Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Kudu

72
258
+ 1
10
Kafka

23.7K
22.1K
+ 1
607
Add tool

Apache Kudu vs Kafka: What are the differences?

  1. Data Structure: Apache Kudu stores data in tables with rows and columns, making it suitable for OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) workloads. In contrast, Apache Kafka stores data in topics of key-value pairs, focusing on message streaming and real-time data processing for OLTP (Online Transaction Processing) scenarios.

  2. Use Case: Apache Kudu is typically used for fast analytics on rapidly changing data (such as time series data) where random access to data is essential. On the other hand, Apache Kafka is commonly used for building real-time data pipelines and stream processing applications, enabling the processing of constantly flowing data streams at scale.

  3. Persistence: Apache Kudu has built-in storage capabilities and maintains data persistence in its tables like a traditional database. While Apache Kafka does not persist data by default, it primarily acts as a message broker where data is temporarily stored before being consumed by data consumers.

  4. Processing Model: Apache Kudu follows a random access model suitable for analytical queries that require interactive responses. In contrast, Apache Kafka operates on a publish-subscribe model where data producers publish messages to topics, and consumers subscribe to these topics to process the messages sequentially or in parallel.

  5. Scalability: Apache Kudu provides built-in horizontal scalability by distributing data across multiple nodes and processing queries in parallel to achieve high performance. Apache Kafka is inherently scalable and fault-tolerant, allowing horizontal scaling of both producers and consumers to handle increasing data volumes and concurrent processing requirements efficiently.

  6. Consistency: Apache Kudu guarantees strong consistency for data read and write operations within a partition, ensuring data accuracy and integrity. Apache Kafka provides configurable levels of data consistency, allowing trade-offs between data durability, availability, and performance based on the use case requirements.

In Summary, Apache Kudu and Apache Kafka serve distinct purposes in data processing, with Apache Kudu focusing on columnar storage for analytics and Apache Kafka emphasizing distributed streaming for real-time data processing.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Apache Kudu
Pros of Kafka
  • 10
    Realtime Analytics
  • 126
    High-throughput
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 92
    Scalable
  • 86
    High-Performance
  • 66
    Durable
  • 38
    Publish-Subscribe
  • 19
    Simple-to-use
  • 18
    Open source
  • 12
    Written in Scala and java. Runs on JVM
  • 9
    Message broker + Streaming system
  • 4
    KSQL
  • 4
    Avro schema integration
  • 4
    Robust
  • 3
    Suport Multiple clients
  • 2
    Extremely good parallelism constructs
  • 2
    Partioned, replayable log
  • 1
    Simple publisher / multi-subscriber model
  • 1
    Fun
  • 1
    Flexible

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Apache Kudu
Cons of Kafka
  • 1
    Restart time
  • 32
    Non-Java clients are second-class citizens
  • 29
    Needs Zookeeper
  • 9
    Operational difficulties
  • 5
    Terrible Packaging

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

45
133
35
33

What is Apache Kudu?

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

What is Kafka?

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Apache Kudu?
What companies use Kafka?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache Kudu?
What tools integrate with Kafka?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Dec 22 2021 at 5:41AM

Pinterest

MySQLKafkaDruid+3
3
626
Amazon S3KafkaZookeeper+5
8
1661
Mar 24 2021 at 12:57PM

Pinterest

GitJenkinsKafka+7
3
2234
What are some alternatives to Apache Kudu and Kafka?
Cassandra
Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
HBase
Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.
Apache Spark
Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
Apache Impala
Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.
Hadoop
The Apache Hadoop software library is a framework that allows for the distributed processing of large data sets across clusters of computers using simple programming models. It is designed to scale up from single servers to thousands of machines, each offering local computation and storage.
See all alternatives