StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs Docker Compose

Bamboo vs Docker Compose

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Stacks22.3K
Followers16.5K
Votes501
GitHub Stars36.4K
Forks5.5K

Bamboo vs Docker Compose: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Environment: Bamboo is a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating the build and release process. It primarily targets deploying applications to various environments. Docker Compose, on the other hand, is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications. It focuses on managing containers and their interactions within a single host environment.

  2. Architecture: Bamboo is more suitable for applications that require deployment to multiple servers with various configurations. It supports connecting to different types of servers and executing deployment tasks. Docker Compose, however, is designed for development environments where multiple containers need to be managed together. It simplifies the process of running applications with multiple interconnected services locally.

  3. Resource Isolation: In Bamboo, the level of isolation provided between different deployment environments is primarily dependent on how users configure the servers and agent pools. Docker Compose, on the other hand, provides containerization, which offers a higher level of resource isolation between services running within the same host environment. Each service can have its own resources and dependencies encapsulated within a container.

  4. Scalability: Bamboo supports scaling up by adding more agents to distribute build and deployment tasks across multiple machines. It enables parallel execution of tasks to improve efficiency. Docker Compose allows scalability through the concept of services, where multiple instances of a service can be run to handle increased workload. It simplifies the process of scaling individual components of an application.

  5. Portability: Bamboo is more tied to the Atlassian ecosystem, making it easier to integrate with other Atlassian tools like Jira and Bitbucket. While it provides versatility within this ecosystem, it may be less portable to non-Atlassian environments. Docker Compose, being built on Docker technology, offers higher portability as containers can be run on any host with Docker support. This makes it more agnostic to specific ecosystems.

  6. Development Environment Dependency: Bamboo does not focus on managing the development environment itself, instead emphasizing the build and deployment processes. Docker Compose, however, assists in creating a consistent development environment for developers by defining the services needed for an application in a docker-compose.yml file. It helps in ensuring that the development environment matches the production setup more closely.

In Summary, Key differences between Bamboo and Docker Compose lie in their focus on deployment environments, architecture, resource isolation, scalability, portability, and development environment dependency.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
Docker Compose
Docker Compose

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.5K
Stacks
504
Stacks
22.3K
Followers
549
Followers
16.5K
Votes
17
Votes
501
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
Pros
  • 123
    Multi-container descriptor
  • 110
    Fast development environment setup
  • 79
    Easy linking of containers
  • 68
    Simple yaml configuration
  • 60
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 9
    Tied to single machine
  • 5
    Still very volatile, changing syntax often
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, Docker Compose?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana