Alternatives to Lombok logo

Alternatives to Lombok

Immutables, Kotlin, Spring, Jackson, and JavaScript are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Lombok.
156
85
+ 1
0

What is Lombok and what are its top alternatives?

It is a java library that automatically plugs into your editor and build tools, spicing up your java. Never write another getter or equals method again, with one annotation your class has a fully featured builder, Automate your logging variables, and much more.
Lombok is a tool in the Java Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Lombok

  • Immutables
    Immutables

    Generate state of the art immutable objects and builders. Type-safe, null-safe, and thread-safe, with no boilerplate. Generate builders for immutable objects and even plain static factory methods. ...

  • Kotlin
    Kotlin

    Kotlin is a statically typed programming language for the JVM, Android and the browser, 100% interoperable with Java ...

  • Spring
    Spring

    A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments. ...

  • Jackson
    Jackson

    It is a suite of data-processing tools for Java (and the JVM platform), including the flagship streaming JSON parser / generator library, matching data-binding library (POJOs to and from JSON) and additional data format modules to process data encoded in Avro, BSON, CBOR, CSV, Smile, (Java) Properties, Protobuf, XML or YAML; and even the large set of data format modules to support data types of widely used data types such as Guava, Joda. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Python
    Python

    Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • HTML5
    HTML5

    HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997. ...

Lombok alternatives & related posts

Immutables logo

Immutables

13
0
Java annotation processors to generate simple, safe and consistent value objects
13
0
PROS OF IMMUTABLES
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF IMMUTABLES
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Immutables posts

      Kotlin logo

      Kotlin

      15.6K
      648
      Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript
      15.6K
      648
      PROS OF KOTLIN
      • 73
        Interoperable with Java
      • 55
        Functional Programming support
      • 51
        Null Safety
      • 46
        Official Android support
      • 44
        Backed by JetBrains
      • 37
        Concise
      • 36
        Modern Multiplatform Applications
      • 28
        Expressive Syntax
      • 27
        Target to JVM
      • 26
        Coroutines
      • 24
        Open Source
      • 19
        Statically Typed
      • 19
        Practical elegance
      • 17
        Android support
      • 17
        Type Inference
      • 14
        Readable code
      • 13
        Powerful as Scala, simple as Python, plus coroutines <3
      • 12
        Better Java
      • 10
        Pragmatic
      • 9
        Lambda
      • 8
        Better language for android
      • 8
        Expressive DSLs
      • 8
        Target to JavaScript
      • 6
        Used for Android
      • 6
        Less boilerplate code
      • 5
        Fast Programming language
      • 5
        Less code
      • 4
        Native
      • 4
        Less boiler plate code
      • 4
        Friendly community
      • 4
        Functional Programming Language
      • 3
        Spring
      • 3
        Official Google Support
      • 2
        Latest version of Java
      • 1
        Well-compromised featured Java alternative
      CONS OF KOTLIN
      • 7
        Java interop makes users write Java in Kotlin
      • 4
        Frequent use of {} keys
      • 2
        Hard to make teams adopt the Kotlin style
      • 2
        Nonullpointer Exception
      • 1
        Friendly community
      • 1
        Slow compiler
      • 1
        No boiler plate code

      related Kotlin posts

      Shivam Bhargava
      AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd. · | 22 upvotes · 910.9K views

      Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

      What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

      See more
      Jakub Olan
      Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 850.6K views

      In our company we have think a lot about languages that we're willing to use, there we have considering Java, Python and C++ . All of there languages are old and well developed at fact but that's not ideology of araclx. We've choose a edge technologies such as Node.js , Rust , Kotlin and Go as our programming languages which is some kind of fun. Node.js is one of biggest trends of 2019, same for Go. We want to grow in our company with growth of languages we have choose, and probably when we would choose Java that would be almost impossible because larger languages move on today's market slower, and cannot have big changes.

      See more
      Spring logo

      Spring

      4K
      1.1K
      Provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications
      4K
      1.1K
      PROS OF SPRING
      • 230
        Java
      • 157
        Open source
      • 136
        Great community
      • 123
        Very powerful
      • 114
        Enterprise
      • 64
        Lot of great subprojects
      • 60
        Easy setup
      • 44
        Convention , configuration, done
      • 40
        Standard
      • 31
        Love the logic
      • 13
        Good documentation
      • 11
        Dependency injection
      • 11
        Stability
      • 9
        MVC
      • 6
        Easy
      • 3
        Makes the hard stuff fun & the easy stuff automatic
      • 3
        Strong typing
      • 2
        Code maintenance
      • 2
        Best practices
      • 2
        Maven
      • 2
        Great Desgin
      • 2
        Easy Integration with Spring Security
      • 2
        Integrations with most other Java frameworks
      • 1
        Java has more support and more libraries
      • 1
        Supports vast databases
      • 1
        Large ecosystem with seamless integration
      • 1
        OracleDb integration
      • 1
        Live project
      CONS OF SPRING
      • 15
        Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat
      • 4
        Poor documentation
      • 3
        Verbose configuration
      • 3
        Java
      • 2
        Java is more verbose language in compare to python
      • 1
        Very difficult

      related Spring posts

      Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

      Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

      See more

      I am consulting for a company that wants to move its current CubeCart e-commerce site to another PHP based platform like PrestaShop or Magento. I was interested in alternatives that utilize Node.js as the primary platform. I currently don't know PHP, but I have done full stack dev with Java, Spring, Thymeleaf, etc.. I am just unsure that learning a set of technologies not commonly used makes sense. For example, in PrestaShop, I would need to work with JavaScript better and learn PHP, Twig, and Bootstrap. It seems more cumbersome than a Node JS system, where the language syntax stays the same for the full stack. I am looking for thoughts and advice on the relevance of PHP skillset into the future AND whether the Node based e-commerce open source options can compete with Magento or Prestashop.

      See more
      Jackson logo

      Jackson

      224
      0
      A suite of data-processing tools for Java
      224
      0
      PROS OF JACKSON
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF JACKSON
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Jackson posts

          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          370.6K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          370.6K
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 899
            Fast
          • 746
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Easy
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Nice
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Easy to learn and test
          • 1
            Love it
          • 1
            Test
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Python logo

          Python

          250.1K
          6.9K
          A clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.
          250.1K
          6.9K
          PROS OF PYTHON
          • 1.2K
            Great libraries
          • 965
            Readable code
          • 848
            Beautiful code
          • 789
            Rapid development
          • 692
            Large community
          • 439
            Open source
          • 394
            Elegant
          • 283
            Great community
          • 274
            Object oriented
          • 222
            Dynamic typing
          • 78
            Great standard library
          • 62
            Very fast
          • 56
            Functional programming
          • 52
            Easy to learn
          • 47
            Scientific computing
          • 36
            Great documentation
          • 30
            Productivity
          • 29
            Matlab alternative
          • 29
            Easy to read
          • 25
            Simple is better than complex
          • 21
            It's the way I think
          • 20
            Imperative
          • 19
            Very programmer and non-programmer friendly
          • 19
            Free
          • 17
            Powerfull language
          • 17
            Machine learning support
          • 16
            Fast and simple
          • 14
            Scripting
          • 12
            Explicit is better than implicit
          • 11
            Ease of development
          • 10
            Clear and easy and powerfull
          • 9
            Unlimited power
          • 8
            It's lean and fun to code
          • 8
            Import antigravity
          • 7
            Print "life is short, use python"
          • 7
            Python has great libraries for data processing
          • 6
            Although practicality beats purity
          • 6
            Fast coding and good for competitions
          • 6
            There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious
          • 6
            High Documented language
          • 6
            Readability counts
          • 6
            Rapid Prototyping
          • 6
            I love snakes
          • 6
            Now is better than never
          • 6
            Flat is better than nested
          • 6
            Great for tooling
          • 5
            Great for analytics
          • 5
            Web scraping
          • 5
            Lists, tuples, dictionaries
          • 4
            Complex is better than complicated
          • 4
            Socially engaged community
          • 4
            Plotting
          • 4
            Beautiful is better than ugly
          • 4
            Easy to learn and use
          • 4
            Easy to setup and run smooth
          • 4
            Simple and easy to learn
          • 4
            Multiple Inheritence
          • 4
            CG industry needs
          • 3
            List comprehensions
          • 3
            Powerful language for AI
          • 3
            Flexible and easy
          • 3
            It is Very easy , simple and will you be love programmi
          • 3
            Many types of collections
          • 3
            If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a g
          • 3
            If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad id
          • 3
            Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules
          • 3
            Pip install everything
          • 3
            No cruft
          • 3
            Generators
          • 3
            Import this
          • 2
            Can understand easily who are new to programming
          • 2
            Securit
          • 2
            Should START with this but not STICK with This
          • 2
            A-to-Z
          • 2
            Because of Netflix
          • 2
            Only one way to do it
          • 2
            Better outcome
          • 2
            Good for hacking
          • 2
            Batteries included
          • 2
            Procedural programming
          • 1
            Sexy af
          • 1
            Automation friendly
          • 1
            Slow
          • 1
            Best friend for NLP
          • 0
            Powerful
          • 0
            Keep it simple
          • 0
            Ni
          CONS OF PYTHON
          • 53
            Still divided between python 2 and python 3
          • 28
            Performance impact
          • 26
            Poor syntax for anonymous functions
          • 22
            GIL
          • 19
            Package management is a mess
          • 14
            Too imperative-oriented
          • 12
            Hard to understand
          • 12
            Dynamic typing
          • 12
            Very slow
          • 8
            Indentations matter a lot
          • 8
            Not everything is expression
          • 7
            Incredibly slow
          • 7
            Explicit self parameter in methods
          • 6
            Requires C functions for dynamic modules
          • 6
            Poor DSL capabilities
          • 6
            No anonymous functions
          • 5
            Fake object-oriented programming
          • 5
            Threading
          • 5
            The "lisp style" whitespaces
          • 5
            Official documentation is unclear.
          • 5
            Hard to obfuscate
          • 5
            Circular import
          • 4
            Lack of Syntax Sugar leads to "the pyramid of doom"
          • 4
            The benevolent-dictator-for-life quit
          • 4
            Not suitable for autocomplete
          • 2
            Meta classes
          • 1
            Training wheels (forced indentation)

          related Python posts

          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 13.3M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          TensorFlowTensorFlowDjangoDjangoPythonPython

          Hi, I have an LMS application, currently developed in Python-Django.

          It works all very well, students can view their classes and submit exams, but I have noticed that some students are sharing exam answers with other students and let's say they already have a model of the exams.

          I want with the help of artificial intelligence, the exams to have different questions and in a different order for each student, what technology should I learn to develop something like this? I am a Python-Django developer but my focus is on web development, I have never touched anything from A.I.

          What do you think about TensorFlow?

          Please, I would appreciate all your ideas and opinions, thank you very much in advance.

          See more
          Node.js logo

          Node.js

          192.8K
          8.5K
          A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
          192.8K
          8.5K
          PROS OF NODE.JS
          • 1.4K
            Npm
          • 1.3K
            Javascript
          • 1.1K
            Great libraries
          • 1K
            High-performance
          • 805
            Open source
          • 487
            Great for apis
          • 477
            Asynchronous
          • 425
            Great community
          • 390
            Great for realtime apps
          • 296
            Great for command line utilities
          • 86
            Websockets
          • 84
            Node Modules
          • 69
            Uber Simple
          • 59
            Great modularity
          • 58
            Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
          • 42
            Easy to start
          • 35
            Great for Data Streaming
          • 32
            Realtime
          • 28
            Awesome
          • 25
            Non blocking IO
          • 18
            Can be used as a proxy
          • 17
            High performance, open source, scalable
          • 16
            Non-blocking and modular
          • 15
            Easy and Fun
          • 14
            Easy and powerful
          • 13
            Future of BackEnd
          • 13
            Same lang as AngularJS
          • 12
            Fullstack
          • 11
            Fast
          • 10
            Scalability
          • 10
            Cross platform
          • 9
            Simple
          • 8
            Mean Stack
          • 7
            Great for webapps
          • 7
            Easy concurrency
          • 6
            Typescript
          • 6
            Fast, simple code and async
          • 6
            React
          • 6
            Friendly
          • 5
            Control everything
          • 5
            Its amazingly fast and scalable
          • 5
            Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
          • 5
            Scalable
          • 5
            Great speed
          • 5
            Fast development
          • 4
            It's fast
          • 4
            Easy to use
          • 4
            Isomorphic coolness
          • 3
            Great community
          • 3
            Not Python
          • 3
            Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
          • 3
            TypeScript Support
          • 3
            Blazing fast
          • 3
            Performant and fast prototyping
          • 3
            Easy to learn
          • 3
            Easy
          • 3
            Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
          • 3
            One language, end-to-end
          • 3
            Less boilerplate code
          • 2
            Npm i ape-updating
          • 2
            Event Driven
          • 2
            Lovely
          • 1
            Creat for apis
          • 0
            Node
          CONS OF NODE.JS
          • 46
            Bound to a single CPU
          • 45
            New framework every day
          • 40
            Lots of terrible examples on the internet
          • 33
            Asynchronous programming is the worst
          • 24
            Callback
          • 19
            Javascript
          • 11
            Dependency hell
          • 11
            Dependency based on GitHub
          • 10
            Low computational power
          • 7
            Very very Slow
          • 7
            Can block whole server easily
          • 7
            Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
          • 4
            Breaking updates
          • 4
            Unstable
          • 3
            Unneeded over complication
          • 3
            No standard approach
          • 1
            Bad transitive dependency management
          • 1
            Can't read server session

          related Node.js posts

          Anurag Maurya

          Needs advice on code coverage tool in Node.js/ExpressJS with External API Testing Framework

          Hello community,

          I have a web application with the backend developed using Node.js and Express.js. The backend server is in one directory, and I have a separate API testing framework, made using SuperTest, Mocha, and Chai, in another directory. The testing framework pings the API, retrieves responses, and performs validations.

          I'm currently looking for a code coverage tool that can accurately measure the code coverage of my backend code when triggered by the API testing framework. I've tried using Istanbul and NYC with instrumented code, but the results are not as expected.

          Could you please recommend a reliable code coverage tool or suggest an approach to effectively measure the code coverage of my Node.js/Express.js backend code in this setup?

          See more
          Shared insights
          on
          Node.jsNode.jsGraphQLGraphQLMongoDBMongoDB

          I just finished the very first version of my new hobby project: #MovieGeeks. It is a minimalist online movie catalog for you to save the movies you want to see and for rating the movies you already saw. This is just the beginning as I am planning to add more features on the lines of sharing and discovery

          For the #BackEnd I decided to use Node.js , GraphQL and MongoDB:

          1. Node.js has a huge community so it will always be a safe choice in terms of libraries and finding solutions to problems you may have

          2. GraphQL because I needed to improve my skills with it and because I was never comfortable with the usual REST approach. I believe GraphQL is a better option as it feels more natural to write apis, it improves the development velocity, by definition it fixes the over-fetching and under-fetching problem that is so common on REST apis, and on top of that, the community is getting bigger and bigger.

          3. MongoDB was my choice for the database as I already have a lot of experience working on it and because, despite of some bad reputation it has acquired in the last months, I still believe it is a powerful database for at least a very long list of use cases such as the one I needed for my website

          See more
          HTML5 logo

          HTML5

          152.9K
          2.2K
          5th major revision of the core language of the World Wide Web
          152.9K
          2.2K
          PROS OF HTML5
          • 448
            New doctype
          • 389
            Local storage
          • 334
            Canvas
          • 285
            Semantic header and footer
          • 240
            Video element
          • 121
            Geolocation
          • 106
            Form autofocus
          • 100
            Email inputs
          • 85
            Editable content
          • 79
            Application caches
          • 10
            Easy to use
          • 9
            Cleaner Code
          • 5
            Easy
          • 4
            Websockets
          • 4
            Semantical
          • 3
            Audio element
          • 3
            Content focused
          • 3
            Better
          • 3
            Modern
          • 2
            Compatible
          • 2
            Very easy to learning to HTML
          • 2
            Semantic Header and Footer, Geolocation, New Doctype
          • 2
            Portability
          CONS OF HTML5
          • 2
            Easy to forget the tags when you're a begginner
          • 1
            Long and winding code

          related HTML5 posts

          Shared insights
          on
          MySQLMySQLPHPPHPJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5

          Hey guys, I need some advice on one thing. Currently, I am a fresher and know HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, PHP and, MySQL. Recently I got a client project through one of my friends and he wants me to build an E-learning Management System. Are these skills enough to build an LMS website?

          Thanks in advance!! ;)

          See more
          Jan Vlnas
          Senior Software Engineer at Mews · | 26 upvotes · 479.8K views
          Shared insights
          on
          HTML5HTML5JavaScriptJavaScriptNext.jsNext.js

          Few years ago we were building a Next.js site with a few simple forms. This required handling forms validation and submission, but instead of picking some forms library, we went with plain JavaScript and constraint validation API in HTML5. This shaved off a few KBs of dependencies and gave us full control over the validation behavior and look. I describe this approach, with its pros and cons, in a blog post.

          See more