Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Aurora vs Git: What are the differences?
# Introduction
1. **Scalability**: Apache Aurora is designed for managing long-running services and cron jobs while Git is a distributed version control system primarily used for software development, focusing on tracking changes in source code files. The scalability requirements and usage scenarios for these tools are different, making Apache Aurora more suitable for large-scale service orchestration compared to Git's focus on code versioning.
2. **Resource Management**: Apache Aurora provides a higher level of resource management capabilities by allowing users to define resource requirements for tasks, prioritize them, and efficiently manage the allocation of resources. In contrast, Git does not provide resource management features as its primary function is to track changes in code repositories rather than manage resource utilization for tasks.
3. **Fault Tolerance**: Apache Aurora offers built-in fault tolerance features such as job retries, task rescheduling, and automatic healing to ensure high availability and reliability of managed services. Git, on the other hand, does not provide fault tolerance mechanisms natively, as its core purpose is to track changes and facilitate collaboration among developers rather than handle fault recovery for running services.
4. **Dynamic Configuration**: Apache Aurora allows users to dynamically configure and update the settings of running tasks without interrupting service availability, enabling easy scale-out and configuration changes. Git focuses on static configuration management by tracking changes in configuration files within code repositories, which are typically applied at deployment time rather than dynamically adjusted during runtime.
5. **Task Scheduling**: Apache Aurora offers robust task scheduling capabilities, including cron-like scheduling for recurring tasks, fine-grained control over task execution, and dependency management between tasks. Git does not have built-in task scheduling features as it is primarily focused on versioning code files and does not handle the scheduling and execution of tasks or services.
6. **API Integrations**: Apache Aurora provides a RESTful API for interacting with the system programmatically, allowing automation and integration with external tools and services. Git offers APIs for interacting with repositories and performing version control operations but does not provide the same level of API support for managing tasks, scheduling jobs, and resource allocation like Apache Aurora.
# Summary
In Summary, Apache Aurora and Git differ in their focus on scalability, resource management, fault tolerance, dynamic configuration, task scheduling, and API integrations, catering to distinct use cases in service orchestration and code versioning, respectively.
SVN is much simpler than git for the simple stuff (checking in files and updating them when everyone's online), and much more complex than git for the complicated stuff (branching and merging). Or put another way, git's learning curve is steep up front, and then increases moderately as you do weird things; SVN's learning curve is very shallow up front and then increases rapidly.
If you're storing large files, if you're not branching, if you're not storing source code, and if your team is happy with SVN and the workflow you have, I'd say you should stay on SVN.
If you're writing source code with a relatively modern development practice (developers doing local builds and tests, pre-commit code reviews, preferably automated testing, preferably some amount of open-source code), you should move to git for two reasons: first, this style of working inherently requires frequent branching and merging, and second, your ability to interact with outside projects is easier if you're all comfortable with git instead of snapshotting the outside project into SVN.
Pros of Apache Aurora
Pros of Git
- Distributed version control system1.4K
- Efficient branching and merging1.1K
- Fast959
- Open source845
- Better than svn726
- Great command-line application368
- Simple306
- Free291
- Easy to use232
- Does not require server222
- Distributed28
- Small & Fast23
- Feature based workflow18
- Staging Area15
- Most wide-spread VSC13
- Disposable Experimentation11
- Role-based codelines11
- Frictionless Context Switching7
- Data Assurance6
- Efficient5
- Just awesome4
- Easy branching and merging3
- Github integration3
- Compatible2
- Possible to lose history and commits2
- Flexible2
- Team Integration1
- Easy1
- Light1
- Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system1
- Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing1
- Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast1
- CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome1
- It's what you do1
- Phinx0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Aurora
Cons of Git
- Hard to learn16
- Inconsistent command line interface11
- Easy to lose uncommitted work9
- Worst documentation ever possibly made8
- Awful merge handling5
- Unexistent preventive security flows3
- Rebase hell3
- Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly2
- When --force is disabled, cannot rebase2
- Doesn't scale for big data1