Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon S3 vs Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage: What are the differences?
- Pricing Structure: Amazon S3 charges users based on the amount of data stored, data transfer, requests made, and additional features used, which can become complicated and expensive for users with varying storage needs. On the other hand, Backblaze B2 has a straightforward pricing model based purely on the amount of data stored and data transfer, making it more predictable and cost-effective for users.
- API Integrations: Amazon S3 offers comprehensive API support, allowing for seamless integration with a wide range of applications and services, making it a popular choice for developers looking to build complex cloud storage solutions. Backblaze B2 also provides robust API capabilities but may have slightly fewer integrations compared to Amazon S3.
- Data Durability and Availability: Amazon S3 guarantees 99.999999999% durability for objects stored in the system and offers multiple availability zones for high availability. Backblaze B2 offers similar durability guarantees but may have fewer availability zones, which could impact data access in the event of a regional outage.
- Storage Limitations: Amazon S3 has no predefined limit on the amount of data a user can store, making it suitable for large-scale storage requirements. Backblaze B2, on the other hand, has a maximum file size limit of 5 TB for uploads, which may be a consideration for users dealing with extremely large files.
- Service Level Agreements (SLAs): Amazon S3 provides SLAs guaranteeing service uptime and data durability, offering users assurance of reliability and availability. Backblaze B2 also offers SLAs but may have different terms and conditions compared to Amazon S3, so users should review them to ensure they meet their requirements.
- Data Transfer Speeds: Amazon S3 may provide faster data transfer speeds for users with high-performance requirements, given its robust infrastructure and global network. Backblaze B2 offers competitive data transfer speeds but may vary based on the user's location and network conditions.
In Summary, Amazon S3 and Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage differ in pricing structure, API integrations, data durability, storage limitations, SLAs, and data transfer speeds.
We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.
We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.
Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.
We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.
That's why we switched to S3 that just works.
Pros of Amazon S3
- Reliable590
- Scalable492
- Cheap456
- Simple & easy329
- Many sdks83
- Logical30
- Easy Setup13
- REST API11
- 1000+ POPs11
- Secure6
- Easy4
- Plug and play4
- Web UI for uploading files3
- Faster on response2
- Flexible2
- GDPR ready2
- Easy to use1
- Plug-gable1
- Easy integration with CloudFront1
Pros of Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage
- Great API1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon S3
- Permissions take some time to get right7
- Requires a credit card6
- Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly6
- Complex to set up3