StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. AWS CodeBuild vs Buildkite

AWS CodeBuild vs Buildkite

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Buildkite
Buildkite
Stacks210
Followers231
Votes115
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild
Stacks443
Followers485
Votes43

AWS CodeBuild vs Buildkite: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodeBuild and Buildkite are two popular continuous integration and continuous deployment tools used for automating build and deployment processes in software development projects. They both offer various features and capabilities that developers can leverage to streamline their development workflow.

  1. Hosting: AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services, which means users don't have to worry about server provisioning, maintenance, and scaling. On the other hand, Buildkite is a self-hosted solution, giving users more control over their build infrastructure but requiring them to manage the servers themselves.

  2. Scalability: AWS CodeBuild scales automatically based on the number of build jobs in the queue, allowing users to run multiple concurrent builds without worrying about infrastructure limitations. Buildkite's scalability is dependent on the infrastructure and resources allocated by the user, which may require manual intervention to scale efficiently.

  3. Pricing: AWS CodeBuild pricing is based on the number of build minutes consumed, the compute resources used, and any additional services utilized within the build process. Buildkite, on the other hand, offers a flat monthly fee based on the number of concurrent build agents, providing predictable pricing for users with consistent build needs.

  4. Integration: AWS CodeBuild integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeCommit, and AWS CodeDeploy, making it a preferred choice for teams already using the AWS ecosystem. Buildkite offers integrations with various third-party tools and services, giving users the flexibility to customize their build pipelines with the tools they prefer.

  5. Customization: AWS CodeBuild provides predefined build environments and build specifications for users to configure their build processes easily. Buildkite allows users to define custom build pipelines using the Buildkite pipeline.yml file, enabling greater flexibility and control over the build and deployment process.

  6. Community and Support: AWS CodeBuild benefits from the extensive support and documentation provided by Amazon Web Services, including a large community of users and resources. Buildkite offers personalized support and community forums, focusing on providing quality assistance to users with their specific needs and challenges.

In Summary, AWS CodeBuild and Buildkite differ in terms of hosting, scalability, pricing, integration, customization, and community support, providing users with a choice between a managed service with seamless AWS integration or a self-hosted solution with greater control and flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Buildkite
Buildkite
AWS CodeBuild
AWS CodeBuild

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

AWS CodeBuild is a fully managed build service that compiles source code, runs tests, and produces software packages that are ready to deploy. With CodeBuild, you don’t need to provision, manage, and scale your own build servers.

Fast and stable builds; Open source agent runs on almost any machine and architecture; Freedom to use your own internal or pre-release tools and services; Powerful distributed build tools; Key/value targeting of agents; Dynamic job allocation allows adding and removing build machines; Shared key/value and binary artifact stores for easily distributing build jobs regardless of machine or network; Integration with pull requests, deployments and releases; GitHub, Github Enterprise, Bitbucket, Gitlab or your own SCM; Slack, Hipchat, Webhooks, and LIFX notifications; Extensible per-project with agent hooks, webhooks and the rest API; GitHub Enterprise is supported standard; SSO
Fully Managed Build Service;Continuous Scaling;Enables Continuous Integration;Integrates seamlessly with AWS services;FAQs: https://aws.amazon.com/codebuild/faqs/
Statistics
Stacks
210
Stacks
443
Followers
231
Followers
485
Votes
115
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 18
    Great customer support
  • 17
    Github integration
  • 16
    Easy to use
  • 16
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Simplicity
Pros
  • 7
    Pay per minute
  • 5
    Parameter Store integration for passing secrets
  • 4
    Integrated with AWS
  • 3
    Bit bucket integration
  • 3
    Streaming logs to Amazon CloudWatch
Cons
  • 2
    Poor branch support
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
GitLab
GitLab
Heroku
Heroku
HipChat
HipChat
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Git
Git
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
TestFlight
TestFlight
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
AWS CloudFormation
AWS CloudFormation
Jenkins
Jenkins
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise

What are some alternatives to Buildkite, AWS CodeBuild?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana