StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Autocode IDE vs Postman

Autocode IDE vs Postman

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Postman
Postman
Stacks96.1K
Followers82.5K
Votes1.8K
Forks0
Autocode IDE
Autocode IDE
Stacks5
Followers20
Votes0

Autocode IDE vs Postman: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Autocode IDE and Postman are popular tools used in software development. While both tools offer similar functionality, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand what sets them apart.

  1. User Interface: Autocode IDE provides a more intuitive and user-friendly interface compared to Postman. The Autocode IDE has a clean and modern design, making it easy for users to navigate and access different features. On the other hand, Postman has a slightly more complex and cluttered UI, which may require more time for new users to get familiar with.

  2. Code Generation: Autocode IDE focuses on code generation and automation, allowing developers to quickly generate code snippets and templates for various programming languages and frameworks. This feature is especially useful for accelerating development speed and reducing human error. In contrast, Postman primarily focuses on API testing and documentation, with limited code generation capabilities.

  3. Collaboration and Sharing: Autocode IDE offers robust collaboration and-sharing features, enabling teams to work together seamlessly on projects. It allows developers to share their code snippets and templates with others, enabling collaboration and knowledge-sharing. Postman, on the other hand, offers collaboration features but is more centered around individual workflow rather than large-scale team collaboration.

  4. Integration Capabilities: Autocode IDE provides extensive integration capabilities with various APIs, databases, and services. It offers a wide range of pre-built connectors and allows developers to easily integrate their projects with third-party systems. Postman, while it does support integrations, does not offer the same level of extensive integration capabilities as Autocode IDE.

  5. Automation and Scheduled Tasks: Autocode IDE includes built-in automation and scheduling features, allowing developers to automate repetitive tasks and schedule code execution at specified intervals. This feature is particularly valuable for tasks such as data synchronization, data fetching, and periodic code execution. Postman lacks these automation and scheduling capabilities, primarily focusing on API testing and documentation.

  6. Deployment Options: Autocode IDE provides seamless deployment options for deploying applications to various cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It offers an easy-to-use deployment workflow, making it effortless to deploy and manage applications. Postman, being more focused on API testing, does not provide the same level of deployment options as Autocode IDE.

In Summary, Autocode IDE offers a more user-friendly interface, extensive code generation capabilities, robust collaboration features, extensive integration capabilities, built-in automation and scheduling tools, and seamless deployment options. On the other hand, Postman is more focused on API testing and documentation, with a slightly more complex UI, limited code generation capabilities, and less extensive integration and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Postman, Autocode IDE

Jagdeep
Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

ReviewonPostmanPostman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k
Comments
Stephen
Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman
Postman
Autocode IDE
Autocode IDE

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

It is an integrated development environment (IDE) for connecting APIs and creating app-to-app workflows. It provides API autocomplete, code generation, easy multi-app auth, in-browser code execution, dev environments, logging, revision history + mor

Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud
Autocomplete for APIs; Authentication Made Easy; Test Code in the Browser; Complete Revision History; Build Your Own APIs
Statistics
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
96.1K
Stacks
5
Followers
82.5K
Followers
20
Votes
1.8K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
Cons
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
No community feedback yet
Integrations
HipChat
HipChat
Keen
Keen
Slack
Slack
Dropbox
Dropbox
Datadog
Datadog
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Bigpanda
Bigpanda
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Newman
Newman
VictorOps
VictorOps
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Postman, Autocode IDE?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope