StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. CDN
  5. Amazon GuardDuty vs CloudFlare

Amazon GuardDuty vs CloudFlare

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Stacks77.3K
Followers23.1K
Votes1.8K
Amazon GuardDuty
Amazon GuardDuty
Stacks63
Followers59
Votes2

Amazon GuardDuty vs CloudFlare: What are the differences?

Introduction

Key differences between Amazon GuardDuty and CloudFlare:

  1. Detection Capability: Amazon GuardDuty primarily focuses on detecting security threats within the AWS environment, while CloudFlare offers broader detection capabilities by providing insights on threats targeting both the network and application layers. CloudFlare's extensive network visibility allows for a more comprehensive threat detection approach compared to Amazon GuardDuty.

  2. Scalability: CloudFlare is known for its ability to scale effortlessly to handle massive amounts of traffic and mitigate attacks effectively. In contrast, Amazon GuardDuty's scalability is limited to the AWS environment and may require additional configurations to handle high traffic volumes or distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks efficiently.

  3. Integration Options: Amazon GuardDuty seamlessly integrates with other AWS security services such as AWS Security Hub and AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), providing a cohesive security ecosystem within the AWS environment. On the other hand, CloudFlare offers a wide range of integrations with third-party security tools and services, allowing for a more flexible and customizable security stack tailored to specific business needs.

  4. Global Network Coverage: CloudFlare operates a vast global network of data centers that help to accelerate content delivery and improve security through distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) protection. This extensive network coverage enables CloudFlare to offer fast and secure access to websites and applications worldwide, making it a preferred choice for organizations with a global presence. In comparison, Amazon GuardDuty's coverage is limited to the AWS environment, potentially impacting performance and security for users outside of the AWS network.

  5. Cost Structure: Amazon GuardDuty is a pay-as-you-go service based on the volume of events analyzed, making it suitable for organizations with fluctuating security needs. On the other hand, CloudFlare offers different pricing tiers based on features and usage, allowing businesses to choose a plan that aligns with their specific security requirements and budget constraints.

  6. Advanced Threat Intelligence: CloudFlare leverages its extensive network traffic data to provide advanced threat intelligence and real-time insights into emerging security threats. This proactive approach to threat detection enables CloudFlare to identify and mitigate sophisticated attacks effectively, making it a valuable asset for organizations looking to enhance their security posture. In comparison, Amazon GuardDuty's threat intelligence capabilities may be limited to the AWS environment, potentially missing out on external threats targeting the organization.

In Summary, Amazon GuardDuty is more tailored to security within the AWS environment, while CloudFlare offers a broader range of detection capabilities, scalability, integration options, global network coverage, cost structures, and advanced threat intelligence for a comprehensive security solution.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Amazon GuardDuty
Amazon GuardDuty

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

It is a managed threat detection service that continuously monitors for malicious or unauthorized behavior to help you protect your AWS accounts and workloads. It monitors for activity such as unusual API calls or potentially unauthorized deployments that indicate a possible account compromise. It also detects potentially compromised instances or reconnaissance by attackers.

CDN;WAF (Web Application Firewall);DDOS Protection;
Accurate, account-level threat detection; Continuous monitoring across AWS accounts without added cost and complexity; Threat detections developed and optimized for the cloud; Threat severity levels for efficient prioritization; Automate threat response and remediation; Highly available threat detection; One-click deployment with no additional software or infrastructure to deploy and manage
Statistics
Stacks
77.3K
Stacks
63
Followers
23.1K
Followers
59
Votes
1.8K
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 426
    Easy setup, great cdn
  • 278
    Free ssl
  • 200
    Easy setup
  • 191
    Security
  • 181
    Ssl
Cons
  • 2
    Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits
  • 2
    No support for SSHFP records
Pros
  • 2
    Easy setup
Integrations
CodeGuard
CodeGuard
Google Analytics
Google Analytics
GoSquared
GoSquared
Clicky
Clicky
UserVoice
UserVoice
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
Blitz
Blitz
Pingdom
Pingdom
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Splunk
Splunk

What are some alternatives to CloudFlare, Amazon GuardDuty?

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot