StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Pact vs Swagger Codegen

Pact vs Swagger Codegen

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
Stacks194
Followers163
Votes1
GitHub Stars17.6K
Forks6.0K
Pact
Pact
Stacks59
Followers79
Votes0
GitHub Stars221
Forks90

Pact vs Swagger Codegen: What are the differences?

Introduction

Pact and Swagger Codegen are both tools commonly used in web development projects. While both serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration Level: Pact focuses on providing contract testing capabilities for microservices or APIs, ensuring that the providers and consumers agree on the contracts before implementation. On the other hand, Swagger Codegen is primarily used for generating client SDKs or server stubs based on an API specification such as Swagger (now known as OpenAPI).

  2. Testing Approach: Pact uses consumer-driven contract testing, where the consumers define the expected interactions and behaviors of the provider. It ensures that the provider accurately fulfills the expectations defined by the consumers. Conversely, Swagger Codegen does not have specific testing capabilities and is mostly used for code generation purposes.

  3. Programming Languages Supported: Pact supports a wide range of programming languages, allowing developers to implement contract testing in their preferred language. Swagger Codegen also supports multiple programming languages but mainly focuses on generating code in those languages based on the API specification.

  4. Workflow: In the case of Pact, the contract testing workflow involves defining the pact files, mocking the provider based on those contracts, and verifying them during the test phase. With Swagger Codegen, the workflow revolves around defining the API specification using the OpenAPI specification format and generating the code stubs or SDKs based on that specification.

  5. Focus: Pact emphasizes the collaboration between the consumer and provider teams by ensuring that the communication between them remains accurate and consistent through contract testing. On the other hand, Swagger Codegen emphasizes automation and code generation to speed up the development process and maintain consistency across different platforms.

  6. Maturity and Ecosystem: Pact has been widely adopted by companies and has a well-established ecosystem supporting its features. It provides extensive documentation, community support, and integration with popular testing frameworks. Swagger Codegen, on the other hand, is a widely used code generation tool with good community support but may not have the same level of maturity and ecosystem as Pact.

In summary, Pact focuses on contract testing for microservices or APIs, involving collaboration between consumer and provider teams, while Swagger Codegen is mainly used for code generation based on API specifications, enabling automation and maintaining consistency across platforms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Swagger Codegen
Swagger Codegen
Pact
Pact

It is an open source project which allows generation of API client libraries (SDK generation), server stubs, and documentation automatically from an OpenAPI Specification.

It is a code-first tool for testing HTTP and message integrations using contract tests. Contract tests assert that inter-application messages conform to a shared understanding that is documented in a contract. Without contract testing, the only way to ensure that applications will work correctly together is by using expensive and brittle integration tests.

Generate client SDKs in over 40 different languages for end developers to easily integrate with your API; Always updated with the latest and greatest changes in the programming world; Remove tedious plumbing and configuration by generating boilerplate server code in over 20 different languages
Support for JavaScript, JVM, .NET, Python, Go, Ruby, PHP, Swift and more; Get fast, reliable feedback on the compatibility of your integrations; Ensures all your services are compatible with each other before you deploy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.6K
GitHub Stars
221
GitHub Forks
6.0K
GitHub Forks
90
Stacks
194
Stacks
59
Followers
163
Followers
79
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    SDK Generation
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Objective-C
Objective-C
Swift
Swift
JavaScript
JavaScript
Linux
Linux
C++
C++
Perl
Perl
Java
Java
Golang
Golang
TypeScript
TypeScript
Ruby
Ruby
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Golang
Golang
PHP
PHP
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to Swagger Codegen, Pact?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp