Bamboo vs Docker Swarm

Overview

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

Docker Swarm

Stacks779

Followers990

Votes282

Bamboo vs Docker Swarm: What are the differences?

Scalability: One key difference between Bamboo and Docker Swarm is scalability. Bamboo is primarily a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating software delivery processes, while Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool designed to manage a cluster of Docker engines. Docker Swarm provides built-in scalability features to easily scale up or down based on workload demands, while Bamboo may require additional configuration or third-party tools for similar scalability capabilities.
Container Management: Another significant difference is the focus on container management. Docker Swarm is specifically built for container orchestration, allowing users to deploy and manage containers across a cluster of machines seamlessly. In contrast, Bamboo is more focused on the automation of build, test, and deployment processes for applications, without the same level of direct container management capabilities as Docker Swarm.
Compatibility: Docker Swarm is tightly integrated with Docker Engine, as it is a native orchestration tool for Docker containers. This integration ensures compatibility and seamless interaction between Docker Swarm and Docker containers, simplifying the deployment and management of containerized applications. Bamboo, on the other hand, supports various build tools and technologies, providing more flexibility but potentially requiring additional configurations for container deployments.
Resource Utilization: Docker Swarm offers more efficient resource utilization through its container orchestration capabilities. It enables optimal distribution of containers across a cluster, ensuring better resource allocation and utilization. Bamboo, while capable of automating deployment processes, may not have the same level of resource optimization features as Docker Swarm, especially when it comes to container-based applications.
Community Support: Docker Swarm benefits from the extensive Docker community and ecosystem, with a wide range of resources, plugins, and support available for users. This strong community support can simplify troubleshooting, integration with other tools, and staying up-to-date with best practices. Bamboo, while having its own user base and community, may not offer the same breadth and depth of resources specifically tailored to container orchestration and management.

In Summary, Bamboo and Docker Swarm differ in terms of scalability, container management, compatibility, resource utilization, and community support, making them suitable for different use cases and environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bamboo, Docker Swarm

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo	Docker Swarm
Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.	Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.
Statistics
Stacks 504	Stacks 779
Followers 549	Followers 990
Votes 17	Votes 282
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Low community support 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI	Pros 55 Docker friendly 46 Easy to setup 40 Standard Docker API 38 Easy to use 23 Native Cons 9 Low adoption
Integrations
Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat	Docker

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, Docker Swarm?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bamboo vs Docker Swarm: What are the differences?

Scalability: One key difference between Bamboo and Docker Swarm is scalability. Bamboo is primarily a continuous integration and deployment tool that focuses on automating software delivery processes, while Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool designed to manage a cluster of Docker engines. Docker Swarm provides built-in scalability features to easily scale up or down based on workload demands, while Bamboo may require additional configuration or third-party tools for similar scalability capabilities.
Container Management: Another significant difference is the focus on container management. Docker Swarm is specifically built for container orchestration, allowing users to deploy and manage containers across a cluster of machines seamlessly. In contrast, Bamboo is more focused on the automation of build, test, and deployment processes for applications, without the same level of direct container management capabilities as Docker Swarm.
Compatibility: Docker Swarm is tightly integrated with Docker Engine, as it is a native orchestration tool for Docker containers. This integration ensures compatibility and seamless interaction between Docker Swarm and Docker containers, simplifying the deployment and management of containerized applications. Bamboo, on the other hand, supports various build tools and technologies, providing more flexibility but potentially requiring additional configurations for container deployments.
Resource Utilization: Docker Swarm offers more efficient resource utilization through its container orchestration capabilities. It enables optimal distribution of containers across a cluster, ensuring better resource allocation and utilization. Bamboo, while capable of automating deployment processes, may not have the same level of resource optimization features as Docker Swarm, especially when it comes to container-based applications.
Community Support: Docker Swarm benefits from the extensive Docker community and ecosystem, with a wide range of resources, plugins, and support available for users. This strong community support can simplify troubleshooting, integration with other tools, and staying up-to-date with best practices. Bamboo, while having its own user base and community, may not offer the same breadth and depth of resources specifically tailored to container orchestration and management.

Bamboo vs Docker Swarm

Overview