Azure DevOps vs Sauce Labs: What are the differences?
Pricing Model: Azure DevOps offers a tiered pricing model based on the number of users, whereas Sauce Labs pricing is based on the number of concurrent virtual machines used.
Integration Capabilities: Azure DevOps provides comprehensive integration with Microsoft tools and services, while Sauce Labs focuses more on seamless integration with popular test automation frameworks.
Focus on DevOps vs Testing: Azure DevOps is a complete DevOps solution that covers the entire software development lifecycle, while Sauce Labs is primarily focused on automated testing in the cloud.
Deployment Flexibility: Azure DevOps provides on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployment options, whereas Sauce Labs is a fully cloud-based testing platform.
Supported Technologies: Azure DevOps supports a wide range of technologies and programming languages, whereas Sauce Labs is known for its robust support for automated testing of web and mobile applications.
Scalability: Azure DevOps can handle large-scale enterprise projects with ease, while Sauce Labs is more suitable for small to medium-sized teams looking for scalable testing infrastructure.
In Summary, Azure DevOps and Sauce Labs offer different strengths in terms of pricing, integration, focus, deployment options, technology support, and scalability.
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.
I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools
Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
700+ browser/OS/device combinations for cross-browser and platform testing to improve web and mobile app quality and eliminate the overhead of internal infrastructure; Highly reliable, on-demand cloud for enterprise-grade scalability and industry standard security; Optimized for popular testing frameworks, CI systems, and surrounding tools and services; Works with Selenium and Appium based on industry standard Selenium WebDriver protocol. Compatible with existing tests in any popular language and testing framework; Identify test failures quickly with debugging tools like screenshots, video recordings, and detailed logs
Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards;
Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI;
Git: free private repositories, pull requests;
Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics;
Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux;
Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing;
Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails;
Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products;
Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages;
IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio;
Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
Stacks
314
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
435
Followers
2.9K
Votes
439
Votes
249
Pros & Cons
Pros
60
Selenium-compatible
46
Webdriver compatible
35
Video recordings of every test
31
Qa
29
Mobile support
Cons
2
Relatively slow
2
Expensive
Pros
56
Complete and powerful
32
Huge extension ecosystem
27
Azure integration
26
Flexible and powerful
26
One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI
Cons
8
Still dependant on C# for agents
5
Many in devops disregard MS altogether
5
Half Baked
4
Not a requirements management tool
4
Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile
