OpenCensus vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

OpenCensus

Stacks644

Followers21

Votes0

OpenCensus vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

When considering monitoring and observability tools, it's essential to understand the key differences between OpenCensus and Zabbix.

Architecture: OpenCensus is a set of libraries that collect traces, metrics, and other observability data to send to various backends, promoting compatibility and flexibility. In contrast, Zabbix is a single integrated platform that offers monitoring, alerting, and visualization, providing a more unified solution to monitoring needs.
Focus: OpenCensus focuses on providing a vendor-agnostic way to collect telemetry data, making it easier to integrate with different services and backends. On the other hand, Zabbix is more focused on being an all-in-one monitoring solution, offering a comprehensive set of features for monitoring and management within a single platform.
Community and Ecosystem: OpenCensus has a robust community supporting its development, with contributions from various organizations and individuals, ensuring ongoing updates and enhancements. Zabbix also has an active community but is primarily driven by the Zabbix company, influencing the direction of its development and features.
Flexibility: OpenCensus offers flexibility in terms of data collection, allowing users to choose different backends and customize their telemetry data collection based on specific requirements. Zabbix, while providing a wide range of features, may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility in data collection methods.
Scalability: OpenCensus is designed to scale easily and efficiently, handling a high volume of telemetry data across distributed systems with minimal impact on performance. Zabbix, while scalable to a certain extent, may require additional configuration and resources to handle larger-scale monitoring needs effectively.
Integration with Other Tools: OpenCensus is built with a focus on interoperability and can easily integrate with other observability tools and platforms, allowing for a more seamless monitoring experience. Zabbix, while offering a comprehensive solution, may have limitations in integrating with certain third-party tools or services, potentially restricting its functionality in complex environments.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between OpenCensus and Zabbix is crucial in choosing the right monitoring and observability tool for specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, OpenCensus

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	OpenCensus
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	It is a set of libraries for various languages that allow you to collect application metrics and distributed traces, then transfer the data to a backend of your choice in real time. This data can be analyzed by developers and admins to understand the health of the application and debug problems.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	Standard wire protocols; Consistent APIs for handling trace and metric data
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 644
Followers 981	Followers 21
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Prometheus Stackdriver Datadog SignalFx Zipkin LightStep Jaeger Wavefront Solarwinds Postmates API

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, OpenCensus?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Datadog

Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

OpenCensus vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction

When considering monitoring and observability tools, it's essential to understand the key differences between OpenCensus and Zabbix.

Architecture: OpenCensus is a set of libraries that collect traces, metrics, and other observability data to send to various backends, promoting compatibility and flexibility. In contrast, Zabbix is a single integrated platform that offers monitoring, alerting, and visualization, providing a more unified solution to monitoring needs.
Focus: OpenCensus focuses on providing a vendor-agnostic way to collect telemetry data, making it easier to integrate with different services and backends. On the other hand, Zabbix is more focused on being an all-in-one monitoring solution, offering a comprehensive set of features for monitoring and management within a single platform.
Community and Ecosystem: OpenCensus has a robust community supporting its development, with contributions from various organizations and individuals, ensuring ongoing updates and enhancements. Zabbix also has an active community but is primarily driven by the Zabbix company, influencing the direction of its development and features.
Flexibility: OpenCensus offers flexibility in terms of data collection, allowing users to choose different backends and customize their telemetry data collection based on specific requirements. Zabbix, while providing a wide range of features, may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility in data collection methods.
Scalability: OpenCensus is designed to scale easily and efficiently, handling a high volume of telemetry data across distributed systems with minimal impact on performance. Zabbix, while scalable to a certain extent, may require additional configuration and resources to handle larger-scale monitoring needs effectively.
Integration with Other Tools: OpenCensus is built with a focus on interoperability and can easily integrate with other observability tools and platforms, allowing for a more seamless monitoring experience. Zabbix, while offering a comprehensive solution, may have limitations in integrating with certain third-party tools or services, potentially restricting its functionality in complex environments.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between OpenCensus and Zabbix is crucial in choosing the right monitoring and observability tool for specific needs.