Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Famo.us vs Blazejs: What are the differences?
What is Famo.us? A JavaScript framework for everyone who wants to build beautiful experiences on any device. Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.
What is Blazejs? *Powerful library for creating user interfaces *. It is a powerful library for creating user interfaces by writing reactive HTML templates. Compared to using a combination of traditional templates and jQuery, it eliminates the need for all the “update logic” in your app that listens for data changes and manipulates the DOM.
Famo.us and Blazejs can be categorized as "Javascript UI Libraries" tools.
Famo.us and Blazejs are both open source tools. It seems that Famo.us with 6.47K GitHub stars and 763 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Blazejs with 438 GitHub stars and 89 GitHub forks.
React was a very contentious decision among the Meteor community. We started off with Blazejs, which itself was based off of Handlebars. We liked the HTML-like syntax of Blaze and how nurses, doctors, and other clinicians could become familiar with it. However, the code wasn't very reusable and it was neither modular nor composeable nor testable, and became a major headache to maintain. React solves the problems of composeability and reusability and testing isolation, at the price of having worked the problem backwards and having wound up with a quirky syntax that runs within Javascript that looks similar to HTML but isn't. Nonetheless, React is quickly become a classic example of functional programming techniques, what with its' pure components. All in all, an enjoyable technology to work with that brings some sanity to front-end user interfaces.
We chose React on the advice of the Meteor Development Group, which acts as our upstream technical advisors. We had a prior investment in BlazeJS, due to it's optimistic UI, latency compensation, and real-time updates. However, the BlazeJS code wasn't composable and didn't lead to good reuse, as it was already overly abstracted. It also carried with it a lot of baggage from the default HTML DOM. We have enjoyed React's functional components, deterministic rendering, testability, composability, and widespread support. It's taken some time to get used to, but fits in very well with a functional programming style. We had also taken a look at AngularJS components, but they were always half-baked in comparison to the active React community.
Pros of Blazejs
Pros of Famo.us
- Speedy as native apps14
- Future11
- WebGL9
- Javascript9
- Components6
- 3D physics engine6
- Open source6
- Performance5
- Rendering Engine for the Web5
- Runs on Android4
- Works with Angular3
- Works with Meteor3
- Runs on iOS3
- Great for mobile apps3
- Works with Backbone2
- Works with React2
- Replaces the need for native app development2
- FRP1