StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. In Browser Testing
  5. Applitools vs Ghost Inspector vs Simply Testable

Applitools vs Ghost Inspector vs Simply Testable

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Stacks64
Followers117
Votes22
Simply Testable
Simply Testable
Stacks0
Followers27
Votes0
Applitools
Applitools
Stacks62
Followers163
Votes15

Applitools vs Ghost Inspector vs Simply Testable: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integrations: Applitools offers seamless integrations with popular testing frameworks and tools like Selenium, Appium, etc., enabling easy incorporation within existing workflows. Ghost Inspector, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and provides user-friendly integrations with popular platforms like Slack, Jira, etc. Simply Testable, while versatile, may require more manual setup and custom integration work compared to Applitools and Ghost Inspector.

  2. Testing Capabilities: Applitools stands out with its impressive AI-powered visual testing capabilities, allowing teams to perform automated visual regression testing efficiently. Ghost Inspector focuses on end-to-end testing and monitoring, including automated browser testing. Simply Testable offers a comprehensive suite of testing tools, including HTML validation, CSS validation, and more, but may lack advanced features present in Applitools and Ghost Inspector.

  3. Reporting and Analysis: Applitools offers detailed visual test reports, including pixel-by-pixel comparisons and smart grouping of similar visual bugs for easy analysis. Ghost Inspector provides custom reporting features like screenshots, videos, logs, and performance metrics to aid in diagnosing issues effectively. Simply Testable may have basic reporting capabilities that require additional tools or customization for in-depth analysis and reporting.

  4. Scalability: Applitools is built to handle large-scale visual testing tasks with cloud-based infrastructure and parallel testing capabilities, ideal for enterprise-level projects. Ghost Inspector caters to both small and large teams, offering scalability through cloud-based execution environments and support for parallel testing. Simply Testable, while scalable, may have limitations in handling extensive testing demands compared to Applitools and Ghost Inspector.

  5. Community Support and Resources: Applitools has a strong community presence, providing forums, webinars, and extensive documentation to assist users in leveraging the platform effectively. Ghost Inspector offers responsive customer support and a knowledge base to address user queries promptly. Simply Testable may have a smaller community and resource pool, which could affect the availability of support and learning materials for users.

  6. Cost Structure: Applitools has a tiered pricing model based on factors like users, tests, and concurrency, providing flexibility for teams of varying sizes. Ghost Inspector offers a transparent pricing structure based on the number of test suites and test executions, making it simple to budget for testing needs. Simply Testable's pricing may vary based on usage and additional services required, potentially leading to higher costs for certain features compared to Applitools and Ghost Inspector.

In Summary, Applitools excels in AI-powered visual testing with seamless integrations, while Ghost Inspector focuses on end-to-end testing and user-friendly integrations, whereas Simply Testable provides a versatile suite of tools with potential limitations in advanced features, scalability, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
Simply Testable
Simply Testable
Applitools
Applitools

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

One-click full-site HTML validation, CSS validation, JavaScript static analysis and broken link checking.

Applitools delivers the next generation of test automation powered by AI assisted computer vision technology known as Visual AI. Visual AI helps Developers, Test Automation Engineers and QA professionals release high-quality web and mobile

Automated browser testing from the cloud;Chrome extension for test recording;GUI editor for test building and editing;Screenshot comparison for catching display issues;API for integration into your CI setup;Selenium test export option
HTML validation; CSS validation; JavaScript static analysis; broken link checking
Integration with functional testing tools;Automated visual comparisons of application pages;Validation interface;Share bug reports with team & ticketing systems;SDKs for common languages
Statistics
Stacks
64
Stacks
0
Stacks
62
Followers
117
Followers
27
Followers
163
Votes
22
Votes
0
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    No code required
  • 3
    Simple test editor
  • 3
    Runscope integration
  • 2
    Videos of every test run
  • 2
    Screenshot comparison
Cons
  • 1
    Support Cross-device testing (device, web)
  • 0
    Load & Performance testing
  • 0
    Flash Support inside browser
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Visual AI is 99.9999% accurate
  • 2
    Fast cross-browser test execution
  • 2
    AI & ML eliminate false positives (vs. pixel-based))
  • 2
    Test against multiple browsers, viewports, and devices
  • 2
    Augments any testing framework - easy to implement
Cons
  • 2
    Lot of bugs
  • 2
    Problems with integration
  • 2
    Ambiguous
  • 2
    Colours with small contrast diff are not identified
  • 2
    Mismatched image test results
Integrations
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Runscope
Runscope
GitHub
GitHub
Heroku
Heroku
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
HipChat
HipChat
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub
CircleCI
CircleCI
Slack
Slack
Jenkins
Jenkins
OpenCV
OpenCV
Cypress
Cypress
Travis CI
Travis CI
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Jira
Jira
React Storybook
React Storybook

What are some alternatives to Ghost Inspector, Simply Testable, Applitools?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Cypress

Cypress

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana