone API gateway that needs to be hosted and deployed separately. It can be easily integrated with existing infrastructure. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, is a tool that generates source code, which needs to be compiled and run within the desired runtime environment, such as a server or client application.

4. Learning Curve and Complexity:

KrakenD has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and the need to understand how to configure it properly. It requires a deeper knowledge of API design and backend implementation. Swagger Codegen simplifies the process by generating boilerplate code, reducing the complexity for developers.

5. Documentation Support:

KrakenD lacks extensive built-in documentation generation capabilities, requiring manual documentation efforts. In contrast, Swagger Codegen includes features to generate interactive API documentation based on the provided OpenAPI specification. This makes it easier for developers to document their APIs.

6. Ecosystem and Community Support:

Swagger Codegen is backed by a large and active developer community, providing support, plugins, and various integrations. It has become a well-established tool in the API development ecosystem. While KrakenD also has a community around it, it is relatively smaller compared to Swagger Codegen. This may impact the availability of resources and community support.

In Summary, KrakenD offers fine-grained control over API responses and request orchestration, with flexibility and customization options. It has a steeper learning curve, requires a separate deployment, lacks extensive documentation support, and its community is relatively smaller. In contrast, Swagger Codegen automates code generation based on OpenAPI specification, providing simplicity, extensive documentation support, and a larger community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
KrakenD
KrakenD

It is an open source project which allows generation of API client libraries (SDK generation), server stubs, and documentation automatically from an OpenAPI Specification.

Its core functionality is to create an API that acts as an aggregator of many microservices into single endpoints, doing the heavy-lifting automatically for you: aggregate, transform, filter, decode, throttle, auth and more.

Generate client SDKs in over 40 different languages for end developers to easily integrate with your API; Always updated with the latest and greatest changes in the programming world; Remove tedious plumbing and configuration by generating boilerplate server code in over 20 different languages
Throttling and usage quotas; Extensible architecture; Circuit breaker; High-load and burst; Service discovery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
194
Stacks
59
Followers
163
Followers
158
Votes
1
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    SDK Generation
Pros
  • 2
    Best performant
  • 2
    Documentation
  • 2
    Stateless
  • 1
    GitOps oriented
  • 1
    Easiest to install
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
JavaScript
JavaScript
Linux
Linux
C++
C++
Perl
Perl
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
TypeScript
TypeScript
Ruby
Ruby
Keycloak
Keycloak
Docker
Docker
Auth0
Auth0
ELK
ELK
Logstash
Logstash
Grafana
Grafana
Kibana
Kibana
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to Swagger Codegen, KrakenD?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope