Backlog vs Confluence: What are the differences?

# Introduction

1. **User Interface**:
Backlog has a simple and streamlined interface focused on task management and tracking, while Confluence offers a more collaborative platform with emphasis on documentation and knowledge sharing. 
2. **Functionality**:
Backlog is designed primarily for project management, providing features like task tracking, Gantt charts, and sprint planning. In contrast, Confluence is a team collaboration software aimed at creating, organizing, and sharing content such as documents, meeting notes, and project plans.
3. **Integration**:
Backlog is more integrated with development tools like Git and SVN, offering seamless version control and repository management within the platform. Confluence, on the other hand, integrates well with other Atlassian products such as Jira and Trello for comprehensive project management capabilities.
4. **Permissions**:
In Backlog, permissions are typically assigned at the project level, allowing for granular control over who can view, edit, or manage tasks within specific projects. Confluence offers more flexible permission settings that can be configured at the space level, giving users more control over access to different types of content.
5. **Customization**:
Backlog provides limited customization options, focusing more on out-of-the-box project management solutions. Confluence, however, allows for extensive customization through plugins and macros, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific needs.
6. **Content Organization**:
Backlog organizes tasks hierarchically within a project, following a linear structure of tasks, subtasks, and milestones. In contrast, Confluence uses a more fluid approach to content organization through spaces, pages, and linking, allowing for a more dynamic and interconnected knowledge base.

In Summary, Backlog and Confluence differ in terms of user interface, functionality, integration, permissions, customization, and content organization.