Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?
Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Kubernetes are both container orchestration platforms that allow users to manage and deploy containerized applications at scale. Here are the key differences between these two platforms:
Architecture: Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). It leverages AWS features and integrates tightly with other AWS services, providing a seamless experience for users already utilizing the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration platform that can be used with any cloud provider or on-premises infrastructure. It offers a more flexible architecture that allows users to have more control over their infrastructure setup.
Ease of Use: Amazon ECS is generally known for its simplicity and ease of use. It provides a straightforward user interface and integrates well with other AWS services, making it easier to manage and deploy containerized applications within the AWS ecosystem. Kubernetes, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve initially, with more complex configuration and setup options. It requires more hands-on management and knowledge of Kubernetes-specific concepts and components.
Scalability: Both Amazon ECS and Kubernetes offer scalability features but with slight differences. Amazon ECS offers auto-scaling capabilities out of the box, allowing users to scale container instances based on metrics and thresholds defined by the user. Kubernetes, on the other hand, provides horizontal scaling features through pod autoscaling, allowing users to automatically adjust the number of pods based on CPU or custom metrics. Kubernetes also supports vertical scaling by adjusting the resources allocated to individual pods.
Networking and Load Balancing: Amazon ECS provides built-in integration with AWS networking and load balancing services. It integrates with Amazon VPC, making it easier to manage networking configurations and secure communication between containers. Kubernetes, on the other hand, offers more flexibility in networking options, allowing users to choose between multiple container networking plugins. It also provides built-in load balancing capabilities through its service abstraction.
Storage: Amazon ECS leverages existing AWS storage services, such as Amazon EBS and Amazon EFS, for persistent storage needs. It integrates seamlessly with these services, providing a straightforward way to provision and manage persistent storage for containers. Kubernetes, on the other hand, offers the ability to use various storage solutions through its PersistentVolume and PersistentVolumeClaim objects. It supports a wide range of storage providers and allows users to choose the most suitable option for their specific needs.
Community and Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a thriving open-source community and a vast ecosystem of tools and plugins built around it. This makes it easy to find support, documentation, and third-party integrations for various use cases. Amazon ECS, being a proprietary service, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Kubernetes. While it benefits from being part of the broader AWS ecosystem, the range of available tools and plugins may be more limited.
In summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is an AWS-managed container orchestration service, simplifying the deployment and management of containerized applications. Kubernetes, an open-source container orchestration platform, offers a more portable and extensible solution for automating the deployment, scaling, and operation of application containers across diverse infrastructure environments.
If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes. EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
I chose Amazon EC2 Container Service to power our production cluster. It's mostly all managed, you just have to provide a few EC2 (for examples through an autoscaling group) to set it up. Configuration is super easy and it work really well to get a few simple http services to production.
It's no Kubernetes but is much easier to understand.
Also when we started Sqreen, it was the only managed tool available in AWS.
Pros of Amazon EC2 Container Service
- Backed by amazon100
- Familiar to ec272
- Cluster based53
- Simple API42
- Iam roles26
- Scheduler7
- Cluster management7
- Programmatic Control7
- Container-enabled applications4
- Socker support4
- No additional cost2
- Easy to use and cheap1
Pros of Kubernetes
- Leading docker container management solution166
- Simple and powerful129
- Open source107
- Backed by google76
- The right abstractions58
- Scale services25
- Replication controller20
- Permission managment11
- Supports autoscaling9
- Simple8
- Cheap8
- Self-healing6
- Open, powerful, stable5
- Reliable5
- No cloud platform lock-in5
- Promotes modern/good infrascture practice5
- Scalable4
- Quick cloud setup4
- Custom and extensibility3
- Captain of Container Ship3
- Cloud Agnostic3
- Backed by Red Hat3
- Runs on azure3
- A self healing environment with rich metadata3
- Everything of CaaS2
- Gke2
- Golang2
- Easy setup2
- Expandable2
- Sfg2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon EC2 Container Service
Cons of Kubernetes
- Steep learning curve16
- Poor workflow for development15
- Orchestrates only infrastructure8
- High resource requirements for on-prem clusters4
- Too heavy for simple systems2
- Additional vendor lock-in (Docker)1
- More moving parts to secure1
- Additional Technology Overhead1