RabbitMQ vs. Amazon SQS vs. IronMQ

Get help choosing one of these Get news updates about these tools


RabbitMQ

Amazon SQS

IronMQ

Favorites

114

Favorites

21

Favorites

3

Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • 402
  • 320
  • 8.52K
  • -
  • 6
  • 1.57K
  • 477
  • 257
  • 48

GitHub Stats

No public GitHub repository stats available
No public GitHub repository stats available

Description

What is RabbitMQ?

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is IronMQ?

An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.

Pros about this tool

Pros
Why do you like RabbitMQ?

Pros
Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Pros
Why do you like IronMQ?

Cons about this tool

Cons
Cons
No Cons submitted yet for Amazon SQS
Cons
No Cons submitted yet for IronMQ

Pricing

Amazon SQS Pricing IronMQ Pricing

Companies

755 Companies Using RabbitMQ
320 Companies Using Amazon SQS
11 Companies Using IronMQ

Integrations

RabbitMQ Integrations
Amazon SQS Integrations
IronMQ Integrations

What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ, Amazon SQS, and IronMQ?

  • Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
  • Celery - Distributed task queue
  • ActiveMQ - A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client
  • ZeroMQ - Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort

See all alternatives to RabbitMQ



Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these