Amazon SQS vs. ActiveMQ



  • -
  • 6
  • 1.84K
  • -
  • 50
  • 4.88K
No public GitHub repository stats available

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon SQS?
Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Why do developers choose ActiveMQ?
Why do you like ActiveMQ?

What are the cons of using Amazon SQS?
Downsides of Amazon SQS?

What are the cons of using ActiveMQ?
No Cons submitted yet for ActiveMQ
Downsides of ActiveMQ?

How much does Amazon SQS cost?
Amazon SQS Pricing
How much does ActiveMQ cost?
What companies use Amazon SQS?
447 companies on StackShare use Amazon SQS
What companies use ActiveMQ?
43 companies on StackShare use ActiveMQ
What tools integrate with Amazon SQS?
6 tools on StackShare integrate with Amazon SQS
What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
4 tools on StackShare integrate with ActiveMQ

What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS and ActiveMQ?

  • RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is a messaging broker - an intermediary for messaging
  • Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
  • Celery - Distributed task queue
  • ZeroMQ - Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort

See all alternatives to Amazon SQS

New CloudWatch Events – Track and Respond to Changes...
Rapid Auto Scaling with Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS – New Dead Letter Queue


Interest Over Time