StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Cloud Foundry

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Cloud Foundry

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Stacks2.1K
Followers1.8K
Votes241
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry
Stacks188
Followers346
Votes5

AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs Cloud Foundry: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry. Both these platforms are widely used for deploying and managing applications in the cloud. Understanding their differences will help in making an informed decision while choosing the right platform for your needs.

  1. Ease of Use: AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides a more user-friendly interface and simpler deployment process compared to Cloud Foundry. Elastic Beanstalk automates many infrastructure management tasks, allowing developers to focus on their applications. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry requires more manual configuration and setup, making it more suitable for advanced users.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Elastic Beanstalk is specific to the AWS ecosystem and tightly integrated with other AWS services. It provides seamless integration with various AWS services such as Amazon RDS, Amazon S3, and Amazon EC2. In contrast, Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform that can run on a variety of infrastructure providers, including AWS, VMware, Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure. It offers more flexibility in terms of platform compatibility.

  3. Control and Customization: Elastic Beanstalk provides a managed environment where AWS handles most of the infrastructure management tasks. This limits the control and customization options available to the user. On the other hand, Cloud Foundry gives users more control over their deployment environment. It allows fine-grained configuration and customization options, enabling users to tailor the platform according to their specific requirements.

  4. Pricing Model: Elastic Beanstalk follows the pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the underlying AWS resources used by their application. This provides cost-efficiency and scalability, especially for smaller applications. Cloud Foundry, being an open-source platform, offers more flexibility in terms of pricing. Users can choose their own infrastructure provider and pricing model, depending on their preferences and budget.

  5. Community and Support: Elastic Beanstalk has strong community support and extensive documentation provided by AWS. It benefits from being a part of the larger AWS ecosystem, which provides a vast array of resources and support options. Cloud Foundry, being an open-source platform, also has a vibrant community and a wide range of support options. However, the level of support and available resources may vary depending on the infrastructure provider chosen by the user.

  6. Scalability and Availability: Elastic Beanstalk easily scales up or down based on the workload demands. It automatically handles infrastructure scaling and load balancing, ensuring high availability. Cloud Foundry also provides mechanisms for scaling and load balancing, but the configuration and management need to be done manually. Elastic Beanstalk offers a more seamless and automated approach to scalability and availability.

In summary, AWS Elastic Beanstalk and Cloud Foundry differ in terms of ease of use, platform compatibility, control and customization options, pricing model, community and support, and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Cloud Foundry

Mehdi
Mehdi

Managing Director at Gigadrive

Sep 17, 2022

Decided

Platform.sh has great out-of-the-box support for PHP apps (especially Symfony, as it was made by the same people). Elastic Beanstalk does not have a lot of compelling PaaS features like Platform.sh. There, you have to install a lot of PHP extensions manually for example, while Platform.sh just handles it for you based on your config. Elastic Beanstalk also has terrible version updates (see link).

13.6k views13.6k
Comments
Alejandro
Alejandro

May 13, 2022

Review

I recently came across a training course on using Django and React together. That got me thinking about how to serve up the project and remember that Heroku had a great interface for serving up my Django/Python App so I would think it should work. Figured I would throw in my 2 cents, not sure if it helps.

1.26k views1.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Cloud Foundry
Cloud Foundry

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Cloud Foundry is an open platform as a service (PaaS) that provides a choice of clouds, developer frameworks, and application services. Cloud Foundry makes it faster and easier to build, test, deploy, and scale applications.

Elastic Beanstalk is built using familiar software stacks such as the Apache HTTP Server for Node.js, PHP and Python, Passenger for Ruby, IIS 7.5 for .NET, and Apache Tomcat for Java;There is no additional charge for Elastic Beanstalk - you pay only for the AWS resources needed to store and run your applications.;Easy to begin – Elastic Beanstalk is a quick and simple way to deploy your application to AWS. You simply use the AWS Management Console, Git deployment, or an integrated development environment (IDE) such as Eclipse or Visual Studio to upload your application;Impossible to outgrow – Elastic Beanstalk automatically scales your application up and down based on default Auto Scaling settings;Complete control – Elastic Beanstalk lets you "open the hood" and retain full control over the AWS resources powering your application;Flexible – You have the freedom to select the Amazon EC2 instance type that is optimal for your application based on CPU and memory requirements, and can choose from several available database options;Reliable – Elastic Beanstalk runs within Amazon's proven network infrastructure and datacenters, and provides an environment where developers can run applications requiring high durability and availability.
Application and services centric lifecycle API;High performance dynamic routing;Buildpack support;Data and web services brokers;Linux Container management;Role Based Access and Teams;Active application health management;Standards based user authentication and authorization;Integrated real time logging API;Multi-provider ecosystem
Statistics
Stacks
2.1K
Stacks
188
Followers
1.8K
Followers
346
Votes
241
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 77
    Integrates with other aws services
  • 65
    Simple deployment
  • 44
    Fast
  • 28
    Painless
  • 16
    Free
Cons
  • 2
    Charges appear automatically after exceeding free quota
  • 1
    Lots of moving parts and config
  • 0
    Slow deployments
Pros
  • 2
    Perfectly aligned with springboot
  • 1
    Free distributed tracing (zipkin)
  • 1
    Application health management
  • 1
    Free service discovery (Eureka)
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Papertrail
Papertrail
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Logentries
Logentries
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
OpenStack
OpenStack
Papertrail
Papertrail
Amazon VPC
Amazon VPC
Splunk Cloud
Splunk Cloud
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic

What are some alternatives to AWS Elastic Beanstalk, Cloud Foundry?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Render

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase