StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs Buddybuild

BrowserStack vs Buddybuild

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
Buddybuild
Buddybuild
Stacks46
Followers61
Votes41

BrowserStack vs Buddybuild: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will explore the key differences between BrowserStack and Buddybuild, two popular tools used in software development.

1. Integration with CI/CD tools: BrowserStack offers tight integration with various CI/CD tools like Jenkins and TeamCity, allowing seamless testing automation in the development pipeline. On the other hand, Buddybuild provides its own CI/CD platform with built-in support for iOS and Android projects, streamlining the deployment process for mobile apps.

2. Testing Environments: BrowserStack provides a wide range of real mobile devices and browsers for testing, offering a more comprehensive coverage of platforms for both web and mobile applications. In contrast, Buddybuild primarily focuses on mobile app testing, providing simulators and physical devices for iOS and Android, making it more suitable for mobile-specific projects.

3. Collaboration Features: BrowserStack includes collaborative testing features like interactive sessions, screen sharing, and bug logging, facilitating communication between team members and stakeholders during the testing process. On the other hand, Buddybuild emphasizes team collaboration through features like instant builds, crash reporting, and over-the-air updates for maximum efficiency in the app development workflow.

4. Documentation and Resources: BrowserStack provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and community forums for users to learn and troubleshoot issues effectively, ensuring a smooth user experience with the platform. In comparison, Buddybuild offers a more personalized support system with dedicated customer success managers and a knowledge base to assist users in optimizing their development workflow.

5. Pricing Structures: BrowserStack offers flexible pricing plans based on usage metrics like the number of parallel tests and minutes consumed, making it suitable for teams with varying testing requirements and budgets. Conversely, Buddybuild follows a subscription-based pricing model with tiered plans based on the number of team members and storage, catering to different team sizes and scaling needs.

In Summary, the key differences between BrowserStack and Buddybuild lie in their integration with CI/CD tools, testing environments, collaboration features, documentation resources, and pricing structures, catering to diverse needs in the software development process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, Buddybuild

Rinchin
Rinchin

Jul 20, 2020

Needs adviceonSeleniumSeleniumSauce LabsSauce Labs

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

217k views217k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Buddybuild
Buddybuild

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Buddybuild ties together continuous integration, continuous delivery and an iterative feedback solution into a single, seamless platform.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Frictionless Setup: set up a comprehensive CI system for your iOS and Android apps in just minutes.;Customizable Workflow: use and extend buddybuild to meet the needs of your mobile development workflow.;Test with Confidence: maintain and improve the quality of your code base with automated Unit and UI testing; Effortless Deployment: CD as it should be: one click to send, one click to install.;User Insight: get perfect insight into a tester's experience with buddybuild's mobile SDK.;Connected Services: connect buddybuild with the tools you already use to build your apps.
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
46
Followers
2.0K
Followers
61
Votes
533
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
Pros
  • 12
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Crazy easy
  • 8
    Beta testing
  • 7
    GitHub Integration
  • 3
    Crash reporting
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
Trello
Trello
Slack
Slack
fastlane
fastlane
Jira
Jira
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
TestFlight
TestFlight

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, Buddybuild?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

fastlane

fastlane

fastlane lets you define and run your deployment pipelines for different environments. It helps you unify your app’s release process and automate the whole process. fastlane connects all fastlane tools and third party tools, like CocoaPods.

Bitrise

Bitrise

It is a Continous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) Platform as a Service (PaaS) with a main focus on mobile app development (iOS, Android). You can automate the testing and deployment of your apps with just a few clicks. When you trigger a build a Virtual Machine is assigned to host your build and your defined Workflow (series of Steps scripts) will be executed, step by step.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Greenhouse

Greenhouse

Greenhouse automatically builds your project for every commit you make and runs all your unit or UI tests on the emulator/simulator or on real hardware. Automatic build distribution is also supported so that your team and clients are always up to date with the latest state of your apps.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana