Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Stacks58

Followers34

Votes1

Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Pricing Structure: Amazon S3 charges users based on the amount of data stored, data transfer, requests made, and additional features used, which can become complicated and expensive for users with varying storage needs. On the other hand, Backblaze B2 has a straightforward pricing model based purely on the amount of data stored and data transfer, making it more predictable and cost-effective for users.
API Integrations: Amazon S3 offers comprehensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with a wide range of applications and services, making it a popular choice for developers looking to build complex cloud storage solutions. Backblaze B2 also provides robust API capabilities but may have slightly fewer integrations compared to Amazon S3.
Data Durability and Availability: Amazon S3 guarantees 99.999999999% durability for objects stored in the system and offers multiple availability zones for high availability. Backblaze B2 offers similar durability guarantees but may have fewer availability zones, which could impact data access in the event of a regional outage.
Storage Limitations: Amazon S3 has no predefined limit on the amount of data a user can store, making it suitable for large-scale storage requirements. Backblaze B2, on the other hand, has a maximum file size limit of 5 TB for uploads, which may be a consideration for users dealing with extremely large files.
Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Amazon S3 provides SLAs guaranteeing service uptime and data durability, offering users assurance of reliability and availability. Backblaze B2 also offers SLAs but may have different terms and conditions compared to Amazon S3, so users should review them to ensure they meet their requirements.
Data Transfer Speeds: Amazon S3 may provide faster data transfer speeds for users with high-performance requirements, given its robust infrastructure and global network. Backblaze B2 offers competitive data transfer speeds but may vary based on the user's location and network conditions.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage differ in pricing structure, API integrations, data durability, storage limitations, SLAs, and data transfer speeds.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	It is a generic cloud storage. You can use it from any computer, any operating system or any cloud storage purpose. You can manage and store large amounts of media files using this service
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	-
Statistics
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 58
Followers 40.2K	Followers 34
Votes 2.0K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Requires a credit card 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 3 Complex to set up	Pros 1 Great API

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

Pricing Structure: Amazon S3 charges users based on the amount of data stored, data transfer, requests made, and additional features used, which can become complicated and expensive for users with varying storage needs. On the other hand, Backblaze B2 has a straightforward pricing model based purely on the amount of data stored and data transfer, making it more predictable and cost-effective for users.
API Integrations: Amazon S3 offers comprehensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with a wide range of applications and services, making it a popular choice for developers looking to build complex cloud storage solutions. Backblaze B2 also provides robust API capabilities but may have slightly fewer integrations compared to Amazon S3.
Data Durability and Availability: Amazon S3 guarantees 99.999999999% durability for objects stored in the system and offers multiple availability zones for high availability. Backblaze B2 offers similar durability guarantees but may have fewer availability zones, which could impact data access in the event of a regional outage.
Storage Limitations: Amazon S3 has no predefined limit on the amount of data a user can store, making it suitable for large-scale storage requirements. Backblaze B2, on the other hand, has a maximum file size limit of 5 TB for uploads, which may be a consideration for users dealing with extremely large files.
Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Amazon S3 provides SLAs guaranteeing service uptime and data durability, offering users assurance of reliability and availability. Backblaze B2 also offers SLAs but may have different terms and conditions compared to Amazon S3, so users should review them to ensure they meet their requirements.
Data Transfer Speeds: Amazon S3 may provide faster data transfer speeds for users with high-performance requirements, given its robust infrastructure and global network. Backblaze B2 offers competitive data transfer speeds but may vary based on the user's location and network conditions.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage differ in pricing structure, API integrations, data durability, storage limitations, SLAs, and data transfer speeds.

Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Overview