Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Service Bus vs CloudAMQP: What are the differences?
Azure Service Bus and CloudAMQP are both messaging services that provide reliable message delivery between applications. However, there are several key differences between the two platforms.
Pricing Model: Azure Service Bus has a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers are charged based on the number of operations performed and the amount of data transferred. On the other hand, CloudAMQP uses a subscription-based pricing model, where customers pay a fixed monthly fee based on the selected plan and the desired features.
Hosting Infrastructure: Azure Service Bus is a fully managed service provided by Microsoft, with the infrastructure hosted on the Azure cloud platform. CloudAMQP, on the other hand, is a hosted RabbitMQ service, where the infrastructure is hosted and managed by CloudAMQP.
Protocol Support: Azure Service Bus supports multiple protocols including AMQP, HTTPS, and Net Messaging. CloudAMQP, being a RabbitMQ-based service, primarily supports the AMQP protocol.
Message Persistence: Azure Service Bus offers reliable message persistence by storing messages in the cloud, ensuring that they are not lost even in the event of failures. CloudAMQP also provides message persistence, but it relies on the underlying RabbitMQ infrastructure for storage.
Integration: Azure Service Bus is tightly integrated with other Azure services, making it easy to integrate with other cloud-based services and applications. CloudAMQP can also be integrated with various cloud platforms and services, but it may require additional configuration and setup.
Scalability: Azure Service Bus provides automatic scaling capabilities, allowing applications to scale up or down based on demand. CloudAMQP also supports scaling, but it may require manual configuration and monitoring to handle increased workload.
In Summary, Azure Service Bus and CloudAMQP differ in terms of pricing model, hosting infrastructure, protocol support, message persistence, integration capabilities, and scalability options.
Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?
We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).
Thank you very much in advance :)
There are many different messaging frameworks available for IPC use. It's not really a question of how "new" the technology is, but what you need it to do. Azure Service Bus can be a great service to use, but it can also take a lot of effort to administrate and maintain that can make it costly to use unless you need the more advanced features it offers for routing, sequencing, delivery, etc. I would recommend checking out this link to get a basic idea of different messaging architectures. These only cover Azure services, but there are many other solutions that use similar architectural models.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/event-grid/compare-messaging-services
In addition to being a lot cheaper, Google Cloud Pub/Sub allowed us to not worry about maintaining any more infrastructure that needed.
We moved from a self-hosted RabbitMQ over to CloudAMQP and decided that since we use GCP anyway, why not try their managed PubSub?
It is one of the better decisions that we made, and we can just focus about building more important stuff!
Pros of Azure Service Bus
- Easy Integration with .Net4
- Cloud Native2
- Use while high messaging need1
Pros of CloudAMQP
- Some of the best customer support you'll ever find4
- Easy to provision3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Service Bus
- Limited features in Basic tier1
- Skills can only be used in Azure - vendor lock-in1
- Lacking in JMS support1
- Observability of messages in the queue is lacking1
Cons of CloudAMQP
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Azure Service Bus?
What is CloudAMQP?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Azure Service Bus?
What companies use CloudAMQP?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Azure Service Bus?
What tools integrate with CloudAMQP?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+24