StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Continuous Deployment
  5. AWS CodePipeline vs DeployHQ

AWS CodePipeline vs DeployHQ

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DeployHQ
DeployHQ
Stacks24
Followers39
Votes0
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Stacks551
Followers933
Votes30

AWS CodePipeline vs DeployHQ: What are the differences?

Introduction

AWS CodePipeline and DeployHQ are both popular platforms for managing the deployment of code and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) processes. While they share similar goals, there are some key differences between the two services.

  1. Integration with Other AWS Services: One key difference between AWS CodePipeline and DeployHQ is their level of integration with other AWS services. AWS CodePipeline is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other services such as AWS CodeCommit, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeDeploy. This makes it an ideal choice for organizations that rely heavily on AWS services for their infrastructure.

  2. Deployment Flexibility: DeployHQ offers more deployment flexibility compared to AWS CodePipeline. DeployHQ can deploy code to a wide range of targets, including FTP/SFTP servers, cloud-based storage providers (such as Amazon S3 and Google Cloud Storage), and even manual deployments via email or Slack. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, primarily focuses on deploying code to AWS services, making it more limited in terms of deployment options.

  3. Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of AWS CodePipeline and DeployHQ also differs. AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-per-use model, where you are billed based on the number of pipelines created and the amount of time your pipelines are active. DeployHQ offers tiered pricing based on the number of projects and the number of deployments you need, providing more flexibility for organizations with varying deployment needs.

  4. Ease of Use: DeployHQ is generally considered to be easier to set up and use compared to AWS CodePipeline. DeployHQ provides a straightforward user interface and a simple configuration process, making it accessible to users with varying levels of technical expertise. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, may require a higher level of technical knowledge due to its integration with other AWS services and its more complex configuration options.

  5. Support and Documentation: AWS CodePipeline benefits from the extensive support and documentation provided by AWS. As a well-established cloud service provider, AWS offers comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums to assist users in maximizing the capabilities of AWS CodePipeline. DeployHQ, while offering support and documentation, may not have the same level of resources and community support as AWS.

In summary, while both AWS CodePipeline and DeployHQ offer solutions for managing code deployment and CI/CD processes, AWS CodePipeline has a stronger integration with the AWS ecosystem and provides more deployment options for AWS services. DeployHQ, on the other hand, offers more deployment flexibility and a simpler setup process. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs of your organization and the level of integration required with other AWS services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DeployHQ
DeployHQ
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline

A service packed with features to help you automate and manage the continuous deployment of your websites.

CodePipeline builds, tests, and deploys your code every time there is a code change, based on the release process models you define.

Zero Downtime Deployments; Build Pipelines; Deployment Targets; Automatic Deployment; Deployment Templates Deploy Behind Firewalls; Powerful Integrations; Mobile App
Workflow Modeling;AWS Integrations;Pre-Built Plugins;Custom Plugins;Declarative Templates;Access Control
Statistics
Stacks
24
Stacks
551
Followers
39
Followers
933
Votes
0
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    Simple to set up
  • 8
    Managed service
  • 4
    GitHub integration
  • 3
    Parallel Execution
  • 2
    Automatic deployment
Cons
  • 2
    No project boards
  • 1
    No integration with "Power" 365 tools
Integrations
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
New Relic
New Relic
Sentry
Sentry
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Discord
Discord
Honeybadger
Honeybadger
CloudFlare
CloudFlare
Rollbar
Rollbar
Runscope
Runscope
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
GitHub
GitHub
Jenkins
Jenkins
CloudBees
CloudBees
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2

What are some alternatives to DeployHQ, AWS CodePipeline?

Buddy

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

DeployBot

DeployBot

DeployBot makes it simple to deploy your work anywhere. You can compile or process your code in a Docker container on our infrastructure, and we'll copy it to your servers once everything has been successfully built.

Deployer

Deployer

A deployment tool written in PHP with support for popular frameworks out of the box

Spinnaker

Spinnaker

Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.

Harness.io

Harness.io

It automates the entire CI/CD process, uses machine learning to protect you when deployments fail, equips you with enterprise-grade security, & simplifies cloud cost visibility, savings, & forecasting without any tagging requirements.

Google Cloud Build

Google Cloud Build

Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.

Kraken Deploy

Kraken Deploy

Modern deployment platform with event-driven architecture, real-time monitoring, and enterprise security. The cloud-native alternative to Octopus Deploy.

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

Gaia

Gaia

Gaia is an open source automation platform which makes it easy and fun to build powerful pipelines in any programming language. Based on HashiCorp's go-plugin and gRPC, gaia is efficient, fast, lightweight, and developer friendly.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana