Ansible vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

Ansible and Rundeck are both popular IT automation tools that help to streamline and simplify various operational tasks. Below are the key differences between them:

Architecture: Ansible is a configuration management tool that follows a push-based model. It uses SSH and runs tasks on target hosts directly. On the other hand, Rundeck is a job scheduling tool that adopts a more robust client-server architecture. It leverages the Rundeck server to execute jobs on remote nodes via various plugins or protocols. This fundamental difference in architecture has implications on the scale and complexity of the automation tasks each tool can handle.
Flexibility and Extensibility: Ansible offers a rich set of modules and plugins that allow users to automate a wide range of tasks. It supports a large number of platforms and can be easily extended with custom modules. In contrast, Rundeck is primarily focused on job scheduling and orchestration. While Rundeck provides various plugins to integrate with other tools, it may not have the same level of flexibility and extensibility as Ansible for complex automation scenarios.
Workflow and Orchestration: Ansible provides a powerful and flexible workflow engine that allows users to define complex automation workflows using YAML. It enables tasks to be executed in a specific sequence, with conditions, loops, and error handling. On the other hand, Rundeck offers advanced job scheduling and orchestration capabilities. It allows users to create workflows by defining dependencies between jobs, parallel execution, and controlling the flow of execution based on various conditions.
Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Ansible follows a simple and easy-to-understand YAML-based syntax for creating playbooks and tasks. This makes it relatively easy for beginners to get started with Ansible. Rundeck, on the other hand, has a more complex and feature-rich user interface that may require some learning curve for new users.
Community and Ecosystem: Ansible has a large and thriving community with active contributors and a vast ecosystem of pre-built playbooks, modules, and roles. This makes it easier for users to find solutions, share knowledge, and contribute to the community. Rundeck also has an active community, but it may not have the same level of community support and ecosystem as Ansible.
Scalability and Performance: Ansible is designed to handle large-scale automation tasks efficiently. It supports parallel execution and can manage a large number of nodes simultaneously. Rundeck, being primarily a job scheduler, may have limitations in terms of scalability and performance when it comes to handling a large number of targets or complex workflows.

In summary, Ansible is a versatile open-source automation tool for configuration management and application deployment, emphasizing simplicity and ease of use. Rundeck, on the other hand, is a job scheduling and runbook automation platform designed for managing and orchestrating complex workflows, providing a centralized control point for operations tasks.

Ansible	Rundeck
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.	A self-service operations platform used for support tasks, enterprise job scheduling, deployment, and more.
Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 66.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 24.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19.5K	Stacks 204
Followers 15.6K	Followers 343
Votes 1.3K	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
Pros 284 Agentless 210 Great configuration 199 Simple 176 Powerful 155 Easy to learn Cons 8 Dangerous 5 Hard to install 3 Bloated 3 Doesn't Run on Windows 3 Backward compatibility	Pros 3 Role based access control 3 Easy to understand 1 Doesn't need containers
Integrations
Nexmo Stackdriver VMware vSphere Docker OpenStack Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Google Compute Engine New Relic PagerDuty	Jenkins

Ansible vs Rundeck

Overview

Ansible vs Rundeck: What are the differences?

🔥 Trending in Continuous Deployment on StackShare

Advice on Ansible, Rundeck

Detailed Comparison

What are some alternatives to Ansible, Rundeck?

Chef

Terraform

Capistrano

Puppet Labs

Salt

Fabric

AWS OpsWorks

cPanel

Webmin

Mina

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana