AWS Key Management Service vs Postman

Overview

Postman

Stacks96.1K

Followers82.5K

Votes1.8K

Forks0

AWS Key Management Service

Stacks231

Followers172

Votes14

AWS Key Management Service vs Postman: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between AWS Key Management Service (KMS) and Postman.

Purpose and Functionality: AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that allows you to create and control encryption keys that are used to encrypt your data, while Postman is a collaboration platform for API development that allows users to design, test, and document APIs.
Cost Structure: AWS KMS charges are based on the number of requests made to the service and the amount of key material stored, while Postman offers different pricing tiers based on the number of team members and advanced features needed.
Intended Users: AWS KMS is targeted towards organizations and developers who need to manage and secure their encryption keys for various AWS services, whereas Postman is more suited for API developers, testers, and technical writers collaborating on API projects.
Integration Capabilities: AWS KMS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services and offers SDKs and APIs for easy integration into your applications, while Postman allows integration with various third-party tools and has a vast library of integrations for different use cases.
Security Features: AWS KMS provides advanced security features such as hardware security modules (HSMs) to protect sensitive key material, key rotation, and auditing capabilities, whereas Postman focuses on providing secure collaboration features for API development teams.
Compliance and Certifications: AWS KMS is compliant with several industry standards and certifications such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOC, making it suitable for organizations with strict compliance requirements, whereas Postman focuses on providing a user-friendly platform for API development and testing without specific compliance certifications.

In Summary, AWS KMS and Postman differ in terms of their functionality, cost structures, target users, integration capabilities, security features, and compliance certifications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Postman, AWS Key Management Service

Jagdeep

Tech Lead at Founder and Lightning

May 6, 2019

Reviewon

Postman

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

411k views411k

Comments

StackShare

May 1, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

382k views382k

Comments

Stephen

Artificial Intelligence Fellow

Feb 4, 2020

Decided

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

361k views361k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Postman	AWS Key Management Service
It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.	AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs.
Compact layout;HTTP requests with file upload support;Formatted API responses for JSON and XML;Image previews;Request history;Basic Auth, OAuth 1.0, OAuth 2.0, and other common auth helpers;Autocomplete for URL and header values;Key/value editors for adding parameters or header values. Works for URL parameters too.;Use environment variables to easily shift between settings. Great for testing production, staging or local setups.;Keyboard shortcuts to maximize your productivity;Automatically generated web documentation;Mock servers hosted on Postman’s cloud;API monitoring run from Postman cloud	Centralized Key Management;Integrated with AWS services;Encryption for all your applications;Built-in Auditing;Fully Managed;Low-cost; Secure
Statistics
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 96.1K	Stacks 231
Followers 82.5K	Followers 172
Votes 1.8K	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 490 Easy to use 369 Great tool 276 Makes developing rest api's easy peasy 156 Easy setup, looks good 144 The best api workflow out there Cons 10 Stores credentials in HTTP 9 Bloated features and UI 8 Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens 7 Poor GraphQL support 5 Expensive	Pros 6 Integrated with AWS CloudTrail 4 KMS 4 Backed by Amazon 0 Free
Integrations
HipChat Keen Slack Dropbox Datadog PagerDuty Bigpanda Microsoft Teams Newman VictorOps	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Postman, AWS Key Management Service?

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Docusaurus

Docusaurus is a project for easily building, deploying, and maintaining open source project websites.

Related Comparisons

Postman vs Swagger UI

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope

AWS Key Management Service vs Postman: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between AWS Key Management Service (KMS) and Postman.

Purpose and Functionality: AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that allows you to create and control encryption keys that are used to encrypt your data, while Postman is a collaboration platform for API development that allows users to design, test, and document APIs.
Cost Structure: AWS KMS charges are based on the number of requests made to the service and the amount of key material stored, while Postman offers different pricing tiers based on the number of team members and advanced features needed.
Intended Users: AWS KMS is targeted towards organizations and developers who need to manage and secure their encryption keys for various AWS services, whereas Postman is more suited for API developers, testers, and technical writers collaborating on API projects.
Integration Capabilities: AWS KMS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services and offers SDKs and APIs for easy integration into your applications, while Postman allows integration with various third-party tools and has a vast library of integrations for different use cases.
Security Features: AWS KMS provides advanced security features such as hardware security modules (HSMs) to protect sensitive key material, key rotation, and auditing capabilities, whereas Postman focuses on providing secure collaboration features for API development teams.
Compliance and Certifications: AWS KMS is compliant with several industry standards and certifications such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOC, making it suitable for organizations with strict compliance requirements, whereas Postman focuses on providing a user-friendly platform for API development and testing without specific compliance certifications.

In Summary, AWS KMS and Postman differ in terms of their functionality, cost structures, target users, integration capabilities, security features, and compliance certifications.