BlazeMeter vs Selenium

Overview

BlazeMeter

Stacks68

Followers158

Votes13

Selenium

Stacks16.2K

Followers12.6K

Votes527

GitHub Stars33.6K

Forks8.6K

BlazeMeter vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Testing Approach: BlazeMeter is a performance testing tool that focuses on simulating high traffic loads to test a system's performance under stress. On the other hand, Selenium is an automation testing tool that is primarily used for functional testing to automate web browsers for testing purposes.
Deployment: BlazeMeter is a cloud-based solution, providing scalability and ease of access for testers to run tests from anywhere. In contrast, Selenium requires the setup of test environments and infrastructure, making it more suitable for in-house testing teams.
Language Support: Selenium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, etc., allowing testers to choose a language they are comfortable with. BlazeMeter, on the other hand, primarily relies on JMeter scripts, which may be a limitation for testers who prefer other languages.
Reporting and Analytics: BlazeMeter offers advanced reporting and analytics features, providing detailed insights into test results and performance metrics. Selenium provides basic reporting capabilities and may require additional plugins or third-party tools for more advanced reporting.
Integration: BlazeMeter seamlessly integrates with various continuous integration tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, etc., for running performance tests as part of the build process. While Selenium can also be integrated with CI tools, the process may require more configuration and setup.
Learning Curve: BlazeMeter has a relatively steeper learning curve due to its focus on performance testing and using JMeter scripts. Selenium, being more popular and widely adopted, has a larger community and more resources available for learning, making it easier for testers to get started.

In Summary, the key differences between BlazeMeter and Selenium lie in their testing approach, deployment, language support, reporting capabilities, integration options, and learning curve suitability for different testing requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on BlazeMeter, Selenium

Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BlazeMeter	Selenium
Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>	Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
100% JMeter Compatible- Take full advantage of JMeter’s scripting capabilities or let our auto-scripting feature take care of the details.;Scalable and Realistic- Easily scale from 100 to 300,000+ concurrent users using realistic visitor behaviour and browser simulation.;Start Testing in 2 Minutes- Use up to 100 dedicated servers per test. No setup or installation required. Self-service and on-demand.;Intuitive Reporting- See test results in real time or easily compare multiple tests. All with a simple to use interface and intuitive graphs.;Pay only for what you need- Flexible pricing that accommodates hourly, monthly or annual usage. No setup or maintenance fees.<br>	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 33.6K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 8.6K
Stacks 68	Stacks 16.2K
Followers 158	Followers 12.6K
Votes 13	Votes 527
Pros & Cons
Pros 10 I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts. 3 Easy to prepare JMeter workers Cons 1 UI centric 1 Costly	Pros 177 Automates browsers 154 Testing 101 Essential tool for running test automation 24 Record-Playback 24 Remote Control Cons 8 Flaky tests 4 Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui) 2 Update browser drivers
Integrations
TeamCity Jenkins Bamboo CloudBees Heroku New Relic AppDynamics Amazon CloudWatch Travis CI	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BlazeMeter, Selenium?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

BlazeMeter vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Testing Approach: BlazeMeter is a performance testing tool that focuses on simulating high traffic loads to test a system's performance under stress. On the other hand, Selenium is an automation testing tool that is primarily used for functional testing to automate web browsers for testing purposes.
Deployment: BlazeMeter is a cloud-based solution, providing scalability and ease of access for testers to run tests from anywhere. In contrast, Selenium requires the setup of test environments and infrastructure, making it more suitable for in-house testing teams.
Language Support: Selenium supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Python, C#, etc., allowing testers to choose a language they are comfortable with. BlazeMeter, on the other hand, primarily relies on JMeter scripts, which may be a limitation for testers who prefer other languages.
Reporting and Analytics: BlazeMeter offers advanced reporting and analytics features, providing detailed insights into test results and performance metrics. Selenium provides basic reporting capabilities and may require additional plugins or third-party tools for more advanced reporting.
Integration: BlazeMeter seamlessly integrates with various continuous integration tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, etc., for running performance tests as part of the build process. While Selenium can also be integrated with CI tools, the process may require more configuration and setup.
Learning Curve: BlazeMeter has a relatively steeper learning curve due to its focus on performance testing and using JMeter scripts. Selenium, being more popular and widely adopted, has a larger community and more resources available for learning, making it easier for testers to get started.

BlazeMeter vs Selenium

Overview