Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache NiFi vs Logstash: What are the differences?
Introduction
Apache NiFi and Logstash are two popular data processing tools used for ingesting, transforming, and routing data in real-time. Although they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two.
Data Processing Approach: Apache NiFi and Logstash employ different approaches to data processing. Apache NiFi utilizes a flow-based programming model, where data is routed through interconnected processors and processors perform specific actions on the data. Logstash, on the other hand, follows a pipeline-based approach, where data flows through a series of stages and each stage applies a specific filter or action on the data.
Flexibility and Extensibility: Apache NiFi provides a more flexible and extensible framework for data processing. It offers a wide range of processors with various functionalities and allows users to create custom processors to meet specific requirements. Logstash, although extensible, has a more limited set of built-in plugins and its extensibility mainly relies on community-contributed plugins.
Ease of Use: Apache NiFi focuses on simplicity and ease of use with its user-friendly graphical interface. It provides a drag-and-drop visual interface for designing and monitoring data flows, making it easy for users to create and maintain data pipelines. Logstash, while also supporting a graphical interface called Kibana, primarily relies on configuration files, which may require more technical expertise to set up and manage.
Integration with Ecosystem: Apache NiFi is tightly integrated with the Apache Hadoop ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with Big Data technologies and tools such as Hadoop, Hive, HBase, and more. It can leverage the full power of the Hadoop ecosystem for data processing and storage. Logstash, on the other hand, is part of the Elasticsearch ecosystem and is commonly used for log analysis and ingesting data into Elasticsearch for indexing and search.
Scalability: Apache NiFi provides built-in scalability features, such as the ability to deploy multiple instances in a cluster and distribute data processing across the cluster. It can handle high volumes of data and scale horizontally to meet increased demand. Logstash can also be scaled using multiple instances, but it requires external tools like Elasticsearch and RabbitMQ to achieve distributed processing and scalability.
Community and Support: Apache NiFi has a vibrant and active community with regular updates, documentation, and support available from the Apache Software Foundation. It also has a large user base, contributing to its ecosystem of processors and extensions. Logstash, being an open-source project by Elastic (previously Elasticsearch), also benefits from a strong community and support, with regular updates and a vast range of community-contributed plugins available.
In summary, Apache NiFi and Logstash differ in their data processing approach, flexibility, ease of use, integration with ecosystems, scalability, and community support. Understanding these differences can help you choose the right tool for your specific data processing needs.
Pros of Apache NiFi
- Visual Data Flows using Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)17
- Free (Open Source)8
- Simple-to-use7
- Scalable horizontally as well as vertically5
- Reactive with back-pressure5
- Fast prototyping4
- Bi-directional channels3
- End-to-end security between all nodes3
- Built-in graphical user interface2
- Can handle messages up to gigabytes in size2
- Data provenance2
- Lots of documentation1
- Hbase support1
- Support for custom Processor in Java1
- Hive support1
- Kudu support1
- Slack integration1
- Lot of articles1
Pros of Logstash
- Free69
- Easy but powerful filtering18
- Scalable12
- Kibana provides machine learning based analytics to log2
- Great to meet GDPR goals1
- Well Documented1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache NiFi
- HA support is not full fledge2
- Memory-intensive2
- Kkk1
Cons of Logstash
- Memory-intensive4
- Documentation difficult to use1