Jenkins vs TeamCity

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

TeamCity

Stacks1.2K

Followers1.1K

Votes316

Jenkins vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, I have compared the key differences between Jenkins and TeamCity.

Ease of use: Jenkins is known for its flexibility and customization options, which make it suitable for complex projects. However, it requires more effort and time to set up and configure. On the other hand, TeamCity is known for its user-friendly interface, easy installation process, and simplicity. It provides a more streamlined experience, especially for beginners.
Scalability: Jenkins is highly scalable and can support larger teams and complex projects. It allows distributed builds and can be easily integrated with third-party tools through plugins. TeamCity, while also scalable, is more focused on small to medium-sized teams. It offers a simpler setup and configuration process, but may not provide as much flexibility for larger enterprise projects.
Build configurations: Jenkins uses XML-based configuration files to define build steps and actions. This allows for more flexibility and customization options, but it can be more complex and time-consuming to set up. TeamCity, on the other hand, provides a more intuitive and visual approach to defining build configurations. It allows users to configure builds through a user-friendly web interface, making it easier to define and manage build steps.
Accessibility: Jenkins is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and has a large community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement. It is available on various platforms and can be installed on a local server or on cloud platforms. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a commercial tool developed by JetBrains. It comes with a free version with limited features, but for more advanced functionality, a license needs to be purchased.
Plugin ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast library of plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. This allows users to add features and integrations from various third-party tools. TeamCity also supports plugins, but its ecosystem is not as extensive as Jenkins. While it provides essential integrations, there may be limited options for specific tools or services.
Support and documentation: Jenkins has a large and active community that provides support and troubleshooting assistance. There are various online resources, documentation, and forums available to help users with any issues or questions they may have. TeamCity, being a commercially supported product, offers official support from the JetBrains team. It also provides comprehensive documentation and offers professional services for more advanced support needs.

In summary, Jenkins offers more flexibility and customization options, making it suitable for larger teams and complex projects. TeamCity, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more user-friendly experience, making it ideal for smaller teams or users who prefer a streamlined approach to continuous integration and delivery.

Why do developers choose TeamCity vs Jenkins?

TeamCity users site its easy configurability, reliability, and great UI as factors in choosing it over other options.
Users of Jenkins laud it for being open source, a deciding factor for many developers. In addition they list its plugin and integration ecosystem as pros.

What are some alternatives to TeamCity and Jenkins?

Travis CI - A hosted continuous integration service for open source and private projects
CircleCI - Continuous integration and delivery platform to help teams rapidly release code with confidence
Codeship - A continuous integration platform in the cloud

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, TeamCity

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Pedro Gil

Head of Engineering at lengoo GmbH

May 4, 2021

Decided

We replaced Jenkins with Github Actions for all our repositories hosted on Github. GA has two significant benefits for us compared to an external build tool: it's simpler, and it sits at eye level.

Its simplicity and smooth user experience makes it easier for all developers to adopt, giving them more autonomy.

Sitting at eye level means it's completely run and configured right alongside the code, so that it's easier to observe and adjust our builds as we go.

These two benefits have made "the build" less of a system engineer responsibility and more of a developer tool, giving developers more ownership from code to release.

77.6k views77.6k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	TeamCity
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Automate code analyzing, compiling, and testing processes, with having instant feedback on build progress, problems, and test failures, all in a simple, intuitive web-interface; Simplified setup: create projects from just a VCS repository URL;Run multiple builds and tests under different configurations and platforms simultaneously; Make sure your team sustains an uninterrupted workflow with the help of Pretested commits and Personal builds; Have build history insight with customizable statistics on build duration, success rate, code quality, and custom metrics; Enable cost-effective on-demand build infrastructure scaling thanks to tight integration with Amazon EC2; Easily extend TeamCity functionality and add new integrations using Java API; Great visual project representation. Track any changes made by any user in the system, filter projects and choose style of visual change status representation;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 1.2K
Followers 50.4K	Followers 1.1K
Votes 2.2K	Votes 316
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines	Pros 61 Easy to configure 37 Reliable and high-quality 32 Github integration 32 User friendly 32 On premise Cons 3 High costs for more than three build agents 2 User-friendly 2 User friendly 2 Proprietary
Integrations
No integrations available	Slack

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, TeamCity?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Appveyor

AppVeyor aims to give powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment tools to every .NET developer without the hassle of setting up and maintaining their own build server.

Related Comparisons

Jenkins vs TeamCity: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, I have compared the key differences between Jenkins and TeamCity.

Ease of use: Jenkins is known for its flexibility and customization options, which make it suitable for complex projects. However, it requires more effort and time to set up and configure. On the other hand, TeamCity is known for its user-friendly interface, easy installation process, and simplicity. It provides a more streamlined experience, especially for beginners.
Scalability: Jenkins is highly scalable and can support larger teams and complex projects. It allows distributed builds and can be easily integrated with third-party tools through plugins. TeamCity, while also scalable, is more focused on small to medium-sized teams. It offers a simpler setup and configuration process, but may not provide as much flexibility for larger enterprise projects.
Build configurations: Jenkins uses XML-based configuration files to define build steps and actions. This allows for more flexibility and customization options, but it can be more complex and time-consuming to set up. TeamCity, on the other hand, provides a more intuitive and visual approach to defining build configurations. It allows users to configure builds through a user-friendly web interface, making it easier to define and manage build steps.
Accessibility: Jenkins is an open-source tool, which means it is free to use and has a large community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement. It is available on various platforms and can be installed on a local server or on cloud platforms. TeamCity, on the other hand, is a commercial tool developed by JetBrains. It comes with a free version with limited features, but for more advanced functionality, a license needs to be purchased.
Plugin ecosystem: Jenkins has a vast library of plugins that can be used to extend its functionality. This allows users to add features and integrations from various third-party tools. TeamCity also supports plugins, but its ecosystem is not as extensive as Jenkins. While it provides essential integrations, there may be limited options for specific tools or services.
Support and documentation: Jenkins has a large and active community that provides support and troubleshooting assistance. There are various online resources, documentation, and forums available to help users with any issues or questions they may have. TeamCity, being a commercially supported product, offers official support from the JetBrains team. It also provides comprehensive documentation and offers professional services for more advanced support needs.

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Overview

Jenkins vs TeamCity: What are the differences?