Log Owl vs Sentry

Overview

Sentry

Stacks15.1K

Followers9.4K

Votes864

GitHub Stars42.4K

Forks4.5K

Log Owl

Stacks2

Followers8

Votes0

GitHub Stars159

Forks15

Log Owl vs Sentry: What are the differences?

### Introduction
Key differences between Log Owl and Sentry are highlighted below.

1. **Data Privacy and Security**: Log Owl places a strong emphasis on data privacy by offering on-premise deployment options, ensuring sensitive data stays within the company's own environment. On the other hand, Sentry predominantly operates as a cloud-based solution, which may raise concerns for organizations with strict data security requirements.
   
2. **Log Management Capabilities**: Log Owl focuses on providing robust log management capabilities with features like log aggregation, monitoring, and analysis. Meanwhile, Sentry primarily specializes in error tracking and crash reporting, making it a more suitable choice for organizations looking to primarily track software issues and bugs.

3. **Pricing Structure**: Log Owl follows a straightforward pricing structure based on features and the number of users. In contrast, Sentry's pricing model is based on the volume of events processed, which could potentially lead to varying costs based on usage levels for organizations.

4. **Integration Options**: Log Owl offers integrations with a wide range of tools commonly used in the DevOps landscape, ensuring seamless compatibility with existing workflows. Sentry, on the other hand, while also providing integrations, may have a more limited scope compared to Log Owl in terms of the tools it supports.

5. **User Interface and Experience**: Log Owl boasts a user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate, catering to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Conversely, Sentry's interface may be more focused on developers and technical users, potentially requiring a steeper learning curve for those not familiar with technical complexities.

6. **Customizability and Flexibility**: Log Owl offers extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs and preferences. On the contrary, while Sentry provides some level of customization, it may not offer the same degree of flexibility as Log Owl in adapting to unique requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between Log Owl and Sentry lie in data privacy, log management capabilities, pricing structure, integration options, user experience, and customizability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sentry, Log Owl

Nicholas

Jun 1, 2020

Decided

I essentially inherited a Shopify theme that was originally created by an agency. After discovering a number of errors being thrown in the Dev Console just by scrolling through the website, I needed more visibility over any errors happening in the field. Having used both Sentry and TrackJS, I always got lost in the TrackJS interface, so I felt more comfortable introducing Sentry. The Sentry free tier is also very generous, although it turns out the theme threw over 15k errors in less than a week.

I highly recommend setting up error tracking from day one. Theoretically, you should never need to upgrade from the free tier if you're keeping on top of the errors...

250k views250k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sentry	Log Owl
Sentry’s Application Monitoring platform helps developers see performance issues, fix errors faster, and optimize their code health.	Get the insights you need on how your IT services perform in production. Track errors with all the details you need to fix issues and get detailed user analytics, privacy-focused and all in one place.
Real-Time Updates: For the first time, developers can fix code-level issues anywhere in the stack well before users even encounter an error.;Complete Context: Spend more time where it matters, rather than investing in low-impact issues.;Integrate Everywhere: Drop-in integration for every major platform, framework, and language -- JavaScript, Python, PHP, Ruby, Node, Java, .NET, mobile.;Root Cause: See the events that lead to errors so you always debug the right thing the first time.;Private & Secure: Sentry is SOC-2 compliant with GDPR, PCI DSS, HIPAA, and Privacy Shield by default.;Open Source: Sentry is 100% open source and available on GitHub.	Error tracking; Ethical analytics; Self-hosted
Statistics
GitHub Stars 42.4K	GitHub Stars 159
GitHub Forks 4.5K	GitHub Forks 15
Stacks 15.1K	Stacks 2
Followers 9.4K	Followers 8
Votes 864	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 238 Consolidates similar errors and makes resolution easy 121 Email Notifications 108 Open source 84 Slack integration 71 Github integration Cons 12 Confusing UI 4 Bundle size	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Sprint.ly C# PagerDuty Twilio Auth0 Golang Datadog Backbone.js Django Swift	JavaScript Node.js Slack

What are some alternatives to Sentry, Log Owl?

Rollbar

Rollbar is the leading continuous code improvement platform that proactively discovers, predicts, and remediates errors with real-time AI-assisted workflows. With Rollbar, developers continually improve their code and constantly innovate ra

Bugsnag

Bugsnag captures errors from your web, mobile and back-end applications, providing instant visibility into user impact. Diagnostic data and tools are included to help your team prioritize, debug and fix exceptions fast.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Opbeat

Opbeat is application monitoring for developers, and gives you performance metrics, error logging, release tracking and workflow in one smart product.

Airbrake

Airbrake collects errors for your applications in all major languages and frameworks. We alert you to new errors and give you critical context, trends and details needed to find and fix errors fast.

Honeybadger

Honeybadger does more than report errors, it helps you work with your team to fix them. Errors can be assigned. You can comment via email. And a fine-grained permissions system means you control who has access to each specific project.

Errbit

Errbit is a tool for collecting and managing errors from other applications. It is Airbrake (formerly known as Hoptoad) API compliant, so if you are already using Airbrake, you can just point the airbrake gem to your Errbit server.

OverOps

OverOps maps the DNA of code as it’s executing in pre-prod and production to Identify all issues and anomalies, and deliver True Root Cause to the right person, without relying on logs.

TrackJS

Production error monitoring and reporting for web applications. TrackJS provides deep insights into real user errors. See the user, network, and application events that tell the story of an error so you can actually fix them.

App Enlight

App Enlight provides a helpful interface to let you and your team save time spent on debugging and reproducing exceptions and performance issues from a production environment.

Related Comparisons

Log Owl vs Sentry: What are the differences?

### Introduction
Key differences between Log Owl and Sentry are highlighted below.

1. **Data Privacy and Security**: Log Owl places a strong emphasis on data privacy by offering on-premise deployment options, ensuring sensitive data stays within the company's own environment. On the other hand, Sentry predominantly operates as a cloud-based solution, which may raise concerns for organizations with strict data security requirements.
   
2. **Log Management Capabilities**: Log Owl focuses on providing robust log management capabilities with features like log aggregation, monitoring, and analysis. Meanwhile, Sentry primarily specializes in error tracking and crash reporting, making it a more suitable choice for organizations looking to primarily track software issues and bugs.

3. **Pricing Structure**: Log Owl follows a straightforward pricing structure based on features and the number of users. In contrast, Sentry's pricing model is based on the volume of events processed, which could potentially lead to varying costs based on usage levels for organizations.

4. **Integration Options**: Log Owl offers integrations with a wide range of tools commonly used in the DevOps landscape, ensuring seamless compatibility with existing workflows. Sentry, on the other hand, while also providing integrations, may have a more limited scope compared to Log Owl in terms of the tools it supports.

5. **User Interface and Experience**: Log Owl boasts a user-friendly interface that is intuitive and easy to navigate, catering to users with varying levels of technical expertise. Conversely, Sentry's interface may be more focused on developers and technical users, potentially requiring a steeper learning curve for those not familiar with technical complexities.

6. **Customizability and Flexibility**: Log Owl offers extensive customization options, allowing organizations to tailor the platform to their specific needs and preferences. On the contrary, while Sentry provides some level of customization, it may not offer the same degree of flexibility as Log Owl in adapting to unique requirements.

In Summary, the key differences between Log Owl and Sentry lie in data privacy, log management capabilities, pricing structure, integration options, user experience, and customizability.

Log Owl vs Sentry

Overview