StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Azure DevOps vs TeamCity

Azure DevOps vs TeamCity

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TeamCity
TeamCity
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.1K
Votes316
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.9K
Votes249

Azure DevOps vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Azure DevOps and TeamCity are two popular tools used for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) within software development projects. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Ease of Use: Azure DevOps provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users. On the other hand, TeamCity has a steeper learning curve and may require more configuration and setup.

  2. Platform Support: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based platform that supports various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. In contrast, TeamCity is primarily designed for Windows-based environments, although it does offer limited support for Linux.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Azure DevOps allows seamless integration with other Microsoft tools and services such as Visual Studio, Azure Cloud, and GitHub. TeamCity, on the other hand, offers a wide range of plugins and integrations with popular build tools, version control systems, and third-party services.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Azure DevOps is highly scalable and can handle large enterprise projects with thousands of users. It offers robust infrastructure and adequate performance for large-scale organizations. TeamCity, although it can handle medium-sized projects effectively, may encounter performance issues when dealing with extensive build configurations or a large number of users.

  5. Pricing Model: Azure DevOps offers a tiered pricing model with flexible options, including free plans for small teams and paid plans for larger organizations. TeamCity, on the other hand, follows a per-agent licensing model, which can be cost-effective for smaller projects but may become expensive for larger deployments.

  6. Deployment Options: Azure DevOps provides both cloud-hosted and on-premises deployment options, giving organizations the flexibility to choose. TeamCity primarily offers an on-premises deployment model, which can restrict access and collaboration for distributed teams.

In summary, Azure DevOps stands out due to its user-friendly interface, extensive integration capabilities, and scalability for large enterprise projects. On the other hand, TeamCity excels in its compatibility with Windows environments, cost-effective licensing for smaller teams, and wide range of available plugins. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

TeamCity
TeamCity
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
2.7K
Followers
1.1K
Followers
2.9K
Votes
316
Votes
249
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 61
    Easy to configure
  • 37
    Reliable and high-quality
  • 32
    Github integration
  • 32
    User friendly
  • 32
    On premise
Cons
  • 3
    High costs for more than three build agents
  • 2
    Proprietary
  • 2
    User-friendly
  • 2
    User friendly
Pros
  • 56
    Complete and powerful
  • 32
    Huge extension ecosystem
  • 27
    Azure integration
  • 26
    One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI
  • 26
    Flexible and powerful
Cons
  • 8
    Still dependant on C# for agents
  • 5
    Many in devops disregard MS altogether
  • 5
    Half Baked
  • 4
    Jack of all trades, master of none
  • 4
    Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile
Integrations
Slack
Slack
GitHub
GitHub
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Docker
Docker
Slack
Slack
Trello
Trello
Git
Git
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Jenkins
Jenkins
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to TeamCity, Azure DevOps?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana