StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Amplify vs Heroku

AWS Amplify vs Heroku

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Heroku
Heroku
Stacks25.8K
Followers20.5K
Votes3.2K
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify
Stacks615
Followers552
Votes15

AWS Amplify vs Heroku: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS Amplify and Heroku

1. Scalability and Flexibility: AWS Amplify offers high scalability and flexibility by allowing users to easily scale up or down their applications based on demand. It provides auto-scaling features and the ability to handle larger workloads. On the other hand, Heroku offers limited scalability and has server limitations, which can restrict the growth potential of applications.

2. Service Integrations: AWS Amplify provides seamless integration with other AWS services, such as Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, allowing users to easily build complex applications with extensive backend services. Heroku, on the other hand, has a limited set of integrations that primarily focus on application deployment and management.

3. Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of AWS Amplify is based on a pay-as-you-go model, where users only pay for the resources they consume. This makes it more cost-effective for small to medium-sized applications. Heroku, on the other hand, has a fixed pricing structure that can be more expensive for applications that require high scalability and resources.

4. Deployment Process: AWS Amplify offers a seamless deployment process by automatically building and deploying applications based on code changes committed to a Git repository. It also supports continuous integration and delivery workflows. Heroku also provides an easy deployment process, but it requires manual deployment through Git or other deployment methods.

5. Platform Support: AWS Amplify supports a wide range of platforms and frameworks, including web, mobile, and serverless applications. It provides SDKs for various programming languages and offers compatibility with popular frameworks like React and Angular. Heroku primarily focuses on web applications and supports a limited set of languages and platforms.

6. Infrastructure Management: AWS Amplify provides a fully managed infrastructure, where users don't need to worry about server provisioning, scaling, and maintenance. It takes care of the underlying infrastructure and allows developers to focus on building applications. Heroku also offers a managed platform, but it provides less control and customization options compared to AWS Amplify.

In summary, AWS Amplify and Heroku differ in terms of scalability and flexibility, service integrations, pricing structure, deployment process, platform support, and infrastructure management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Heroku
Heroku
AWS Amplify
AWS Amplify

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.

Agile deployment for Ruby, Node.js, Clojure, Java, Python, Go and Scala.;Run and scale any type of app.;Total visibility across your entire app.;Erosion-resistant architecture. Rich control surfaces.
-
Statistics
Stacks
25.8K
Stacks
615
Followers
20.5K
Followers
552
Votes
3.2K
Votes
15
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 703
    Easy deployment
  • 459
    Free for side projects
  • 374
    Huge time-saver
  • 348
    Simple scaling
  • 261
    Low devops skills required
Cons
  • 27
    Super expensive
  • 9
    Not a whole lot of flexibility
  • 7
    No usable MySQL option
  • 7
    Storage
  • 5
    Low performance on free tier
Pros
  • 5
    GraphQL
  • 3
    Better with Relations and Security
  • 2
    Flexible Auth options
  • 2
    Cheaper
  • 1
    Config free environment variables
Cons
  • 2
    Free tier is limited
  • 1
    Steep Learning Curve
Integrations
Mailgun
Mailgun
Postmark
Postmark
Loggly
Loggly
Papertrail
Papertrail
Redis Cloud
Redis Cloud
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Red Hat Codeready Workspaces
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Logentries
Logentries
MongoLab
MongoLab
Gemfury
Gemfury
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native
React
React
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito

What are some alternatives to Heroku, AWS Amplify?

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot