Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Backand

22
51
+ 1
9
Firebase

41.1K
35.2K
+ 1
2K
Add tool

Backand vs Firebase: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Backand and Firebase

1. Backend as a Service (BaaS): - Backand is a BaaS platform that provides a complete backend solution, including database management, security, user authentication, and server-side logic. - Firebase, on the other hand, is a comprehensive development platform that offers a variety of services, including a BaaS component. It focuses on real-time database, authentication, hosting, and cloud functions.

2. Real-time Database: - Firebase offers a real-time database that allows data to be synchronized in real-time across clients. It uses a NoSQL JSON-based structure for storing data, enabling quick and efficient retrieval and updates. - Backand provides a traditional relational database with the option to create custom queries, but it does not have built-in real-time capabilities like Firebase.

3. Server-side Logic: - Backand allows developers to write server-side logic using JavaScript, which can be executed based on specific triggers, such as before or after CRUD operations. This enables custom business logic to be implemented on the server side. - Firebase offers cloud functions, which are serverless functions that can be written in JavaScript or TypeScript. These functions can be triggered by different events, such as database changes or HTTP requests, allowing developers to add custom logic on the server side.

4. File Storage: - Firebase provides a service called Firebase Storage, which allows developers to store and manage user-generated files, such as images or videos. This service is optimized for handling large files and provides features like resumable uploads and security rules. - Backand does not have a built-in file storage service, so developers need to integrate with external storage providers or implement file storage on their own.

5. Authentication: - Firebase offers various authentication methods, including email and password, social logins (e.g., Google, Facebook), and anonymous authentication. It provides ready-to-use authentication UI components and handles user management and authentication flow. - Backand also supports multiple authentication methods, but it does not provide pre-built UI components. Developers need to implement the authentication UI themselves, although Backand provides APIs for authentication management.

6. Pricing and Scalability: - Firebase offers a free plan with generous usage limits and flexible pricing for additional usage. It can scale seamlessly to handle large amounts of data and high traffic. - Backand also offers a free plan, but its pricing structure is more focused on enterprise-level usage. It provides options for scaling and performance optimization, but it may not be as cost-effective for small-scale projects as Firebase.

In Summary, Backand is a BaaS platform with a focus on backend development and server-side logic, while Firebase is a comprehensive development platform that offers various services, including BaaS, real-time database, authentication, and file storage. Firebase provides more ready-to-use components and a flexible pricing structure, making it suitable for a wide range of projects, while Backand caters more towards enterprise-level usage and customization options.

Advice on Backand and Firebase
Needs advice
on
ApolloApolloFirebaseFirebase
and
Socket.IOSocket.IO

We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.

See more
Replies (3)
Timothy Malstead
Junior Full Stack Developer at Freelance · | 7 upvotes · 485.9K views
Recommends
on
FirebaseFirebase

I would recommend looking hard into Firebase for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.

The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.

Node.js Express MongoDB Socket.IO and Apollo are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.

Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase is a great way to do that.

See more
Recommends
on
AblyAbly

Hello Noam 👋,

I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.

Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase

See more
Recommends
on
8base8base

Hey Noam,

I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.

Thanks, Ilya

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Backand
Pros of Firebase
  • 4
    Let's you focus on the frontend and have killer backend
  • 4
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Ready-to-use backend in no time
  • 371
    Realtime backend made easy
  • 270
    Fast and responsive
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 215
    Real-time
  • 191
    JSON
  • 134
    Free
  • 128
    Backed by google
  • 83
    Angular adaptor
  • 68
    Reliable
  • 36
    Great customer support
  • 32
    Great documentation
  • 25
    Real-time synchronization
  • 21
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Rapid prototyping
  • 14
    Great security
  • 12
    Automatic scaling
  • 11
    Freakingly awesome
  • 8
    Super fast development
  • 8
    Angularfire is an amazing addition!
  • 8
    Chat
  • 6
    Firebase hosting
  • 6
    Built in user auth/oauth
  • 6
    Awesome next-gen backend
  • 6
    Ios adaptor
  • 4
    Speed of light
  • 4
    Very easy to use
  • 3
    Great
  • 3
    It's made development super fast
  • 3
    Brilliant for startups
  • 2
    Free hosting
  • 2
    Cloud functions
  • 2
    JS Offline and Sync suport
  • 2
    Low battery consumption
  • 2
    .net
  • 2
    The concurrent updates create a great experience
  • 2
    Push notification
  • 2
    I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
  • 2
    Great all-round functionality
  • 2
    Free authentication solution
  • 1
    Easy Reactjs integration
  • 1
    Google's support
  • 1
    Free SSL
  • 1
    CDN & cache out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Large
  • 1
    Faster workflow
  • 1
    Serverless
  • 1
    Good Free Limits
  • 1
    Simple and easy

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Backand
Cons of Firebase
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 31
      Can become expensive
    • 16
      No open source, you depend on external company
    • 15
      Scalability is not infinite
    • 9
      Not Flexible Enough
    • 7
      Cant filter queries
    • 3
      Very unstable server
    • 3
      No Relational Data
    • 2
      Too many errors
    • 2
      No offline sync

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Backand?

    Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

    What is Firebase?

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Backand?
    What companies use Firebase?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Backand?
    What tools integrate with Firebase?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitNode.jsFirebase+5
    7
    2414
    What are some alternatives to Backand and Firebase?
    NGINX
    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.
    Apache HTTP Server
    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Amazon Web Services (AWS)
    It is a comprehensive and broadly adopted cloud platform, offering over 200 fully featured services from data centers globally.
    Heroku
    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.
    See all alternatives