Apigee vs Postman vs Sandbox

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apigee

237
687
+ 1
30
Postman

93.9K
80.5K
+ 1
1.8K
Sandbox

27
55
+ 1
0

Apigee vs Postman vs Sandbox: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: Apigee is designed for large-scale API management, making it ideal for enterprises with high volumes of API calls. In contrast, Postman and Sandbox are more suitable for smaller projects or individual developers due to their limited scalability and performance capabilities.

  2. Collaboration Features: Apigee offers advanced collaboration features such as API documentation, version control, and integrations with CI/CD tools, facilitating team collaboration on API development. Postman also provides collaboration tools but lacks the extensive features of Apigee, while Sandbox is primarily a testing environment with limited collaboration capabilities.

  3. Security: Apigee provides robust security features such as access control, threat protection, and encryption to protect APIs from potential attacks and breaches. Postman and Sandbox, on the other hand, have minimal security features, making them less suitable for handling sensitive data or production-level APIs.

  4. Monitoring and Analytics: Apigee offers comprehensive monitoring and analytics capabilities, allowing users to track API performance, identify bottlenecks, and optimize resources effectively. In comparison, Postman and Sandbox lack the advanced monitoring and analytics features provided by Apigee, limiting users' ability to analyze and improve their APIs.

  5. Customization and Extensibility: Apigee allows for extensive customization and extensibility through its API proxies, policies, and extensions, enabling developers to tailor API management to their specific requirements. Postman and Sandbox have limited customization options, restricting users' ability to adapt the platforms to unique use cases or integrate with external systems easily.

  6. Deployment Options: Apigee offers various deployment options, including cloud, hybrid, and on-premises, providing flexibility for organizations with different infrastructure requirements. In contrast, Postman and Sandbox are primarily cloud-based solutions with limited support for on-premises or hybrid deployments, limiting their suitability for organizations with specific hosting preferences.

In Summary, Apigee excels in scalability, collaboration, security, monitoring, customization, and deployment flexibility compared to Postman and Sandbox.

Advice on Apigee, Postman, and Sandbox
Needs advice
on
PostmanPostmanApiaryApiary
and
Swagger UISwagger UI

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

See more
Replies (3)
Jagdeep Singh
Tech Lead at ucreate.it · | 8 upvotes · 389.2K views

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

See more

I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.

See more
Sadik Ay
Recommends
on
PostmanPostman

I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.

See more
Decisions about Apigee, Postman, and Sandbox
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 1 upvote · 343.4K views

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Apigee
Pros of Postman
Pros of Sandbox
  • 12
    Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform
  • 6
    Good documentation
  • 6
    Quick jumpstart
  • 3
    Fast and adjustable caching
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Apigee
    Cons of Postman
    Cons of Sandbox
    • 11
      Expensive
    • 1
      Doesn't support hybrid natively
    • 10
      Stores credentials in HTTP
    • 9
      Bloated features and UI
    • 8
      Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
    • 7
      Poor GraphQL support
    • 5
      Expensive
    • 3
      Not free after 5 users
    • 3
      Can't prompt for per-request variables
    • 1
      Import swagger
    • 1
      Support websocket
    • 1
      Import curl
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -
      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Apigee?

      API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

      What is Postman?

      It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

      What is Sandbox?

      Quickly mock RESTful API or SOAP web-services with simple or dynamic responses, and fault injection to simulate real application behaviour.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Apigee?
      What companies use Postman?
      What companies use Sandbox?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Apigee?
      What tools integrate with Postman?
      What tools integrate with Sandbox?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Apigee, Postman, and Sandbox?
      Mashery
      Sign In and discover new APIs from our open data commons of RESTful APIs. Mashery's API management offerings include strategic consulting & developer support to help you build your business.
      Zuul
      It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.
      Kong
      Kong is a scalable, open source API Layer (also known as an API Gateway, or API Middleware). Kong controls layer 4 and 7 traffic and is extended through Plugins, which provide extra functionality and services beyond the core platform.
      WSO2
      It delivers the only complete open source middleware platform. With its revolutionary componentized design, it is also the only open source platform-as-a-service for private and public clouds available today. With it, seamless migration and integration between servers, private clouds, and public clouds is now a reality.
      Istio
      Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.
      See all alternatives