Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Auth0 vs OAuth2: What are the differences?
Auth0 and OAuth2 are authentication and authorization solutions commonly used in modern applications. Let's explore the key differences between Auth0 and OAuth2 in more detail:
Functionality: Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management platform that provides authentication, authorization, and user management services. It offers features such as user authentication with various identity providers, social login integration, multi-factor authentication, and user profile management. Auth0 also includes user consent management, single sign-on (SSO), and customizable authentication flows. On the other hand, OAuth2 is an open standard for authorization that defines a framework for secure delegated access to resources. It focuses primarily on granting access tokens and managing permissions.
Implementation: Auth0 provides a complete identity platform as a service, allowing developers to integrate authentication and authorization functionality using Auth0's APIs and SDKs. It provides a unified interface for managing user identities. OAuth2, on the other hand, is a protocol specification that needs to be implemented by developers in their applications. It provides a set of defined roles, grant types, and endpoints for authentication and authorization. Developers need to implement these specifications to enable OAuth2-based authentication and authorization.
Scalability and Maintenance: Auth0 is a hosted service, meaning that the infrastructure and maintenance are managed by Auth0 itself. This provides scalability and reliability without requiring developers to manage the underlying infrastructure. In contrast, OAuth2 is an open standard that can be implemented on any server or platform. The scalability and maintenance depend on the implementation choices made by developers. They are responsible for managing the infrastructure, updates, and security of the OAuth2 implementation.
Integration and Ecosystem: Auth0 offers a rich ecosystem and integrations with various identity providers, including social media platforms, enterprise directories, and popular identity protocols like SAML and OpenID Connect. OAuth2, on the other hand, is a protocol that allows developers to integrate with multiple identity providers, including popular ones like Google, Facebook, and GitHub. It provides a standardized approach for obtaining access tokens from these providers and managing permissions.
Customization and Extensibility: Auth0 provides extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the authentication and authorization flows. It supports custom branding, user interface customization, and a flexible rules engine for implementing custom logic during authentication and authorization. OAuth2, being a protocol, provides a certain level of flexibility, but the customization options are limited to the specific implementation choices made by developers.
In summary, Auth0 is a comprehensive identity management platform that offers authentication, authorization, and user management services as a hosted service. It provides a unified interface for managing user identities and includes features like social login integration and customizable authentication flows. OAuth2, on the other hand, is an authorization protocol that defines a framework for secure delegated access to resources. It focuses primarily on granting access tokens and managing permissions.
Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?
As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?
I would recommend Auth0 only if you are willing to shell out money. You can keep up with their free version only for a very limited time and as per our experience as a growing startup where budget is an issue, their support was not very helpful as they first asked us to sign a commercial agreement even before helping us t o find out whether Auth0 fits our use case or not! But otherwise Auth0 is a great platform to speed up authentication. In our case we had to move to alternatives like Casbin for multi-tenant authorization!
I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.
When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.
The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.
Pros of Auth0
- JSON web token70
- Integration with 20+ Social Providers31
- It's a universal solution20
- SDKs20
- Amazing Documentation15
- Heroku Add-on11
- Enterprise support8
- Great Sample Repos7
- Extend platform with "rules"7
- Azure Add-on4
- Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider3
- Passwordless3
- It can integrate seamlessly with firebase2
- Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support2
- Polished2
- On-premise deployment2
- Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance1
- MFA1
- Active Directory support1
- Springboot1
- SOC21
- SAML Support1
- Great support1
- OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support1
Pros of OAuth2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Auth0
- Pricing too high (Developer Pro)15
- Poor support7
- Rapidly changing API4
- Status page not reflect actual status4