Aerobatic vs Google App Engine vs Heroku

Aerobatic
Aerobatic

3
2
0
Google App Engine
Google App Engine

2.4K
606
160
Heroku
Heroku

7.1K
3.1K
904
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Aerobatic?

In a nutshell, it's a platform as a service (PaaS) for HTML5 web apps. You could think of it as Heroku for the front-end. It provides a streamlined developer workflow and a suite of cloud-based smart hosting modules that are highly complementary to your custom app code running in the browser.

What is Google App Engine?

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

What is Heroku?

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Aerobatic?
Why do developers choose Google App Engine?
Why do developers choose Heroku?
What are the cons of using Aerobatic?
What are the cons of using Google App Engine?
What are the cons of using Heroku?
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con
      What companies use Aerobatic?
      What companies use Google App Engine?
      What companies use Heroku?
        No companies found
        What are some alternatives to Aerobatic, Google App Engine, and Heroku?
        Netlify
        Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.
        BitBalloon
        BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.
        AWS Elastic Beanstalk
        Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.
        Apollo
        Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
        OpenShift
        OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.
        See all alternatives
        What tools integrate with Aerobatic?
        What tools integrate with Google App Engine?
        What tools integrate with Heroku?
        Decisions about Aerobatic, Google App Engine, and Heroku
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of Aerobatic, Google App Engine, and Heroku
        Review ofHerokuHeroku

        I use Heroku, for almost any project of mine. Their free plan is awesome for testing, solo developers or your startup and its almost impossible to not cover you somehow. Adding an add on is a simple command away and I find it easy to use it both on my Windows PC or my Linux laptop. Their documentation, covers almost everything. In particular I have used Heroku for Spring, Django and AngularJS. I even find it easier to run my project on my local dev with foreman start, than ./manage.py runserver (for my django projects). There is no place like Heroku for the developer!

        Review ofHerokuHeroku

        Can't beat the simplicity of deploying and managing apps, the pricing is a bit high, but you are paying for those streamlined tools. However, after several experiences of tracing issues back to Heroku's stack, not having visibility into what they are doing has prompted moving two applications off of it and on to other more transparent cloud solutions. Heroku is amazing for what it is, hosting for early stage products.

        Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

        With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less. And it is free (until you need extra scale). I would not recommend to use Java - python is faster and has all new appengine features.

        Pros: everything is in one place: task queue, cron, backend instances for data processing, datastore, mapreduce. Cons: you cannot easily move your code from GAE. Even with special 3rd party services.

        Review ofHerokuHeroku

        I've been using Heroku for 3 years now, they have grown super fast and each time they're improving their services. What I really like the most is how easily you can show to your client the advances on you project, it would take you maximum 15 minutes to configure two environments (Staging/Production). It is simply essential and fantastic!

        Review ofHerokuHeroku

        I liked how easy this was to use and that I could create some proof of concepts without have to pay. The downside for NodeJS is remote debugging. Pretty much have to depend on logging where Azure allows remote debugging with Node Inspector.

        Review ofHerokuHeroku

        Using Heroku takes away all the pains associated with managing compute and backing services. It may require a little extra optimisation and tweaks, but these constraints often make your app better anyway.

        Review ofGoogle App EngineGoogle App Engine

        With Cloud Endpoints you can create and deploy mobile backend in one hour or less.

        How developers use Aerobatic, Google App Engine, and Heroku
        Avatar of StackShare
        StackShare uses HerokuHeroku

        Not having to deal with servers is a huge win for us. There are certainly trade-offs (having to wait if the platform is down as opposed to being able to fix the issue), but we’re happy being on Heroku right now. Being able to focus 100% of our technical efforts on application code is immensely helpful.

        Two dynos seems to be the sweet spot for our application. We can handle traffic spikes and get pretty consistent performance otherwise.

        We have a total of four apps on Heroku: Legacy Leanstack, StackShare Prod, StackShare Staging, StackShare Dev. Protip: if you’re setting up multiple environments based on your prod environment, just run heroku fork app name. Super useful, it copies over your db, add-ons, and settings.

        We have a develop branch on GitHub that we push to dev to test out, then if everything is cool we push it to staging and eventually prod. Hotfixes of course go straight to staging and then prod usually.

        Avatar of Casey Smith
        Casey Smith uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

        PaaS for back-end components, including external data ingestion APIs, front-end web service APIs, hosting of static front-end application assets, back-end data processing pipeline microservices, APIs to storage infrastructure (Cloud SQL and Memcached), and data processing pipeline task queues and cron jobs. Task queue fan-out and auto-scaling of back-end microservice instances provide parallelism for high velocity data processing.

        Avatar of StackShare
        StackShare uses HerokuHeroku

        We keep the Metrics tab open while we load test, and hit refresh to see what’s going on: heroku metric

        I would expect the graphs to expand with some sort of detail, but that’s not the case. So these metrics aren’t very useful. The logs are far more useful, so we just keep the tail open while we test.

        Avatar of Lawrence Cheuk
        Lawrence Cheuk uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

        checking a swap require a lot of cpu resource, roster normally come out same day of month, every month, at a particular time. Which make very high spike, our flag ship product, iSwap, with the capability looking swap possibility with 10000 other rosters base on user critieria, you need a cloud computing give you this magnitude of computing power. gae did it nicely, user friendly, easy to you, low cost.

        Avatar of Tim Lucas
        Tim Lucas uses HerokuHeroku

        Heroku runs the web and background worker processes. Auto-deployments are triggered via GitHub commits and wait for the Buildkite test build to pass. Heroku pipelines with beta release phase execution (for automatically running database migrations) allowed for easy manual testing of big new releases. Web and worker logs are sent to Papertrail.

        Avatar of Jeff Flynn
        Jeff Flynn uses HerokuHeroku

        As much as I love AWS EC, I prefer Heroku for apps like this. Heroku has grown up around Rails and Ruby, massive set of add-ons that are usually one-click setup, and I once had to perform an emergency app scale-up a that I completed in seconds from my mobile phone whilst riding the Bangkok subway. Doesn't get much easier than that.

        Avatar of Matt Welke
        Matt Welke uses HerokuHeroku

        Used for proofs of concept and personal projects where I want to remain in a free tier (as opposed to a service like DigitalOcean), and application state must outlive an HTTP request/response cycle.

        Heroku Postgres sometimes used as a free tier PostgreSQL managed database linked to non-Heroku apps, for example AWS Lambda.

        Avatar of CommentBox.io
        CommentBox.io uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

        App engine fills in the gaps in the increasingly smaller case where it's necessary for us to run our own APIs.

        Avatar of Abhijeet Gokar
        Abhijeet Gokar uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

        Very easy to make cloud computing of ML models , and use containers like Kubernetes.

        Avatar of Vamsi Krishna
        Vamsi Krishna uses Google App EngineGoogle App Engine

        Cloud instances to run our app, Cloud MySQL , Network Load Balancer

        How much does Aerobatic cost?
        How much does Google App Engine cost?
        How much does Heroku cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Aerobatic
        More news