StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Prettier vs SonarQube

Prettier vs SonarQube

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SonarQube
SonarQube
Stacks1.9K
Followers2.0K
Votes53
GitHub Stars10.0K
Forks2.1K
Prettier
Prettier
Stacks13.2K
Followers1.3K
Votes7
GitHub Stars51.1K
Forks4.6K

Prettier vs SonarQube: What are the differences?

Introduction

Prettier and SonarQube are both tools used in software development to improve code quality. They have distinct features and functionalities, which make them suitable for different purposes. In this article, we will outline the key differences between Prettier and SonarQube.

  1. Code Formatting: Prettier is primarily focused on code formatting. It automatically formats code according to a predefined set of rules, ensuring consistent styling throughout a project. It can be used with multiple programming languages and is widely known for its ability to automatically format complex code. On the other hand, SonarQube, while providing some degree of code formatting, has a broader scope that encompasses various aspects of code quality such as code smell detection, bug detection, and security vulnerabilities.

  2. Static Code Analysis: SonarQube is a comprehensive static code analysis tool. It performs a deep analysis of codebases and identifies potential issues such as bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells. It supports a wide range of programming languages and provides detailed reports and metrics to help developers address these issues effectively. Prettier, on the other hand, does not perform static code analysis and focuses solely on code formatting.

  3. Integration: Prettier can be seamlessly integrated into the development workflow using plugins or by configuring it as a pre-commit hook. It can be integrated with popular code editors and CI/CD tools, enabling automated code formatting. SonarQube, on the other hand, requires setup and configuration as a separate service. It can be integrated into the CI/CD pipeline to continuously monitor code quality, detect issues, and provide feedback to the development team.

  4. Scope: Prettier is designed to format code and enforce consistent code styling. It does not provide specific rules or checks for issues like security vulnerabilities or code smells. SonarQube, on the other hand, offers a wide range of rules and checks for different aspects of code quality. It covers a broader spectrum of code quality-related issues, making it a preferred choice for projects that require comprehensive code analysis.

  5. Ease of Use: Prettier aims to provide a simple and easy-to-use code formatting experience. It has a minimal configuration approach and automates the process of formatting code. SonarQube, on the other hand, requires more setup and configuration to perform static code analysis. It offers a powerful set of features but may require additional effort to fully leverage its capabilities.

In summary, Prettier focuses on code formatting and provides a quick and easy way to enforce consistent code styling. SonarQube, on the other hand, is a powerful static code analysis tool that goes beyond code formatting and offers comprehensive features for identifying bugs, security vulnerabilities, and code smells. The choice between Prettier and SonarQube depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on SonarQube, Prettier

Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

SonarQube
SonarQube
Prettier
Prettier

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

Prettier is an opinionated code formatter. It enforces a consistent style by parsing your code and re-printing it with its own rules that take the maximum line length into account, wrapping code when necessary.

Multi-language;Detect tricky issues;Security analysis;Enhance your workflow
An opinionated code formatter; Supports many languages; Integrates with most editors; Has few options; You press save and code is formatted; No need to discuss style in code review; Saves you time and energy
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.0K
GitHub Stars
51.1K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
4.6K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
13.2K
Followers
2.0K
Followers
1.3K
Votes
53
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Tracks code complexity and smell trends
  • 16
    IDE Integration
  • 9
    Complete code Review
  • 2
    Difficult to deploy
Cons
  • 7
    Paid support is poor, techs arrogant and unhelpful
  • 7
    Sales process is long and unfriendly
  • 1
    Does not integrate with Snyk
Pros
  • 2
    Customizable
  • 1
    Completely free
  • 1
    Atom/VSCode package
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Runs offline
Integrations
Gradle
Gradle
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity
Appveyor
Appveyor
Travis CI
Travis CI
Apache Ant
Apache Ant
Bamboo
Bamboo
GraphQL
GraphQL
JavaScript
JavaScript
TypeScript
TypeScript
Flow
Flow
Vue.js
Vue.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
markdown
markdown
YAML
YAML
Less
Less

What are some alternatives to SonarQube, Prettier?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana