Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
IronMQ vs pg-amqp-bridge: What are the differences?
What is IronMQ? Message Queue for any deployment. An easy-to-use highly available message queuing service. Built for distributed cloud applications with critical messaging needs. Provides on-demand message queuing with advanced features and cloud-optimized performance.
What is pg-amqp-bridge? Send Messages from PostgreSQL to RabbitMQ. This tool enables a decoupled architecture, think sending emails when a user signs up. Instead of having explicit code in your signup function that does the work (and slows down your response), you just have to worry about inserting the row into the database.
IronMQ and pg-amqp-bridge can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.
pg-amqp-bridge is an open source tool with 251 GitHub stars and 14 GitHub forks. Here's a link to pg-amqp-bridge's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of IronMQ
- Great Support12
- Heroku Add-on8
- Push support3
- Delayed delivery upto 7 days3
- Super fast2
- Language agnostic2
- Good analytics/monitoring2
- Ease of configuration2
- GDPR Compliant2
Pros of pg-amqp-bridge
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of IronMQ
- Can't use rabbitmqadmin1