StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. Apache Camel vs Azure App Service vs Google Anthos

Apache Camel vs Azure App Service vs Google Anthos

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Stacks8.2K
Followers323
Votes22
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks5.1K
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Stacks312
Followers380
Votes11
Google Anthos
Google Anthos
Stacks54
Followers266
Votes8

Apache Camel vs Azure App Service vs Google Anthos: What are the differences?

Apache Camel, Azure App Service, and Google Anthos are all popular tools used for developing and deploying applications. Below are the key differences between Apache Camel, Azure App Service, and Google Anthos.

  1. Deployment: Apache Camel is primarily used for routing and mediation rules within Java applications, whereas Azure App Service provides a fully managed platform for building, deploying, and scaling web apps and APIs. On the other hand, Google Anthos allows for containerized application deployment across on-premises, multi-cloud, and hybrid cloud environments.

  2. Scalability: Apache Camel can be scaled vertically by adding more resources to the server where it is running, while Azure App Service enables automatic scaling based on the traffic to the application. Google Anthos offers flexible scaling options allowing for vertical and horizontal scaling of containerized applications across different environments.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Apache Camel is known for its extensive library of connectors and components for seamless integration with various systems, protocols, and data formats. Azure App Service offers built-in support for integrating with Azure services and third-party services. Google Anthos supports integration with Kubernetes-based applications and services, making it suitable for modern containerized environments.

  4. Pricing Model: Apache Camel is an open-source framework, so there are no licensing costs associated with using it. Azure App Service follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the resources and features used. Google Anthos has a subscription-based pricing model with additional costs for managing and scaling containerized workloads.

  5. Monitoring and Management: Apache Camel provides basic monitoring features through JMX and custom development, while Azure App Service offers built-in monitoring tools and integration with Azure Monitor for comprehensive application insights. Google Anthos provides centralized monitoring, logging, and management of containerized workloads through integration with Google Cloud's operations suite.

  6. Security Features: Apache Camel relies on Java security features and standard practices for securing applications. Azure App Service includes built-in security features such as DDoS protection and SSL/TLS encryption for safeguarding applications. Google Anthos offers advanced security capabilities through Google Cloud's Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, encryption, and network security controls.

In Summary, Apache Camel, Azure App Service, and Google Anthos differ in terms of deployment options, scalability, integration capabilities, pricing models, monitoring and management tools, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Azure App Service
Azure App Service
Google Anthos
Google Anthos

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

Quickly build, deploy, and scale web apps created with popular frameworks .NET, .NET Core, Node.js, Java, PHP, Ruby, or Python, in containers or running on any operating system. Meet rigorous, enterprise-grade performance, security, and compliance requirements by using the fully managed platform for your operational and monitoring tasks.

Formerly Cloud Services Platform, Anthos lets you build and manage modern hybrid applications across environments. Powered by Kubernetes and other industry-leading open-source technologies from Google.

--
Google Kubernetes Engine Support; GKE On-Prem Support; Istio on GKE Support; Anthos Config Management; Stackdriver Support; Kubernetes applications on GCP Marketplace; Serverless; API management; Continuous integration; Continuous delivery
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.2K
Stacks
312
Stacks
54
Followers
323
Followers
380
Followers
266
Votes
22
Votes
11
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Based on Enterprise Integration Patterns
  • 4
    Free (open source)
  • 4
    Has over 250 components
  • 4
    Highly configurable
  • 3
    Open Source
Pros
  • 6
    .Net Framework
  • 5
    Visual studio
Pros
  • 3
    Operations support by Google SRE
  • 2
    Host Cloud Run (managed knative) anywhere
  • 1
    Access to Google Kubernetes Marketplace
  • 1
    Policy enforcement via ACM
  • 1
    Automatic k8s upgrades
Cons
  • 3
    Expensive
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Python
Python
.NET
.NET
Ruby
Ruby
PHP
PHP
Node.js
Node.js
.NET Core
.NET Core
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
MongoDB
MongoDB
GitLab
GitLab
Istio
Istio
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Couchbase
Couchbase
Splunk
Splunk
Neo4j
Neo4j

What are some alternatives to Apache Camel, Azure App Service, Google Anthos?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase