StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Amazon S3 vs CloudAMQP

Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Amazon S3 vs CloudAMQP

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks54.0K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP
Stacks63
Followers84
Votes7
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora
Stacks819
Followers744
Votes55

Amazon RDS for Aurora vs Amazon S3 vs CloudAMQP: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide a comparison between Amazon RDS for Aurora, Amazon S3, and CloudAMQP. We will highlight the key differences between these services, specifically focusing on their functionalities and use cases.

  1. Scalability and Performance: Amazon RDS for Aurora is a highly scalable and performant relational database service, designed to handle large workloads and provide consistent performance. It uses a distributed architecture with auto-scaling capabilities to accommodate growing storage and compute needs. On the other hand, Amazon S3 is an object storage service primarily designed for storing and retrieving large amounts of data. It offers excellent scalability and can handle a virtually unlimited number of objects, making it ideal for data lakes and backup repositories. CloudAMQP, on the other hand, is a managed message queuing service that focuses on scalability and high-performance messaging. It provides efficient message handling and delivery, making it suitable for event-driven architectures.

  2. Data Structure and Querying: Amazon RDS for Aurora supports traditional SQL databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL, providing support for complex querying and ACID transactions. It is suitable for applications that require strong relational database capabilities. Amazon S3, on the other hand, is an object storage service that does not provide structured querying capabilities like SQL. Instead, it offers simple key-value object retrieval using a unique identifier. It is commonly used for storing and retrieving unstructured or semi-structured data like documents, images, and videos. CloudAMQP is a messaging service and does not provide querying capabilities like a traditional database. It focuses on efficient message routing and delivery.

  3. Data Consistency and Durability: Amazon RDS for Aurora ensures data consistency by using multiple replicas in different availability zones. It provides immediate consistency for both reads and writes, ensuring that data is always up to date. It also offers automated backups and point-in-time recovery options to protect data. Amazon S3, on the other hand, provides eventual consistency for object updates, which means that it may take some time for updates to propagate across all regions. However, it provides 11 nines (99.999999999%) of durability for stored objects, making it highly reliable. CloudAMQP ensures message delivery by using redundant RabbitMQ clusters and offers message persistence options for guaranteeing message durability.

  4. Storage and Pricing Model: Amazon RDS for Aurora provisions storage based on the allocated database instance size, with additional storage capacity for growth. It uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where you pay for the compute and storage resources. Amazon S3 provides separate pricing for storage, data transfer, and requests. It offers highly affordable storage costs and a tiered pricing structure based on storage class and retrieval frequency. CloudAMQP pricing is based on the chosen plan and usage, with different plans catering to different message throughputs and features. It offers flexibility in selecting the required plan based on messaging requirements.

  5. Managed Service and Administration: Amazon RDS for Aurora is a fully managed service, which means that Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure, patching, and maintenance tasks. It offers automated backups, replication, and automatic software updates. Amazon S3 is also a fully managed service, handling replication, monitoring, and data integrity checks. However, it does not provide built-in database management capabilities like Amazon RDS for Aurora. CloudAMQP is a fully managed messaging service, handling infrastructure management, scaling, and monitoring of RabbitMQ clusters. It offers easy integration with various cloud platforms and simplifies message-oriented application development.

  6. Use Cases and Application Scenarios: AWS RDS for Aurora is suitable for applications that require a highly available, scalable, and reliable relational database. It can be used for a wide range of use cases, including transactional workloads, content management systems, and e-commerce platforms. Amazon S3 is ideal for storing and retrieving large amounts of unstructured data, such as media files, logs, and backups. It is commonly used for data lakes, content delivery, static website hosting, and archiving. CloudAMQP is designed for scenarios where reliable messaging and event-driven architectures are required. It is used in various applications, including microservices, IoT data processing, and real-time analytics.

In summary, Amazon RDS for Aurora is a scalable and performant relational database service, Amazon S3 is an object storage service for large-scale data storage, and CloudAMQP is a managed messaging service for efficient message handling. Each service has different strengths and use cases, making them suitable for various types of applications and workloads.

Advice on Amazon S3, CloudAMQP, Amazon Aurora

Mickael
Mickael

DevOps Engineer at Rookout

Mar 1, 2020

Decided

In addition to being a lot cheaper, Google Cloud Pub/Sub allowed us to not worry about maintaining any more infrastructure that needed.

We moved from a self-hosted RabbitMQ over to CloudAMQP and decided that since we use GCP anyway, why not try their managed PubSub?

It is one of the better decisions that we made, and we can just focus about building more important stuff!

472k views472k
Comments
Mohammad
Mohammad

Aug 30, 2020

Needs adviceonBackblaze B2 Cloud StorageBackblaze B2 Cloud StoragePHPPHPLaravelLaravel

Hello! I have a mobile app with nearly 100k MAU, and I want to add a cloud file storage service to my app.

My app will allow users to store their image, video, and audio files and retrieve them to their device when necessary.

I have already decided to use PHP & Laravel as my backend, and I use Contabo VPS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are:

  • Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. Closest to my users (MENA Region) for other services, I will have to go to Europe. Not sure how important this is?

  • DigitalOcean Spaces : Seems like my best option for price/service, but I am still not sure

  • Wasabi: the best price (6 USD/MONTH/TB) and free bandwidth, but I am not sure if it fits my needs as I want to allow my users to preview audio and video files. They don't recommend their service for streaming videos.

  • Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: Good price but not sure about them.

  • There is also the self-hosted s3 compatible option, but I am not sure about that.

Any thoughts will be helpful. Also, if you think I should post in a different sub, please tell me.

180k views180k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
CloudAMQP
CloudAMQP
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Fully managed, highly available RabbitMQ servers and clusters, on all major compute platforms.

Amazon Aurora is a MySQL-compatible, relational database engine that combines the speed and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open source databases. Amazon Aurora provides up to five times better performance than MySQL at a price point one tenth that of a commercial database while delivering similar performance and availability.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
Support - 24/7 support, via email, chat and phone.; Real time metrics and alarms - Get notified in advanced when your queues are growing faster than you're consuming them, when you're servers are over loaded etc. and take action before it becomes a problem.; Auto-healing - Our monitoring systems automatically detects and fixes a lot of problems such as kernel bugs, auto-restarts, RabbitMQ/Erlang version upgrades etc.; Metrics - Of course the default RabbitMQ interface is available, which gives you great inspection capabilities of your queues and message throughput, but we also gives you CPU, RAM and disk graphs to help you monitor the health and resource consumption of your clusters.;
High Throughput with Low Jitter;Push-button Compute Scaling;Storage Auto-scaling;Amazon Aurora Replicas;Instance Monitoring and Repair;Fault-tolerant and Self-healing Storage;Automatic, Continuous, Incremental Backups and Point-in-time Restore;Database Snapshots;Resource-level Permissions;Easy Migration;Monitoring and Metrics
Statistics
Stacks
54.0K
Stacks
63
Stacks
819
Followers
40.2K
Followers
84
Followers
744
Votes
2.0K
Votes
7
Votes
55
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up
Pros
  • 4
    Some of the best customer support you'll ever find
  • 3
    Easy to provision
Pros
  • 14
    MySQL compatibility
  • 12
    Better performance
  • 10
    Easy read scalability
  • 9
    Speed
  • 7
    Low latency read replica
Cons
  • 2
    Vendor locking
  • 1
    Rigid schema
Integrations
No integrations available
AppHarbor
AppHarbor
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Heroku
Heroku
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
SoftLayer
SoftLayer
dotCloud
dotCloud
Pivotal Web Services (PWS)
Pivotal Web Services (PWS)
AppFog
AppFog
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, CloudAMQP, Amazon Aurora?

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS

Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase