Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Backand vs Firebase: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Backand and Firebase
1. Backend as a Service (BaaS): - Backand is a BaaS platform that provides a complete backend solution, including database management, security, user authentication, and server-side logic. - Firebase, on the other hand, is a comprehensive development platform that offers a variety of services, including a BaaS component. It focuses on real-time database, authentication, hosting, and cloud functions.
2. Real-time Database: - Firebase offers a real-time database that allows data to be synchronized in real-time across clients. It uses a NoSQL JSON-based structure for storing data, enabling quick and efficient retrieval and updates. - Backand provides a traditional relational database with the option to create custom queries, but it does not have built-in real-time capabilities like Firebase.
3. Server-side Logic: - Backand allows developers to write server-side logic using JavaScript, which can be executed based on specific triggers, such as before or after CRUD operations. This enables custom business logic to be implemented on the server side. - Firebase offers cloud functions, which are serverless functions that can be written in JavaScript or TypeScript. These functions can be triggered by different events, such as database changes or HTTP requests, allowing developers to add custom logic on the server side.
4. File Storage: - Firebase provides a service called Firebase Storage, which allows developers to store and manage user-generated files, such as images or videos. This service is optimized for handling large files and provides features like resumable uploads and security rules. - Backand does not have a built-in file storage service, so developers need to integrate with external storage providers or implement file storage on their own.
5. Authentication: - Firebase offers various authentication methods, including email and password, social logins (e.g., Google, Facebook), and anonymous authentication. It provides ready-to-use authentication UI components and handles user management and authentication flow. - Backand also supports multiple authentication methods, but it does not provide pre-built UI components. Developers need to implement the authentication UI themselves, although Backand provides APIs for authentication management.
6. Pricing and Scalability: - Firebase offers a free plan with generous usage limits and flexible pricing for additional usage. It can scale seamlessly to handle large amounts of data and high traffic. - Backand also offers a free plan, but its pricing structure is more focused on enterprise-level usage. It provides options for scaling and performance optimization, but it may not be as cost-effective for small-scale projects as Firebase.
In Summary, Backand is a BaaS platform with a focus on backend development and server-side logic, while Firebase is a comprehensive development platform that offers various services, including BaaS, real-time database, authentication, and file storage. Firebase provides more ready-to-use components and a flexible pricing structure, making it suitable for a wide range of projects, while Backand caters more towards enterprise-level usage and customization options.
We are starting to work on a web-based platform aiming to connect artists (clients) and professional freelancers (service providers). In-app, timeline-based, real-time communication between users (& storing it), file transfers, and push notifications are essential core features. We are considering using Node.js, ExpressJS, React, MongoDB stack with Socket.IO & Apollo, or maybe using Real-Time Database and functionalities of Firebase.
I would recommend looking hard into Firebase
for this project, especially if you do not have dedicated full-stack or backend members on your team.
The real time database, as you mentioned, is a great option, but I would also look into Firestore
. Similar to RTDB, it adds more functions and some cool methods as well. Also, another great thing about Firebase is you have easy access to storage and dead simple auth as well.
Node.js
Express
MongoDB
Socket.IO
and Apollo
are great technologies as well, and may be the better option if you do not wish to cede as much control to third parties in your application.
Overall, I say if you wish to focus more time developing your React
application instead of other parts of your stack, Firebase
is a great way to do that.
Hello Noam 👋,
I suggest taking a look at Ably, it has all the realtime features you need and the platform is designed to guarantee critical functionality at scale.
Here is an in depth comparison between Ably and Firebase
Hey Noam,
I would recommend you to take a look into 8base. It has features you've requested, also relation database and GraphQL API which will help you to develop rapidly.
Thanks, Ilya
Pros of Backand
- Let's you focus on the frontend and have killer backend4
- Easy setup4
- Ready-to-use backend in no time1
Pros of Firebase
- Realtime backend made easy371
- Fast and responsive270
- Easy setup242
- Real-time215
- JSON191
- Free134
- Backed by google128
- Angular adaptor83
- Reliable68
- Great customer support36
- Great documentation32
- Real-time synchronization25
- Mobile friendly21
- Rapid prototyping19
- Great security14
- Automatic scaling12
- Freakingly awesome11
- Super fast development8
- Angularfire is an amazing addition!8
- Chat8
- Firebase hosting6
- Built in user auth/oauth6
- Awesome next-gen backend6
- Ios adaptor6
- Speed of light4
- Very easy to use4
- Great3
- It's made development super fast3
- Brilliant for startups3
- Free hosting2
- Cloud functions2
- JS Offline and Sync suport2
- Low battery consumption2
- .net2
- The concurrent updates create a great experience2
- Push notification2
- I can quickly create static web apps with no backend2
- Great all-round functionality2
- Free authentication solution2
- Easy Reactjs integration1
- Google's support1
- Free SSL1
- CDN & cache out of the box1
- Easy to use1
- Large1
- Faster workflow1
- Serverless1
- Good Free Limits1
- Simple and easy1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Backand
Cons of Firebase
- Can become expensive31
- No open source, you depend on external company16
- Scalability is not infinite15
- Not Flexible Enough9
- Cant filter queries7
- Very unstable server3
- No Relational Data3
- Too many errors2
- No offline sync2