Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Autocode IDE vs Postman: What are the differences?
Introduction:
Autocode IDE and Postman are popular tools used in software development. While both tools offer similar functionality, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand what sets them apart.
User Interface: Autocode IDE provides a more intuitive and user-friendly interface compared to Postman. The Autocode IDE has a clean and modern design, making it easy for users to navigate and access different features. On the other hand, Postman has a slightly more complex and cluttered UI, which may require more time for new users to get familiar with.
Code Generation: Autocode IDE focuses on code generation and automation, allowing developers to quickly generate code snippets and templates for various programming languages and frameworks. This feature is especially useful for accelerating development speed and reducing human error. In contrast, Postman primarily focuses on API testing and documentation, with limited code generation capabilities.
Collaboration and Sharing: Autocode IDE offers robust collaboration and-sharing features, enabling teams to work together seamlessly on projects. It allows developers to share their code snippets and templates with others, enabling collaboration and knowledge-sharing. Postman, on the other hand, offers collaboration features but is more centered around individual workflow rather than large-scale team collaboration.
Integration Capabilities: Autocode IDE provides extensive integration capabilities with various APIs, databases, and services. It offers a wide range of pre-built connectors and allows developers to easily integrate their projects with third-party systems. Postman, while it does support integrations, does not offer the same level of extensive integration capabilities as Autocode IDE.
Automation and Scheduled Tasks: Autocode IDE includes built-in automation and scheduling features, allowing developers to automate repetitive tasks and schedule code execution at specified intervals. This feature is particularly valuable for tasks such as data synchronization, data fetching, and periodic code execution. Postman lacks these automation and scheduling capabilities, primarily focusing on API testing and documentation.
Deployment Options: Autocode IDE provides seamless deployment options for deploying applications to various cloud platforms, such as AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. It offers an easy-to-use deployment workflow, making it effortless to deploy and manage applications. Postman, being more focused on API testing, does not provide the same level of deployment options as Autocode IDE.
In Summary, Autocode IDE offers a more user-friendly interface, extensive code generation capabilities, robust collaboration features, extensive integration capabilities, built-in automation and scheduling tools, and seamless deployment options. On the other hand, Postman is more focused on API testing and documentation, with a slightly more complex UI, limited code generation capabilities, and less extensive integration and deployment options.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Autocode IDE
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Autocode IDE
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1