Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs TeamCity: What are the differences?
Azure DevOps and TeamCity are two popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) within software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.
Ease of Use: Azure DevOps provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users. On the other hand, TeamCity has a steeper learning curve and may require more configuration and setup.
Platform Support: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based platform that supports various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. In contrast, TeamCity is primarily designed for Windows-based environments, although it does offer limited support for Linux.
Integration Capabilities: Azure DevOps allows seamless integration with other Microsoft tools and services such as Visual Studio, Azure Cloud, and GitHub. TeamCity, on the other hand, offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with popular build tools, version control systems, and third-party services.
Scalability and Performance: Azure DevOps is highly scalable and can handle large enterprise projects with thousands of users. It offers robust infrastructure and adequate performance for large-scale organizations. TeamCity, although it can handle medium-sized projects effectively, may encounter performance issues when dealing with extensive build configurations or a large number of users.
Pricing Model: Azure DevOps offers a tiered pricing model with flexible options, including free plans for small teams and paid plans for larger organizations. TeamCity, on the other hand, follows a per-agent licensing model, which can be cost-effective for smaller projects but may become expensive for larger deployments.
Deployment Options: Azure DevOps provides both cloud-hosted and on-premises deployment options, giving organizations the flexibility to choose. TeamCity primarily offers an on-premises deployment model, which can restrict access and collaboration for distributed teams.
In summary, Azure DevOps stands out due to its user-friendly interface, extensive integration capabilities, and scalability for large enterprise projects. On the other hand, TeamCity excels in its compatibility with Windows environments, cost-effective licensing for smaller teams, and wide range of available plugins. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of TeamCity
- Easy to configure61
- Reliable and high-quality37
- User friendly32
- On premise32
- Github integration32
- Great UI18
- Smart16
- Free for open source12
- Can run jobs in parallel12
- Crossplatform8
- Chain dependencies5
- Fully-functional out of the box5
- Great support by jetbrains4
- REST API4
- Projects hierarchy4
- 100+ plugins4
- Personal notifications3
- Free for small teams3
- Build templates3
- Per-project permissions3
- Upload build artifacts2
- Smart build failure analysis and tracking2
- Ide plugins2
- GitLab integration2
- Artifact dependencies2
- Official reliable support2
- Build progress messages promoting from running process2
- Repository-stored, full settings dsl with ide support1
- Built-in artifacts repository1
- Powerful build chains / pipelines1
- TeamCity Professional is FREE1
- High-Availability0
- Hosted internally0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of TeamCity
- High costs for more than three build agents3
- Proprietary2
- User-friendly2
- User friendly2