StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Hive vs Snowflake

Apache Hive vs Snowflake

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Stacks488
Followers475
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks4.8K
Snowflake
Snowflake
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.2K
Votes27

Apache Hive vs Snowflake: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Hive and Snowflake are both popular tools used for data warehousing and analytics. While they both serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between these two platforms.

  1. Data Warehousing Approach: Apache Hive is based on the Hadoop ecosystem and follows a traditional on-premises approach to data warehousing. It allows users to query and analyze large datasets stored in distributed file systems like HDFS. On the other hand, Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing platform that offers scalable and elastic storage and compute resources. It provides a service-based approach to data warehousing, allowing users to focus on analysis rather than infrastructure management.

  2. Query Language: Apache Hive uses HiveQL, which is a SQL-like declarative language. It allows users to write SQL queries to analyze data stored in Hive. In contrast, Snowflake supports multiple query languages including standard SQL, which makes it easier for users familiar with SQL to get started. Snowflake also introduces some unique syntax and features, such as variant data type and semi-structured data support, which enable powerful querying capabilities.

  3. Performance Optimization: Apache Hive relies on MapReduce for query processing, which can be slower when dealing with large datasets. Hive provides techniques like data partitioning and bucketing to improve query performance. Snowflake, on the other hand, utilizes a unique architecture that separates storage and compute layers. This allows for independent scalability and parallelism, resulting in faster query processing, especially for complex queries and large datasets.

  4. Concurrency and Multi-Tenancy: Apache Hive supports multiple users and concurrent queries, but it may face contention issues when the number of concurrent users or queries increases. It requires external tools like YARN for resource management and scheduling. Snowflake, on the other hand, is built with multi-tenancy in mind. It automatically manages resource allocation and provides isolation between different accounts, ensuring consistent performance and preventing one user's workload from impacting others.

  5. Data Sharing and Collaboration: Apache Hive provides features like Metastore and HCatalog that allow sharing and collaboration between different data processing frameworks, such as Pig and Spark. It also supports integration with other tools in the Hadoop ecosystem. Snowflake offers secure data sharing capabilities that allow organizations to share data with external parties without having to physically copy or move the data. It provides granular control over data access and allows users to share subsets of data or entire databases.

  6. Deployment and Infrastructure Management: Apache Hive requires manual setup and configuration of the Hadoop ecosystem, including HDFS, YARN, and Hive itself. It requires expertise in managing and operating distributed systems. Snowflake, being a cloud-based service, eliminates the need for infrastructure management. It handles tasks like data replication, backup, and disaster recovery automatically, providing a hassle-free experience for users.

In summary, Apache Hive is a traditional on-premises data warehousing solution based on the Hadoop ecosystem, while Snowflake is a cloud-based data warehousing platform with a service-based approach. Snowflake offers better performance, scalability, and ease of use compared to Apache Hive, but Hive provides compatibility with other Hadoop tools and frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Hive, Snowflake

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Snowflake
Snowflake

Hive facilitates reading, writing, and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage using SQL. Structure can be projected onto data already in storage.

Snowflake eliminates the administration and management demands of traditional data warehouses and big data platforms. Snowflake is a true data warehouse as a service running on Amazon Web Services (AWS)—no infrastructure to manage and no knobs to turn.

Built on top of Apache Hadoop; Tools to enable easy access to data via SQL; Support for extract/transform/load (ETL), reporting, and data analysis; Access to files stored either directly in Apache HDFS and HBase; Query execution using Apache Hadoop MapReduce, Tez or Spark frameworks
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
488
Stacks
1.2K
Followers
475
Followers
1.2K
Votes
0
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Public and Private Data Sharing
  • 4
    User Friendly
  • 4
    Multicloud
  • 4
    Good Performance
  • 3
    Great Documentation
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
HBase
HBase
Python
Python
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Node.js
Node.js
Looker
Looker
Periscope
Periscope
Mode
Mode

What are some alternatives to Apache Hive, Snowflake?

Google BigQuery

Google BigQuery

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

lakeFS

lakeFS

It is an open-source data version control system for data lakes. It provides a “Git for data” platform enabling you to implement best practices from software engineering on your data lake, including branching and merging, CI/CD, and production-like dev/test environments.

Druid

Druid

Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase