Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Bit vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Bit and Bitbucket, highlighting their key differences.
Integration with Other Tools: Bit allows seamless integration with popular development tools and frameworks such as React, Vue, and Angular. It offers a powerful command-line interface for easy collaboration among developers. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers comprehensive integration with Atlassian's suite of products, including Jira for issue tracking and Confluence for team collaboration.
Code Repository Management: Bit provides a distributed and decentralized Git-based code repository management system. It focuses on component-driven development, allowing developers to share and reuse components across projects. In contrast, Bitbucket is a centralized Git repository hosting service that enables developers to store, manage, and collaborate on their code repositories.
Pricing: Bit offers a free tier with limited features and usage, making it suitable for personal projects and small teams. It also provides flexible pricing plans for larger teams and enterprises. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, with the free tier supporting up to 5 users. However, for larger teams and more advanced features, paid plans are available.
Code Review and Collaboration Features: Bit offers a rich set of code review and collaboration features. It allows developers to review, comment, and suggest changes on individual components, promoting effective collaboration. Bitbucket also offers similar code review features, allowing developers to review and collaborate on code changes through pull requests.
Continuous Integration and Deployment (CI/CD): Bit integrates with popular CI/CD platforms like Travis CI, CircleCI, and Jenkins, providing advanced automation and deployment capabilities. It allows developers to automate the build, test, and deployment processes for their components. On the other hand, Bitbucket provides built-in CI/CD capabilities with pipelines, allowing developers to configure and automate their development workflows.
Security and Permissions: Bit focuses on providing granular security and permissions controls, allowing administrators to manage access to specific components and repositories. It includes features like role-based access control, two-factor authentication, and auditing. Bitbucket also offers robust security features with fine-grained access controls, branch restrictions, and user management capabilities.
In summary, Bit and Bitbucket differ in terms of integration with other tools, code repository management approach, pricing plans, code review and collaboration features, CI/CD capabilities, and security and permissions controls.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bit
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos905
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools349
- Unlimited private repositories342
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Source Code Insight7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Mercurial Support2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- Academic license program2
- IAM integration2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bit
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Bit?
What is Bitbucket?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4
+32+34