Amazon S3 vs Apache Kudu

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon S3
Amazon S3

13.9K
8.1K
+ 1
2K
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu

26
39
+ 1
3
Add tool

Amazon S3 vs Kudu: What are the differences?

Amazon S3: Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web. Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web; Kudu: Fast Analytics on Fast Data. A columnar storage manager developed for the Hadoop platform. A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

Amazon S3 and Kudu are primarily classified as "Cloud Storage" and "Big Data" tools respectively.

"Reliable" is the top reason why over 589 developers like Amazon S3, while over 2 developers mention "Realtime Analytics" as the leading cause for choosing Kudu.

Kudu is an open source tool with 788 GitHub stars and 263 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Kudu's open source repository on GitHub.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon S3?

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

What is Apache Kudu?

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon S3?
Why do developers choose Apache Kudu?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

Jobs that mention Amazon S3 and Apache Kudu as a desired skillset
What companies use Amazon S3?
What companies use Apache Kudu?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon S3?
What tools integrate with Apache Kudu?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3 and Apache Kudu?
Amazon Glacier
In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.
Amazon EBS
Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.
Amazon EC2
It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
Google Drive
The Drive SDK gives you a group of APIs along with client libraries, language-specific examples, and documentation to help you develop apps that integrate with Drive. The core functionality of Drive apps is to download and upload files in Google Drive. However, the Drive SDK provides a lot more than just storage.
Microsoft Azure
Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
See all alternatives
Decisions about Amazon S3 and Apache Kudu
No stack decisions found
Interest over time
Reviews of Amazon S3 and Apache Kudu
Review ofAmazon S3Amazon S3

Insanely low prices, quite easy to use, and they're fast. Plus they provide great support. And they're integrated with other AWS services, like CloudFront.

Seriously, this is the best service of it's kind out there.

How developers use Amazon S3 and Apache Kudu
Avatar of CloudRepo
CloudRepo uses Amazon S3Amazon S3

We store the software components that CloudRepo stores for its customers here for the following reasons:

  • Data is Encrypted at Rest
  • Data is stored across multiple physical locations
  • Pricing is competitive
  • Reliability is industry leading and our customers need to be able to access their data at all times list text here
Avatar of Yelp
Yelp uses Amazon S3Amazon S3

In October 2008 we moved to using scribe (now a custom branch), which has served us very well over the past 5+ years that we’ve been using it. We take the logs scribe aggregates and move them into Amazon S3 for storage, which makes using EMR on AWS seamless.

Avatar of cloak.ly
cloak.ly uses Amazon S3Amazon S3

S3 serves as zero-knowledge temporary storage. Files are encrypted in the browser before being uploaded in chunks to S3. When the target recipient downloads them the chunks are reassembled and decrypted in the browser. Files expire after a week and the encrypted chunks are permanently deleted from S3.

Avatar of CloudRepo
CloudRepo uses Amazon S3Amazon S3

Since we generate a static website for our website, AWS S3 provides hosting for us so that we don't have to run our own servers just to serve up static content.

The pricing is great as you only pay for what you use.

Avatar of Tana
Tana uses Amazon S3Amazon S3

This object storage is always evolving and getting harder to explain. We use it for 1) hosting every static websites, 2) datalake to store every transaction and 3) query with Athena / S3 Select.

How much does Amazon S3 cost?
How much does Apache Kudu cost?
Pricing unavailable
News about Apache Kudu
More news