AWX vs Semaphore

Overview

Semaphore

Stacks190

Followers187

Votes83

AWX

Stacks138

Followers259

Votes1

GitHub Stars15.0K

Forks3.6K

AWX vs Semaphore: What are the differences?

AWX and Semaphore are both popular tools used for continuous integration and deployment. Here are the key differences between them.

Deployment model: AWX is an open-source tool that allows users to operate it on their own infrastructure. This gives users complete control over their environment and data. On the other hand, Semaphore is a cloud-based CI/CD platform that handles all the infrastructure and management tasks, providing a hassle-free experience for users.
Pricing and scalability: AWX being an open-source tool is free to use, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations on a tight budget. In contrast, Semaphore offers different pricing plans based on the user's requirements, providing scalability options for businesses of all sizes.
Integration capabilities: AWX supports a wide range of integrations, including version control systems like Git and Subversion, as well as various notification systems. Semaphore also offers integration with popular tools like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing seamless collaboration and automation within the development workflow.
Ease of use: AWX, being a self-hosted tool, requires the user to set up and maintain the infrastructure themselves. This may involve additional technical knowledge and effort. Semaphore, being a cloud-based platform, offers a user-friendly interface and takes care of the infrastructure, making it easier for users to get started with CI/CD.
Extensibility and customization: AWX being open-source, provides users the ability to customize and extend its capabilities according to their specific requirements. Semaphore, while not open-source, provides a range of customizations and configuration options, ensuring flexibility in the CI/CD pipeline.
Community support: AWX benefits from a strong and active open-source community, which means a large pool of resources and community-driven support. Semaphore, being a cloud-based platform, offers professional support and a dedicated customer success team to assist users in case of any issues or queries.

In summary, AWX is an open-source self-hosted tool with extensive customization options and community support, while Semaphore is a cloud-based platform offering scalability, ease of use, and professional support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Semaphore	AWX
Semaphore is the fastest continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform on the market, powering the world’s best engineering teams.	AWX provides a web-based user interface, REST API, and task engine built on top of Ansible. It is the upstream project for Tower, a commercial derivative of AWX. Ansible Towers powers enterprise automation by adding control, security and delegation capabilities to Ansible environments.
Docker, Kubernetes, iOS support & 100+ preinstalled Tools;Customizable Continuous Delivery Pipelines;Customizable Stages, Parallel Execution and Control Flow Switches;Secrets and Dependency Management;Powerful Command Line Interface;Autoscale and Pay Only What you Use;Project Timeline Shows All Development Activities at a Glance;Dashboard Shows You All Projects That You Participate in;Seamless GitHub Integration - One Click To Add a Project;Automatically Test Your App After Every Change;New Branches are Added & Removed Automatically;Know If a Pull Request Is Good To Merge;Review Every Version in Branch History;Easily Run Your Tests in Parallel Threads;Projects are Autoconfigured for Testing;	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 15.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.6K
Stacks 190	Stacks 138
Followers 187	Followers 259
Votes 83	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 20 Easy setup 15 Fast builds 14 Free for private github repos 8 Great customer support 6 Free for open source	Pros 1 Open source
Integrations
GitHub Slack Heroku Docker Kubernetes	Ansible

What are some alternatives to Semaphore, AWX?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

AWX vs Semaphore: What are the differences?

AWX and Semaphore are both popular tools used for continuous integration and deployment. Here are the key differences between them.

Deployment model: AWX is an open-source tool that allows users to operate it on their own infrastructure. This gives users complete control over their environment and data. On the other hand, Semaphore is a cloud-based CI/CD platform that handles all the infrastructure and management tasks, providing a hassle-free experience for users.
Pricing and scalability: AWX being an open-source tool is free to use, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations on a tight budget. In contrast, Semaphore offers different pricing plans based on the user's requirements, providing scalability options for businesses of all sizes.
Integration capabilities: AWX supports a wide range of integrations, including version control systems like Git and Subversion, as well as various notification systems. Semaphore also offers integration with popular tools like GitHub and Bitbucket, allowing seamless collaboration and automation within the development workflow.
Ease of use: AWX, being a self-hosted tool, requires the user to set up and maintain the infrastructure themselves. This may involve additional technical knowledge and effort. Semaphore, being a cloud-based platform, offers a user-friendly interface and takes care of the infrastructure, making it easier for users to get started with CI/CD.
Extensibility and customization: AWX being open-source, provides users the ability to customize and extend its capabilities according to their specific requirements. Semaphore, while not open-source, provides a range of customizations and configuration options, ensuring flexibility in the CI/CD pipeline.
Community support: AWX benefits from a strong and active open-source community, which means a large pool of resources and community-driven support. Semaphore, being a cloud-based platform, offers professional support and a dedicated customer success team to assist users in case of any issues or queries.

AWX vs Semaphore

Overview