Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Gitea

Stacks322

Followers448

Votes123

GitHub Stars51.8K

Forks6.2K

Bitbucket vs Gitea: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bitbucket and Gitea are both popular version control systems that allow developers to manage and collaborate on code repositories. While they serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two platforms. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight their unique features and functionalities.

Hosting Options: Bitbucket is a cloud-based service, hosted and managed by Atlassian, whereas Gitea is a self-hosted solution that can be deployed on-premises or on a cloud server of your choice. This enables users to have more control over their repository's data and customize the environment according to their specific needs.
Community Support: Gitea, being an open-source platform, benefits from a large and active community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers support services and resources directly from Atlassian, ensuring reliable support and assistance for its users.
User Interface and Customization: Bitbucket provides a sleek and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to navigate and utilize its features. Gitea, being open-source, offers a highly customizable interface that can be tailored to suit individual preferences and requirements. This flexibility allows users to adapt the platform's appearance and functionality to meet their specific needs.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian tools, such as Jira and Trello, providing a comprehensive solution for project management and collaboration. Gitea, on the other hand, offers a wide range of integrations with various third-party tools and services, allowing users to build a customized development workflow with their preferred tools.
Scalability and Performance: Bitbucket has the advantage of being backed by Atlassian's infrastructure, providing robust scalability and high-performance capabilities. Gitea, being self-hosted, can be optimized to meet specific performance requirements and can scale according to the hardware and resources allocated to it.
Pricing Model: Bitbucket offers a freemium pricing model, with free plans for small teams and paid plans with additional features and increased user limits. Gitea, being open-source, is completely free to use, with no limitations on the number of users or repositories. This cost-effectiveness makes Gitea a popular choice for organizations with tight budgets or large development teams.

In summary, Bitbucket is a cloud-based version control system with seamless integration with other Atlassian tools, while Gitea is a self-hosted, highly customizable platform with strong community support and a free pricing model. The choice between the two depends on factors such as hosting preferences, customization needs, integration requirements, and budget considerations.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on Bitbucket, Gitea

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

740k views740k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Gitea
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 51.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.2K
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 322
Followers 33.4K	Followers 448
Votes 2.8K	Votes 123
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 24 Self-hosted 16 Lightweight 15 Free 12 Simple 9 Easy Setup Cons 3 Community-fork of Gogs 0 Easy Windows authentication is not supported
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Raspberry Pi DingTalk Discord OpenLDAP Drone.io Jenkins Vagrant MySQL SQLite PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Gitea?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.