StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Bootstrap vs Font Awesome

Bootstrap vs Font Awesome

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Stacks57.4K
Followers13.2K
Votes7.7K
GitHub Stars173.6K
Forks79.2K
Font Awesome
Font Awesome
Stacks58.4K
Followers15.4K
Votes21
GitHub Stars75.8K
Forks12.2K

Bootstrap vs Font Awesome: What are the differences?

Introduction

In website development, two popular tools that are widely used are Bootstrap and Font Awesome. While both are useful in their own ways, there are key differences between the two. In this Markdown code, we will highlight six specific differences between Bootstrap and Font Awesome.

  1. Usage and Purpose: Bootstrap is a comprehensive front-end framework used for developing responsive websites and applications. It provides a wide range of pre-designed components and templates to simplify the development process. On the other hand, Font Awesome is a library consisting of scalable vector icons that can be customized and used within a website or application to enhance its visual appearance.

  2. Component vs Icon Focus: Bootstrap primarily focuses on providing a set of UI components, such as grids, buttons, forms, and navbars, that can be easily integrated into a website. These components are designed to be responsive and mobile-friendly. In contrast, Font Awesome is focused solely on providing a vast collection of icons, including social media icons, navigation icons, and general-purpose icons, which can be customized and used in various contexts within a website or application.

  3. Styling and Customization: When it comes to styling and customization, Bootstrap provides a range of pre-defined themes and styles that can be easily applied to the components. It also provides options for customization through Sass variables and mixins. Font Awesome, on the other hand, allows for easy customization by providing options to change the size, color, and style of the icons through CSS.

  4. Dependencies: Bootstrap is a CSS framework that requires both CSS and JavaScript files to be included in a project. It also has dependencies on jQuery and Popper.js for certain components to function correctly. Font Awesome, however, is primarily a font icon library, and it can be used solely by including the required CSS file without any additional dependencies.

  5. Development Skills Required: To effectively use Bootstrap, a developer should be familiar with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Additionally, knowledge of Bootstrap-specific classes, grid system, and components is necessary. In the case of Font Awesome, the primary requirement is the ability to work with CSS to apply the icons and customize them according to the project's needs.

  6. Community and Support: Bootstrap has a larger and more active community due to its nature as a comprehensive framework. It has extensive documentation, a wide range of tutorials, and a vast user base, which provides good community support. Font Awesome also has a significant community and offers good documentation and support, but since it focuses solely on icons, its community might be relatively smaller compared to Bootstrap.

In summary, Bootstrap is a comprehensive front-end framework with a focus on responsive UI components, while Font Awesome is an icon library with a vast collection of customizable icons. Bootstrap requires CSS and JavaScript files along with additional dependencies, while Font Awesome can be used solely by including the required CSS file. Bootstrap requires knowledge of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, while Font Awesome primarily requires the ability to work with CSS. Both frameworks have active communities and good documentation, but Bootstrap's community might be larger due to its broader scope.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bootstrap, Font Awesome

Bridget
Bridget

Full Stack Developer at Bridget Sarah

May 29, 2020

Decided

I do prefer to write things from scratch however when it came to wanting to jump-start the frontend, I found that it was taking me a lot longer hence why needing to use something very fast.

Bootstrap was the boom when it came out, I didn't like it, to be honest, set in its way and a pain to over-ride and in addition, you can tell from a distance if you're using boostrap and as everything looks the same.

I came across Tailwind CSS as I wanted more dynamic features, you could say, I've been now doing it for a few days and I love it a lot. I've been practising with the full stack part installed but I an't we wait until I do a new project, and I'll e able to select exactly what I want. Much faster.

681k views681k
Comments
Daniel
Daniel

Frontend Developer at atSistemas

Jun 10, 2020

Needs adviceonNew RelicNew RelicNext.jsNext.jsReactReact

I'm building, from scratch, a webapp. It's going to be a dashboard to check on our apps in New Relic and update the Apdex from the webapp. I have just chosen Next.js as our framework because we use React already, and after going through the tutorial, I just loved the latest changes they have implemented.

But we have to decide on a CSS framework for the UI. I'm partial to Bulma because I love that it's all about CSS (and you can use SCSS from the start), that it's rather lightweight and that it doesn't come with JavaScript clutter. One of the things I hate about Bootstrap is that you depend on jQuery to use the JavaScript part. My boss loves UIkIt, but when I've used it in the past, I didn't like it.

What do you think we should use? Maybe you have another suggestion?

1.07M views1.07M
Comments
Syed
Syed

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonBootstrapBootstrapTailwind CSSTailwind CSS

I am planning to redesign my entire application, which is currently in Bootstrap. I heard about Tailwind CSS, and I think its really cool to work with. Is it okay if I use Bootstrap and Tailwind together? I can't remove Bootstrap altogether, as my application is using the js dependencies of Bootstrap, which I don't want to disturb.

739k views739k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Font Awesome
Font Awesome

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

You can get vector icons and social logos on your website with it. It is a font that's made up of symbols, icons, or pictograms that you can use in a webpage, just like a font.

Preprocessors: Bootstrap ships with vanilla CSS, but its source code utilizes the two most popular CSS preprocessors, Less and Sass. Quickly get started with precompiled CSS or build on the source.;One framework, every device: Bootstrap easily and efficiently scales your websites and applications with a single code base, from phones to tablets to desktops with CSS media queries.;Full of features: With Bootstrap, you get extensive and beautiful documentation for common HTML elements, dozens of custom HTML and CSS components, and awesome jQuery plugins.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
173.6K
GitHub Stars
75.8K
GitHub Forks
79.2K
GitHub Forks
12.2K
Stacks
57.4K
Stacks
58.4K
Followers
13.2K
Followers
15.4K
Votes
7.7K
Votes
21
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1582
    Responsiveness
  • 1193
    UI components
  • 943
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 677
    Flexible
Cons
  • 26
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
Pros
  • 8
    CDN
  • 7
    CSS Styling
  • 6
    Open source
  • 0
    Easy Upgrades
  • 0
    API
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
Webpack
Webpack
Vue.js
Vue.js
React
React
AngularJS
AngularJS
Ember.js
Ember.js
CSS 3
CSS 3
Sketch
Sketch

What are some alternatives to Bootstrap, Font Awesome?

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase