Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
IronMQ vs Mosca: What are the differences?
Developers describe IronMQ as "Message Queue for any deployment". An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance. On the other hand, Mosca is detailed as "A Node.js MQTT broker". A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.
IronMQ and Mosca can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.
Some of the features offered by IronMQ are:
- Instant High Availability- Runs on top cloud infrastructures and uses multiple high-availability data centers. Uses reliable datastores for message durability and persistence.
- Easy to Use- IronMQ is super easy to use. Simply connect directly to the API endpoints and you're ready to create and use queues. There are also client libraries available in any language you want – Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, .NET, Go, Node.JS, and more
- Scalable / High Performance- Built using high-performance languages designed for concurrency and runs on industrial-strength clouds. Push messages and stream data at will without worrying about memory limits or adding more servers.
On the other hand, Mosca provides the following key features:
- MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 compliant
- QoS 0 and QoS 1
- Various storage options for QoS 1 offline packets, and subscriptions
Mosca is an open source tool with 2.84K GitHub stars and 501 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Mosca's open source repository on GitHub.
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MorePros of IronMQ
Pros of Mosca
Pros of IronMQ
- Great Support12
- Heroku Add-on8
- Push support3
- Delayed delivery upto 7 days3
- Super fast2
- Language agnostic2
- Good analytics/monitoring2
- Ease of configuration2
- GDPR Compliant2
Pros of Mosca
Be the first to leave a pro
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of IronMQ
Cons of Mosca
Cons of IronMQ
- Can't use rabbitmqadmin1
Cons of Mosca
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is IronMQ?
An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.
What is Mosca?
A Node.js MQTT broker, which can be used as a Standalone Service or embedded in another Node.js application.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention IronMQ and Mosca as a desired skillset
What companies use IronMQ?
What companies use Mosca?
What companies use Mosca?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with IronMQ?
What tools integrate with Mosca?
What tools integrate with IronMQ?
What tools integrate with Mosca?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to IronMQ and Mosca?
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
CloudAMQP
Fully managed, highly available RabbitMQ servers and clusters, on all major compute platforms.
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system
that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including
transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types
and functions.