Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon S3

53.6K
40K
+ 1
2K
Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

52
33
+ 1
1
Add tool

Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: What are the differences?

  1. Pricing Structure: Amazon S3 charges users based on the amount of data stored, data transfer, requests made, and additional features used, which can become complicated and expensive for users with varying storage needs. On the other hand, Backblaze B2 has a straightforward pricing model based purely on the amount of data stored and data transfer, making it more predictable and cost-effective for users.
  2. API Integrations: Amazon S3 offers comprehensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with a wide range of applications and services, making it a popular choice for developers looking to build complex cloud storage solutions. Backblaze B2 also provides robust API capabilities but may have slightly fewer integrations compared to Amazon S3.
  3. Data Durability and Availability: Amazon S3 guarantees 99.999999999% durability for objects stored in the system and offers multiple availability zones for high availability. Backblaze B2 offers similar durability guarantees but may have fewer availability zones, which could impact data access in the event of a regional outage.
  4. Storage Limitations: Amazon S3 has no predefined limit on the amount of data a user can store, making it suitable for large-scale storage requirements. Backblaze B2, on the other hand, has a maximum file size limit of 5 TB for uploads, which may be a consideration for users dealing with extremely large files.
  5. Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Amazon S3 provides SLAs guaranteeing service uptime and data durability, offering users assurance of reliability and availability. Backblaze B2 also offers SLAs but may have different terms and conditions compared to Amazon S3, so users should review them to ensure they meet their requirements.
  6. Data Transfer Speeds: Amazon S3 may provide faster data transfer speeds for users with high-performance requirements, given its robust infrastructure and global network. Backblaze B2 offers competitive data transfer speeds but may vary based on the user's location and network conditions.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage differ in pricing structure, API integrations, data durability, storage limitations, SLAs, and data transfer speeds.

Decisions about Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

See more
Gabriel Pa

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon S3
Pros of Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
  • 30
    Logical
  • 13
    Easy Setup
  • 11
    REST API
  • 11
    1000+ POPs
  • 6
    Secure
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Plug and play
  • 3
    Web UI for uploading files
  • 2
    Faster on response
  • 2
    Flexible
  • 2
    GDPR ready
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Plug-gable
  • 1
    Easy integration with CloudFront
  • 1
    Great API

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon S3
Cons of Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 3
    Complex to set up
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    6.8K
    50.7K
    18K

    What is Amazon S3?

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

    What is Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage?

    It is a generic cloud storage. You can use it from any computer, any operating system or any cloud storage purpose. You can manage and store large amounts of media files using this service

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon S3?
    What companies use Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon S3?
    What tools integrate with Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage?
    Amazon Glacier
    In order to keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for data that is infrequently accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are suitable. With Amazon Glacier, customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.01 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions.
    Amazon EBS
    Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Google Drive
    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.
    Microsoft Azure
    Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.
    See all alternatives