Overview

Quay.io

Stacks64

Followers86

Votes7

Amazon ECR

Stacks371

Followers166

Votes5

Amazon ECR vs Quay.io: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Amazon ECR (Elastic Container Registry) and Quay.io. Both of these services are container registries that allow users to store, manage, and deploy container images. Here, we will outline six major differences between the two platforms.

Ownership and Hosting: Amazon ECR is a service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and is hosted on the AWS infrastructure. On the other hand, Quay.io is an independent service owned and managed by Red Hat. This difference in ownership and hosting can have implications on factors such as data security, service availability, and pricing structure.
Integration with Cloud Providers: Being part of the AWS ecosystem, Amazon ECR seamlessly integrates with various other AWS services, including Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), AWS Fargate, and AWS CodeBuild. This integration allows for easy deployment and management of containerized applications. Quay.io, however, is a more versatile service that can be integrated with any cloud provider or on-premises environment. It offers a greater degree of flexibility in terms of platform choice.
Scalability: Both Amazon ECR and Quay.io are designed to handle large-scale container deployments, but Amazon ECR has an advantage when it comes to scalability. Being built on top of AWS infrastructure, Amazon ECR can leverage the extensive resources and auto-scaling capabilities of AWS to accommodate high-demand scenarios. On the other hand, Quay.io relies on its own infrastructure and may have limitations in terms of scalability compared to Amazon ECR.
Native Tools and APIs: As part of the AWS ecosystem, Amazon ECR seamlessly integrates with various AWS tools and services, such as AWS Management Console, AWS CLI (Command Line Interface), and AWS SDKs (Software Development Kits). This tight integration allows for easier management, automation, and monitoring of container images. Quay.io, being an independent service, provides its own set of tools and APIs, which may have differences in terms of functionality and ease of use compared to AWS-native tools.
Pricing Structure and Cost: Amazon ECR and Quay.io have different pricing models. Amazon ECR follows the AWS pay-as-you-go model, where users pay only for the resources they consume. This can be advantageous for users who are already using AWS services as they can leverage existing billing and cost management infrastructure. Quay.io, on the other hand, has its own pricing model, which may be more suitable for users who do not have significant investments in the AWS ecosystem or prefer a different cost structure.
Community and Support: Both Amazon ECR and Quay.io have active developer communities and provide support resources. However, being part of the AWS ecosystem, Amazon ECR benefits from the extensive AWS user community, which provides a wealth of knowledge, resources, and community-driven support. Quay.io, being an independent service, may have a smaller but dedicated community and support channels.

In summary, Amazon ECR and Quay.io differ in ownership and hosting, integration with cloud providers, scalability, native tools and APIs, pricing structure and cost, and community and support. The choice between the two depends on factors such as platform preference, integration requirements, scalability needs, and cost considerations.

Detailed Comparison

Quay.io	Amazon ECR
Simply upload your Dockerfile (and any additional files it needs) and we'll build your Dockerfile into an image and push it to your repository.	It is a fully managed container registry that makes it easy to store, manage, share, and deploy your container images and artifacts anywhere. It eliminates the need to operate your own container repositories or worry about scaling the underlying infrastructure.
Secure - Your data is transferred using SSL at all times and encrypted when at rest. More information available in our security guide;Shareable - Have to share a repository? No problem! Share with anyone you choose;Cloud Hosted - Accessible from anywhere, anytime	Reduce your effort with a fully managed registry; Securely share and download container images; Provide fast and highly available access; Simplify your deployment workflow
Statistics
Stacks 64	Stacks 371
Followers 86	Followers 166
Votes 7	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Great UI 1 API 0 Docker cloud repositories are public by default. Bad	Pros 2 Highly secure as policies can be configured to manage p 1 Tight integration with Amazon ECS and the Docker CLI, a 1 No upfront fees or commitments. You pay only for the am 1 Familiar to AWS users and easy to use Cons 1 Lack of insight into registry usage 1 Difficult to use with docker client as it requires crea 1 Potentially expensive if the containers being deployed
Integrations
Docker	Kubernetes Docker Amazon EKS AWS IAM

What are some alternatives to Quay.io, Amazon ECR?

Harbor

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

Kraken by Uber

A P2P-powered Docker registry that focuses on scalability and availability. It is designed for Docker image management, replication and distribution in a hybrid cloud environment.

Google Container Registry

It is a single place for your team to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control.

Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public

It is a fully managed registry that makes it easy for a developer to publicly share container software worldwide for anyone to download. Anyone (with or without an AWS account) can use it to pull container software for use. Amazon ECR Public Gallery is a website that allows anyone to browse and search for public container images, view developer-provided details, and see pull commands. Developers no longer need to use different private and public registries when building and sharing their public container artifacts.